On the eugenic origins of US reproductive lawsand the surprising policy changes needed to remedy it.
The US government spends hundreds of millions of dollars every year to promote and facilitate contraception. Whereas other wealthy countries support broader fertility interventions under the banner of family planning, the United States remains committed only to helping Americansand especially poorer Americansplan not to have a family.
In an unflinching treatise on one of the centurys defining social issues, Leonard M. Lopoo shows how the USs asymmetric reproductive approach is a vestige of the countrys earlier sins: Americas first reproductive policies were authored by some of the twentieth centurys most prominent eugenicists, a group whose primary goal was birth prevention among lower economic classes and racial minorities. These origins have consequently created a contradictory position for the country today, in which contraception for the lowest-income Americans is subsidized, while many upper-class Americans employ technologies to have children with preferable traits.
Lopoo recasts this personal and politicized topic in elegant, stark terms. If the United States is to legislate reproduction, the only defensible approach is equity: helping people who want children to have children. Wanting Children posits a new and elevating criterion for how we think about fertility in the twenty-first century.
Arvustused
"In Wanting Children, Leonard Lopoo spotlights the ways that government family-planning policies are directed exclusively at limiting childbearing, especially among the poor. In this thought-provoking and empirically rich book, he rightly argues that these policies should also be aimed at helping families have children. His argument is especially needed at a time when American fertility has hit record lows. -- Brad Wilcox | University of Virginia From state-driven eugenics to parent-driven embryo selection, Wanting Children confronts a future where choice and technology reshape reproduction. Lopoos call to expand access to assisted reproductive technologies is bold and provocativeraising timely questions about equity and ethics in family planning. -- Caitlin Myers | Middlebury College
1. The Incompleteness of Government-Sponsored Family-Planning Programs
2. A Brief History of Eugenics
3. The Population-Stabilization Period
4. Medicaid as a Test Case
5. The Future Gap
6. On Wantedness
7. Who Gets to Have Children?
Acknowledgments
Notes
References
Leonard M. Lopoo is the Paul Volcker Chair in Behavioral Economics and professor, chair, and associate dean of public administration and international affairs at Syracuse Universitys Maxwell School, where he directs the Maxwell X Lab and serves as senior research associate in the Center for Policy Research. His popular writing has appeared in the Wall Street Journal.
