|
Issues in the Study of Scrambling |
|
|
3 | (19) |
|
|
3 | (6) |
|
Some Minimalist Background |
|
|
9 | (7) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Movement and Language Variation |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
Scrambling: Syntactic Properties |
|
|
22 | (38) |
|
Scrambling Is Not NP-movement |
|
|
24 | (10) |
|
Case, Agreement, and Scrambling |
|
|
24 | (6) |
|
Scrambling, Binding, and Reconstruction |
|
|
30 | (4) |
|
Scrambling Is Not WH-movement |
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
Scrambling Is Not Topicalization |
|
|
39 | (11) |
|
Hindi-Urdu -to Topicalization |
|
|
41 | (7) |
|
Analyzing Topicalization: MS (1993) |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
Scrambling Is XP-Adjunction |
|
|
53 | (5) |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
The Structure of the UG Clause |
|
|
60 | (22) |
|
Locating the AGR-oP Projection |
|
|
60 | (7) |
|
Ditransitives in the Minimalist Program |
|
|
67 | (13) |
|
|
67 | (6) |
|
Ditransitives in UG: A Proposal |
|
|
73 | (7) |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
Binding and Coreference in UG |
|
|
82 | (32) |
|
Principle A and Reflexive Binding |
|
|
83 | (8) |
|
Raising XP-Reflexives in Minimalism |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Raising X0-Reflexives in Minimalism |
|
|
86 | (5) |
|
Principle B and Pronominal Binding |
|
|
91 | (5) |
|
Raising Pronominals in Minimalism |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
Binding and Coreference in Minimalism |
|
|
96 | (15) |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
|
101 | (10) |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
Scrambling, Focus, and Specificity |
|
|
114 | (24) |
|
Scrambling and Positional Focus |
|
|
114 | (10) |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
120 | (4) |
|
Coreference with Adjoined Positions |
|
|
124 | (6) |
|
Scrambling and Pronominal Coreference |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
Scrambling and Reflexive Binding |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
Scrambling and Specificity |
|
|
130 | (5) |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
|
138 | (15) |
|
XP-Adjunction and Global Economy |
|
|
138 | (4) |
|
The Economy of Representation |
|
|
142 | (4) |
|
The Economy of Derivation |
|
|
146 | (3) |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
Notes |
|
153 | (16) |
Bibliography |
|
169 | (7) |
Index |
|
176 | |