|
|
3 | (12) |
|
Quality Assurance for Expert Systems |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Background to Expert Systems |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
Conventional Software and Expert Systems |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (5) |
|
The Production of Quality Software |
|
|
15 | (16) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Definition of Quality Software |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Attributes of Quality Software |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
Approaches to Achieving Quality Software |
|
|
20 | (7) |
|
Software Engineering Methodologies |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
Software Quality Assurance |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
Independent Verification and Validation |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Formal Proof of Correctness |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Application of Approaches |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
Conventional Software Development |
|
|
31 | (22) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Verification and Validation |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Overview of Classic Life Cycle Process Model |
|
|
34 | (8) |
|
Requirements Analysis and Definition Phase |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
Summary of Validation in Classic Life Cycle |
|
|
44 | (9) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Revalidation During Maintenance Phase |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (4) |
|
The Production of Quality Expert Systems |
|
|
53 | (12) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Definition of Quality Expert Systems |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Characteristics of Quality Expert Systems |
|
|
55 | (5) |
|
Approaches to Achieving Quality Expert Systems |
|
|
60 | (5) |
|
Expert System Development |
|
|
65 | (18) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Verification and Validation |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
Overview of Expert System Process Models |
|
|
69 | (5) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Knowledge Definition Phase |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Summary of Validation in Expert System Development |
|
|
75 | (8) |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Revalidation During Maintenance Phase |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (4) |
|
Issues and Recommendations in Expert System Verification and Validation |
|
|
83 | (24) |
|
Weaknesses of Current Practice |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
Insights from Past Experience |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Difficulties in Verification and Validation |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
Overview of Recommendations in Process Model |
|
|
88 | (6) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Knowledge Definition Phase |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
Verification and Validation Recommendations |
|
|
94 | (6) |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Prevalent Questions About Verification and Validation |
|
|
100 | (7) |
|
Validation Prototype Saves |
|
|
107 | (68) |
|
Introduction and Assumptions |
|
|
107 | (8) |
|
|
115 | (54) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (12) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (14) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Validation Analyzer and Enhancer |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (7) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
a Coverage of Knowledge Base |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
b Coverage of Equivalence Classes |
|
|
153 | (6) |
|
|
159 | (10) |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
|
175 | (8) |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
|
177 | (6) |
Appendix A |
|
183 | (2) |
Appendix B |
|
185 | (8) |
References |
|
193 | (6) |
Index |
|
199 | |