Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Ad Hoc Arbitration in China [Kõva köide]

  • Formaat: Hardback, 160 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 366 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 25-Oct-2018
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0815394500
  • ISBN-13: 9780815394501
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 159,19 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 212,25 €
  • Säästad 25%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 3-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Hardback, 160 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 366 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 25-Oct-2018
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0815394500
  • ISBN-13: 9780815394501

Arbitration is the dominant method in the world for resolving international commercial disputes. As compared with institutional arbitration, ad hoc arbitration has many advantages that make it a preferred way to resolve commercial disputes on many occasions. The Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China, however, requires that parties appoint an arbitration institution in their arbitration agreement, otherwise an ad hoc arbitration agreement is invalid. This rule seems to preclude ad hoc arbitration under Chinese law, and threatens the validity of many arbitration agreements that are imperfectly drafted. Fortunately, however, this does not mean Chinese courts will never enforce an ad hoc arbitration agreement or an ad hoc arbitration award. This book informs parties and practitioners of potential pitfalls related to ad hoc arbitration in China and offers practical guidance. It also conducts a comparative study of the history of arbitration in the western world and in China, to identify the reasons for this hostility to ad hoc arbitration, and calls for changes to this requirement under Chinese law.

Foreword ix
Acknowledgments xi
1 Introduction
1(13)
I Overview and significance
1(3)
II Background
4(6)
A Arbitration vs. litigation
4(3)
B Ad hoc vs. institutional arbitration
7(3)
III The ad hoc problem under Chinese law
10(4)
2 A history of legal transplant
14(25)
I Arbitration's history in the Western world
14(2)
II Arbitration's history in China
16(14)
A The primitive stage: arbitration in Ancient and Imperial China
16(1)
B The start of modernization: arbitration in the late Qing dynasty
17(4)
C Continued modernization: arbitration in the Republic of China
21(1)
D The current system: arbitration in the People's Republic of China
22(8)
III The impact of history on the current Chinese arbitration law
30(2)
IV A legal transplant story
32(7)
3 Enforceability of ad hoc arbitration agreements in China
39(19)
I Rejection of ad hoc arbitration agreements under Chinese law
39(2)
II Different jurisdictions in the Greater China region
41(4)
A Hong Kong and Macau
41(3)
B Taiwan
44(1)
III Enforcing cut hoc arbitration agreements under non-Chinese law
45(7)
A Choice-of-law issues in international commercial arbitration
46(2)
B The SPC's judicial interpretations
48(1)
C The SPC's choice-of-law rule on an arbitration agreement's validity
49(3)
IV Analyzing the SPC's choice-of-law rule
52(5)
A Validity-preferring and pro-arbitration
52(3)
B Potential issues
55(2)
V Conclusion
57(1)
4 Enforceability of ad hoc arbitration awards in China
58(23)
I Foreign ad hoc arbitration awards are enforceable in China
58(5)
II Seemingly dire prospects for Chinese ad hoc arbitration
63(17)
A Successful operation seems impractical under Chinese law
63(6)
B Awards unenforceable under Chinese law
69(11)
III Conclusion
80(1)
5 Making ad hoc arbitration work in China under its current law
81(13)
I A special drafting strategy
81(4)
II Ad hoc arbitration in China will operate successfully
85(2)
A External obstructions no longer possible
85(1)
B Internal obstructions will not happen
86(1)
III The ad hoc arbitration award will be enforceable
87(6)
A More chances of being enforced inside China
88(3)
B More likely to be enforced outside China
91(2)
IV Conclusion
93(1)
6 A system calling for change
94(11)
I A broken system
94(2)
II A vague and problematic standard
96(2)
III Rationale behind the hostility no longer exists
98(6)
A Reasons given by the Chinese lawmakers
99(1)
B A more convincing explanation
100(2)
C Changes in nowadays China
102(2)
IV Conclusion
104(1)
7 Re-thinking China's ad hoc arbitration legal framework
105(16)
I China, should have ad hoc arbitration
105(3)
II China can have ad hoc arbitration
108(6)
A Doubts are unnecessary
108(1)
B Mediation offers a good example
109(5)
III Towards a complete ad hoc arbitration system
114(7)
A The SPC's role
114(5)
B Legislative action is the only choice
119(2)
8 Conclusion
121(6)
Appendices
127(28)
Appendix A Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China
127(17)
Appendix B Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (selected provisions)
144(4)
Appendix C The Supreme People's Court's interpretation on certain issues concerning the application of the `Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China"
148(7)
Index 155
Tietie "Frank" Zhang is a Lecturer in Corporate and Commercial Law at the University of Sheffield School of Law.