| Preface: Refraining Conflict |
|
xxiii | |
|
Part I Conflict and the Promise of Conflict Modeling |
|
|
|
1 Environmental Conflicts in a Complex World |
|
|
3 | (28) |
|
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
What Is an Environmental Conflict? |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
Why Are Environmental Conflicts Worth Resolving? |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
The Goals of Environmental Conflict Resolution |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
Sustainability as a Conflict Resolution Target |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Linking Sustainability to Conflict Management |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
The History and Evolution of Conflict Resolution |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Conflict Resolution Efforts across Many Disciplines |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Water Resources Management |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Mutual Gains, Conflict Frames, and Joint Fact-Finding |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Joint Fact-Finding: Expanding the Concept |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
The Convergence of Social Science and Modeling Approaches to Conflict |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Agent-Based Analysis for Dispute Resolution |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Viability Analysis and System Resilience |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
23 | (8) |
|
2 Why Model? How Can Modeling Help Resolve Conflict? |
|
|
31 | (12) |
|
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Formalizing Mental Models through Mathematics and Simulation |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
The Implications of Modeling |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
Models Can Formalize Studies of Conflict |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
The Three-Step Modeling Process |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
|
39 | (4) |
|
3 The History and Types of Conflict Modeling |
|
|
43 | (18) |
|
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Models of War and Arms Races |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
Modeling Conflict vs. Modeling the Causes of Conflict |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
A General Typology of Environmental Modeling |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Game Theory and Conflict Simulation |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Dynamic Models of Conflict |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Simulating Strategy in Conflicts |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
Conflict as an Investment Strategy |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Optimal Strategies and Bounded Rationality |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Simulating Complex, Multiparty Conflicts |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
Network Analysis and Conflict Modeling |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
|
57 | (4) |
|
4 Participatory Modeling and Conflict Resolution |
|
|
61 | (32) |
|
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
Participation and Decision Making |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
The Goals of Participatory Modeling |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
Social Learning and Participatory Modeling |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
Collaborative Learning and Participatory Processes/Modeling |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
The Need for More Evidence |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Lessons Learned for Conducting Participatory Modeling Interventions |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
Modeler and Methodological Transparency |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Approaches to Participatory Modeling |
|
|
72 | (5) |
|
Participatory Modeling and System Dynamics |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Participatory Simulation and Role Playing |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
Decision Analysis and Decision Support |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Complexity and Participatory Modeling |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
|
|
84 | (9) |
|
Part II Modeling Environmental Conflict |
|
|
|
5 System Dynamics and Conflict Modeling |
|
|
93 | (26) |
|
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Participatory SD Modeling |
|
|
98 | (6) |
|
What Makes Participatory SD Modeling Unique? |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
The Participatory SD Modeling Process |
|
|
101 | (3) |
|
System Dynamics and Conflict |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Quantitative vs. Qualitative SD Approaches to Conflict |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Drawbacks to Conflict Modeling with System Dynamics |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
Conflict during and after the Modeling Process |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Are SD Modeling Interventions Effective? |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
|
|
114 | (5) |
|
6 Agent-Based Modeling and Environmental Conflict |
|
|
119 | (36) |
|
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
What Is Agent-Based Modeling? |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
ABM Conflict Applications |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
Complexity Science and ABM Philosophy |
|
|
123 | (4) |
|
A Departure from Previous Views of Structure and Behavior |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
Comparing Individual and Aggregate Modeling |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
Discreteness and Heterogeneity |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Decision Making and Agent Interactions in ABMs |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
Agent Decision Strategies |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
ABM Disruptions to Economic Theory |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Validation and the Empirical Basis of ABMs |
|
|
133 | (3) |
|
Methods for Empirically Informing ABMs |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
|
|
136 | (5) |
|
Conflating "Successful" Participation with Intervention Context |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Role-Playing Games (RPGs) and Agent-Based Modeling (ABMs) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Companion Modeling: A Platform for RPGs |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Participatory ABMs and Social Validation |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
|
|
147 | (8) |
|
7 Modeling Conflict and Cooperation as Agent Action and Interaction |
|
|
155 | (40) |
|
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Adaptation in the Presence of Others |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Unifying Complex Systems Approaches to Studying Conflict |
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
Viability Theory and Resilience |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Viability Theory and Multi-Agent Conflict |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
A Conceptual Introduction to the VIABLE Framework |
|
|
161 | (8) |
|
Four Relationships Determining Conflict and Cooperation |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Single Agent VIABLE Modeling |
|
|
164 | (4) |
|
Multi-Agent VIABLE Modeling |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Mathematical Modeling Using the VIABLE Framework |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
Modeling the Individual Conflict Agent |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
Multi-Agent Interaction, Stability, and Conflict |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
Rigorously Defining Interactions |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
Investment Targets and Equilibria |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
Mathematically Reframing Conditions for Conflict and Cooperation |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
|
|
178 | (4) |
|
A Summary of the VIABLE Process |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Institutions and Conflict |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Appendix 7.1 Adaptation Rates α and β |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Appendix 7.2 Derivation of Single Agent Governing Equations |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
Appendix 7.3 Response Curves Ci and Multi-Agent Interaction Efficiency Matrix fij |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
Appendix 7.4 Stability within Agent Interactions |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
|
185 | (3) |
|
|
|
188 | (7) |
|
Part III Applications of the VIABLE Model Framework |
|
|
|
8 A Viability Approach to Understanding Fishery Conflict and Cooperation |
|
|
195 | (46) |
|
|
|
195 | (2) |
|
The Economic and Ecological Nature of Fishery Conflicts |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
Fishery Decline and Collapse |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Fishery Collapse and Conflict |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Potential Solutions to Fishery Conflicts |
|
|
199 | (3) |
|
Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Noteworthy Criticisms of ITQs |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Taking a Coupled Ecological-Economic Approach |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Defining Fishery Sustainability in Terms of Viability |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
Building an Agent-Based Model of a Fishery Conflict |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
Viability and Uncertainty |
|
|
209 | (3) |
|
Decision Rules Describing the Behavior of Fishers |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
Model 1 Fishers as Global Optimizers |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Model 2 Fishers as Local "Satisficers" |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
Adaptation Delays and Priorities |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
Multiagent and Multifish Stock Interactions |
|
|
215 | (4) |
|
Economic Competition: Satisficers and Optimizers |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
Optimizing and Gradient Decision Rules: The Fishery Decline |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
Economic Cooperation for Sustainable Fishery Management |
|
|
219 | (6) |
|
Creating Cooperative Institutions and Policies |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
Reconsidering Investment and Competitive Advantages |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
Negotiations and Cooperative Fishing Arrangements |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
Simulating a Cooperative Fishing Scenario |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
|
225 | (2) |
|
Appendix 8.1 Ecological and Economic Viability Conditions |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Appendix 8.2 More Details on the Multi-Agent Fishery Model |
|
|
227 | (3) |
|
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
Satisficers (Gradient Decision Rule) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
230 | (2) |
|
|
|
232 | (2) |
|
|
|
234 | (7) |
|
9 An Adaptive Dynamic Model of Emissions Trading |
|
|
241 | (38) |
|
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
Climate Change and Conflict |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
Strategies for Mitigation of Climate Change |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
The Promise of Climate Solutions |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
Putting a Price on Carbon |
|
|
246 | (2) |
|
Modeling Emissions Trading and Policy |
|
|
248 | (2) |
|
Defining Emission Baselines, Targets, and Reduction Goals |
|
|
250 | (3) |
|
Initial Allocation of Permits |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
Allocation Mechanisms to Test |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
Modeling Conflict Potential in Emissions Trading |
|
|
255 | (2) |
|
Elements of Agent Goals or Values |
|
|
255 | (2) |
|
Pricing Carbon through Emissions Trading |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
|
|
259 | (3) |
|
Viability Constraints for Emissions Trading |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
Testing the Viability Constraints |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
Modeling Emissions Trading Scenarios |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
Case 1 Allocations Proportionate to an Agent's Baseline Emissions |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
Case 2 Allocations Proportionate to an Agent's Population (Rule 2) |
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
Appendix 9.1 Derivation of Value Change with Respect to Emissions Reduction νri and Threshold Price πi |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
Appendix 9.2 Derivation of Viability Conditions |
|
|
267 | (2) |
|
Marginal Economic Viability Condition |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
Absolute Economic Viability Condition |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
Environmental Viability Condition |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
269 | (10) |
|
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
|
|
272 | (7) |
|
10 Modeling Bioenergy and Land Use Conflict |
|
|
279 | (42) |
|
|
|
279 | (2) |
|
|
|
281 | (5) |
|
The Potential Impacts of Bioenergy |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
Ecological Impacts and Net Energy Value |
|
|
281 | (2) |
|
Switchgrass and Miscanthus as Bioenergy Crops |
|
|
283 | (2) |
|
Farming and Bioenergy Policy |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
Bioenergy Crops and Conflict |
|
|
286 | (6) |
|
Conflicts over Food and Water |
|
|
288 | (2) |
|
Previous Efforts to Model Agricultural Dynamics |
|
|
290 | (2) |
|
Model Design and Structure |
|
|
292 | (3) |
|
|
|
292 | (3) |
|
Spatial Extension of the Viable Model Framework |
|
|
295 | (2) |
|
Constraining the Model Spatially |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
Initializing the Model to Equilibrium |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
Scenario Analysis for New Biofuel Crops |
|
|
297 | (4) |
|
Scenario 1 Simulating the Introduction of a New Ethanol Refinery |
|
|
297 | (3) |
|
Scenario 2 Simulating Switchgrass and Miscanthus Introduction |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
Scenario 3 Introduction of a Biofuel Subsidy |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
|
|
301 | (3) |
|
Scenario 1 No Demand for Miscanthus or Switchgrass |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
Scenario 2 Introduction of Miscanthus and Switchgrass |
|
|
301 | (3) |
|
Scenario 3 Biofuel Subsidies |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
|
|
304 | (3) |
|
Appendix 10.1 Agent Model of Biofuel Investment and Harvesting |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
307 | (3) |
|
|
|
310 | (4) |
|
|
|
314 | (7) |
|
11 The Future of Modeling Environmental Conflict and Cooperation |
|
|
321 | (8) |
|
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
|
|
322 | (2) |
|
Conflict Resolution Is Becoming an Increasingly Supported and Sophisticated Field |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
Participatory Processes and Modeling Are Gaining a Foothold |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
Cross-Pollination between Modeling Methods Makes Them More Useful |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
The VIABLE Model Can Help Us Find Alternative Pathways to Increasing Agent Value |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
There Are Opportunities to Better Understand the Emergent Effects of Conflicts |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
|
|
324 | (2) |
|
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
Are We Modeling What We Mean to Model? |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
How Do We Make Conflict Modeling a Common and Standard Activity? |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
How Can Modeling Prevent Conflict? |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
Questions for Consideration |
|
|
326 | (1) |
|
|
|
326 | (3) |
| Index |
|
329 | |