Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content 1998 ed. [Kõva köide]

  • Formaat: Hardback, 218 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 1110 g, IX, 218 p., 1 Hardback
  • Sari: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 71
  • Ilmumisaeg: 31-Oct-1998
  • Kirjastus: Springer
  • ISBN-10: 0792352890
  • ISBN-13: 9780792352891
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 95,02 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 111,79 €
  • Säästad 15%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 2-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Hardback, 218 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 1110 g, IX, 218 p., 1 Hardback
  • Sari: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 71
  • Ilmumisaeg: 31-Oct-1998
  • Kirjastus: Springer
  • ISBN-10: 0792352890
  • ISBN-13: 9780792352891
Teised raamatud teemal:
1. 1 OBJECTIVES The main objective of this joint work is to bring together some ideas that have played central roles in two disparate theoretical traditions in order to con­ tribute to a better understanding of the relationship between focus and the syn­ tactic and semantic structure of sentences. Within the Prague School tradition and the branch of its contemporary development represented by Hajicova and Sgall (HS in the sequel), topic-focus articulation has long been a central object of study, and it has long been a tenet of Prague school linguistics that topic-focus structure has systematic relevance to meaning. Within the formal semantics tradition represented by Partee (BHP in the sequel), focus has much more recently become an area of concerted investigation, but a number of the semantic phenomena to which focus is relevant have been extensively investi­ gated and given explicit compositional semantic-analyses. The emergence of 'tripartite structures' (see Chapter 2) in formal semantics and the partial simi­ larities that can be readily observed between some aspects of tripartite structures and some aspects of Praguian topic-focus articulation have led us to expect that a closer investigation of the similarities and differences in these different theoretical constructs would be a rewarding undertaking with mutual benefits for the further development of our respective theories and potential benefit for the study of semantic effects of focus in other theories as well.

Arvustused

'The book will be of interest to researchers and advanced students in semantics, pragmatics, comparative English-Slavic structure, semantic typology, computational linguistics, and general linguistics theory.' Folia Linguistica, XXXVI (2002)

Acknowledgements ix
Introduction
1(12)
Objectives
1(1)
Background
2(5)
Plan of the work
7(6)
Towards an investigation of the relation between topic-focus articulation and tripartite structures
13(66)
Tripartite structures: background
13(7)
Tripartite structures and topic-focus structure
20(34)
Background
20(4)
Which constructions are focus-sensitive?
24(2)
Connecting topic-focus structure and domain selection to anaphora, presupposition, and context-dependence
26(3)
Topic-focus articulation and its significance in both pragmatic and dynamic semantic interpretation
29(1)
Formalization of three basic examples
30(24)
TFA, the anchoring of sentences in context, and semantics
54(25)
TFA, communicative dynamism, and contextual boundness
54(6)
The semantic relevance of TFA
60(6)
Systemic ordering of kinds of complementations
66(4)
TFA, presupposition, and reference
70(2)
Hierarchical CD and projectivity
72(2)
Constrastive topic and left dislocation
74(1)
Summary
75(4)
Remarks on common background and shared assumptions
79(12)
Linguistic meaning
80(7)
Compositionality
87(4)
Obstacles to joint work
91(12)
Initial view of obstacles from BHP's perspective
91(2)
Initial obstacles from HS's perspective
93(2)
The partial ordering of communicative dynamism vs. recursive branching structure
95(3)
The attachment of only and other focalizers
98(5)
HS's view
99(1)
BHP's view
100(3)
Dialogue, progressing towards a common basis for discussion
103(26)
Notions of topic and comment, background and focus, and scope
103(11)
``Topic-comment'' and ``background-focus'': two distinctions or one?
103(3)
Focus, scope, and background
106(8)
``Focus-sensitivity'', ``focalizers'': views of what they are
114(6)
What is focus-sensitivity?
114(4)
Issues in the order of explanation and the hypothesizing of silent focus and/or abstract focalizers
118(2)
The issue of universality/parochiality of TFA
120(9)
Some hypotheses proposed and examined
129(42)
Initial hypotheses
130(4)
Discussion of some problematic cases
134(15)
Embedded focus and proxy focus
134(2)
The focus of a focalizer
136(2)
Taglicht's examples
138(5)
Other specific cases
143(3)
Focalizer within a noun group
146(1)
Summary
147(2)
Focalizers in the topic
149(12)
Focus of a focalizer within topic
149(6)
Local focus within topic may bear phrasal stress
155(4)
Recursitivity of TFA vs. reoccurring focus of a focalizer within topic
159(2)
Focalizer as the only element of focus
161(1)
Conclusions
161(10)
Hypotheses reconsidered
163(3)
With or without NP-attachment
166(1)
Review of examples
167(4)
Future directions
171(8)
Sentence structure and cognitive content
171(1)
Recursivity of TFA
172(1)
Communicative dynamism as a linear or partial ordering
173(1)
The nature of focus-sensitivity
174(2)
Dependency vs. constituency and categorial grammar
176(1)
Other issues open to further discussion
176(3)
References 179(18)
List of abbreviations 197(2)
Name index 199(4)
Subject index 203