Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

White Castle: The Evaluation of an Upstanding Prehistoric Enclosure in East Lothian [Pehme köide]

  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 108 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 276x203x6 mm, kaal: 380 g, 42 figures, 8 tables (colour throughout)
  • Ilmumisaeg: 11-Mar-2021
  • Kirjastus: Archaeopress
  • ISBN-10: 1789699304
  • ISBN-13: 9781789699302
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 108 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 276x203x6 mm, kaal: 380 g, 42 figures, 8 tables (colour throughout)
  • Ilmumisaeg: 11-Mar-2021
  • Kirjastus: Archaeopress
  • ISBN-10: 1789699304
  • ISBN-13: 9781789699302
Teised raamatud teemal:
White Castle: The evaluation of an upstanding prehistoric enclosure in East Lothian describes the results of a four year research programme of archaeological works between 2010 and 2013, at the later prehistoric enclosure of White Castle, East Lothian, carried out under the auspices of the Rampart Scotland project. The site is a Scheduled Monument, but, despite being subject of mapping and survey for some 200 years, it has never been examined by excavation prior to the Rampart Scotland project&;s interventions. White Castle was the first of the series of comparable sites to be excavated in the Lammermuir area. The programme of archaeological evaluation and sequence of radiometric dates furnished evidence for four major phases of activity at White Castle &; with the main enclosure period dating to the second half of the first millennium BC. The excavations demonstrated a clear sequence of enclosure development over time, whereby the design and visual impact often appeared to be more important than defence alone. White Castle&;s location on the main route through the Lammermuirs with surrounding upland pasture is also highly suggestive to its function and it seems probable that the site&;s economy was concerned primarily with controlling access to grazing. The final phase of the prehistoric enclosure appears to combine two key factors: impressing visitors and stock control. While maintenance of White Castle&;s enclosure system was abandoned in the closing centuries BC, it is unlikely that the area was deserted and there is also limited evidence for two later phases of activity on site around the Medieval and Early Modern Periods.

This book describes the results of a four-year research programme of archaeological works (2010-3), at the later prehistoric enclosure of White Castle, East Lothian. The excavations demonstrated a clear sequence of enclosure development over time, whereby the design and visual impact often appeared to be more important than defence alone.
1 Abstract
1(1)
2 Introduction
1(3)
3 Study Area
4(4)
4 White Castle Location
8(2)
5 Archaeological Background
10(8)
5.1 White Castle in early maps and accounts
10(2)
5.2 Enclosed sites of East Lothian: Available Data Set
12(6)
5.2.1 Introduction
12(1)
5.2.2 Review of research of prehistoric enclosed sites in East Lothian
12(1)
5.2.3 Refining chronology of East Lothian enclosures
13(2)
5.2.4 Enclosure morphology
15(1)
5.2.5 Enclosure Statistics
15(1)
5.2.6 East Lothian Summary
16(2)
6 Research Questions
18(1)
7 Methodology
18(4)
7.1 Topographic and Management Survey
18(1)
7.3 Geophysical Survey
19(1)
7.3 Numbering system
19(1)
7.4 Excavation
19(2)
7.5 Digital archive
21(1)
8 Topographic and Geophysical Survey Results
22(8)
8.1 Site Topography
22(2)
8.2 Topographic Survey-Routeways and Tracks
24(4)
8.3 Geophysical survey - potential platforms
28(1)
8.4 Assessment of the site management issues
28(2)
8.4.1 Bracken
28(1)
8.4.2 Visitor and animal attrition
29(1)
9 Excavation Results
30(26)
9.1 Pre-enclosure
30(1)
9.2 Enclosing works
30(4)
9.3 Rampart 1
34(1)
9.4 Terrace 1
34(1)
9.5 Palisade 1
34(2)
9.6 Ditch 1
36(1)
9.7 Terrace 4
37(1)
9.8 Rampart 2
38(1)
9.9 Terrace 2
39(1)
9.10 Ditch 2
39(1)
9.11 Rampart 3
40(1)
9.12 Terrace 3
41(1)
9.13 Ditch 3
42(1)
9.14 Inner Circuit Openings 1, 2, 3 and 4
42(1)
9.15 Openings 5,6,7,8,9 and 14
43(1)
9.16 Openings 10,11,12,13
44(1)
9.17 Direct occupational evidence
45(2)
9.18 Platform 4
47(1)
9.19 Platform 8
48(2)
9.20 Indirect occupational evidence
50(2)
9.21 Post-enclosure activity
52(1)
9.22 Platform 20
52(1)
9.23 Structure 17
52(2)
9.24 Track
54(2)
10 Post-excavation
56(6)
10.1 Introduction
56(1)
10.2 Radiocarbon dates
56(3)
10.3 Lithics (Ann Clarke)
59(2)
10.4 Ceramics
61(1)
11 Interpretation and Discussion
62(21)
11.1 Pre-enclosure
62(1)
11.2 Enclosure Chronology
62(3)
11.3 Enclosing works and openings
65(6)
11.4 Destruction and redesign
71(1)
11.5 Internal use and settlement
72(2)
11.6 Economy
74(2)
11.7 Abandonment
76(1)
11.8 Post-enclosure
76(1)
11.9 Whiteadder Route
77(2)
11.10 White Castle within East Lothian: some final considerations of the enclosure design and location
79(4)
12 Conclusion
83(2)
Acknowledgments 85(1)
Bibliography 86(10)
Map references 96(1)
Appendix 1 Calibrated and uncalibrated dates from Enclosed sites in East Lothian 97
David Connolly MCIfA, FSA Scot has had a long career in archaeology since 1981. Being one of the pioneers of buildings archaeology, land survey and a qualified drone pilot, he is always at the forefront of developing new techniques of archaeological recording. Since 1999, David devotes his time to running British Archaeological Jobs Resource (BAJR) and its fieldwork arm, CHC Heritage. ;





Dr Murray Cook, MA Hons, MCIfA FSA Scot is Stirling Councils Archaeologist, an Honorary Research Fellow at Stirling University, and co-director of Rampart Scotland. ;





Hana Kdolska MA, MSc is a graduate of the University of Edinburgh; since 2015 she has participated and run archaeological projects in the UK and the Emirate of Ras al-Khaimah (UAE). In 2020, she joined BAJR and CHC Heritage as a co-director.