| Foreword |
|
ix | |
| Acknowledgments |
|
xi | |
|
|
|
1 | (13) |
|
I Overview and significance |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
|
|
4 | (6) |
|
A Arbitration vs. litigation |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
B Ad hoc vs. institutional arbitration |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
III The ad hoc problem under Chinese law |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
2 A history of legal transplant |
|
|
14 | (25) |
|
I Arbitration's history in the Western world |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
II Arbitration's history in China |
|
|
16 | (14) |
|
A The primitive stage: arbitration in Ancient and Imperial China |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
B The start of modernization: arbitration in the late Qing dynasty |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
C Continued modernization: arbitration in the Republic of China |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
D The current system: arbitration in the People's Republic of China |
|
|
22 | (8) |
|
III The impact of history on the current Chinese arbitration law |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
IV A legal transplant story |
|
|
32 | (7) |
|
3 Enforceability of ad hoc arbitration agreements in China |
|
|
39 | (19) |
|
I Rejection of ad hoc arbitration agreements under Chinese law |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
II Different jurisdictions in the Greater China region |
|
|
41 | (4) |
|
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
III Enforcing cut hoc arbitration agreements under non-Chinese law |
|
|
45 | (7) |
|
A Choice-of-law issues in international commercial arbitration |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
B The SPC's judicial interpretations |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
C The SPC's choice-of-law rule on an arbitration agreement's validity |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
IV Analyzing the SPC's choice-of-law rule |
|
|
52 | (5) |
|
A Validity-preferring and pro-arbitration |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
4 Enforceability of ad hoc arbitration awards in China |
|
|
58 | (23) |
|
I Foreign ad hoc arbitration awards are enforceable in China |
|
|
58 | (5) |
|
II Seemingly dire prospects for Chinese ad hoc arbitration |
|
|
63 | (17) |
|
A Successful operation seems impractical under Chinese law |
|
|
63 | (6) |
|
B Awards unenforceable under Chinese law |
|
|
69 | (11) |
|
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
5 Making ad hoc arbitration work in China under its current law |
|
|
81 | (13) |
|
I A special drafting strategy |
|
|
81 | (4) |
|
II Ad hoc arbitration in China will operate successfully |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
A External obstructions no longer possible |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
B Internal obstructions will not happen |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
III The ad hoc arbitration award will be enforceable |
|
|
87 | (6) |
|
A More chances of being enforced inside China |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
B More likely to be enforced outside China |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
6 A system calling for change |
|
|
94 | (11) |
|
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
II A vague and problematic standard |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
III Rationale behind the hostility no longer exists |
|
|
98 | (6) |
|
A Reasons given by the Chinese lawmakers |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
B A more convincing explanation |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
C Changes in nowadays China |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
7 Re-thinking China's ad hoc arbitration legal framework |
|
|
105 | (16) |
|
I China, should have ad hoc arbitration |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
II China can have ad hoc arbitration |
|
|
108 | (6) |
|
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
B Mediation offers a good example |
|
|
109 | (5) |
|
III Towards a complete ad hoc arbitration system |
|
|
114 | (7) |
|
|
|
114 | (5) |
|
B Legislative action is the only choice |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
|
|
121 | (6) |
|
|
|
127 | (28) |
|
Appendix A Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China |
|
|
127 | (17) |
|
Appendix B Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (selected provisions) |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
Appendix C The Supreme People's Court's interpretation on certain issues concerning the application of the `Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China" |
|
|
148 | (7) |
| Index |
|
155 | |