Editors and contributors |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xiii | |
|
List of tables and figures |
|
|
xv | |
Preface |
|
xvii | |
Introduction: Aspect and event structure as topics in linguistic and psychological research (Cienki, Iriskhanova) |
|
1 | (6) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
2 Semantics approached from the perspective of conceptualization and mental simulation |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
3 Beyond language -- visible action expressing conceptualization |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
4 The main research questions |
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
Chapter 1 Aspect through the lens of event construal |
|
|
7 | (54) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.1 Events: An historical and philosophical overview |
|
|
7 | (20) |
|
1.1.1 Events as phenomena on the levels of cognition, language, and communication (Iriskhanova) |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
1.1.2 Various approaches to the study of events in philosophy (Iriskhanova) |
|
|
10 | (5) |
|
1.1.3 Various approaches to the study of events in linguistics (Iriskhanova) |
|
|
15 | (5) |
|
1.1.4 Studying the internal structure of event construal: Points in common from philosophy and linguistics (Iriskhanova) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
1.1.5 Recent cognitive linguistic approaches (Cienki) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
1.1.5.1 Background on construal in cognitive linguistics |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
1.1.5.2 Imaging systems in language |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
1.1.5.3 Construal in cognitive grammar |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
1.2 Aspect across traditions: Main lines of research (Iriskhanova, Morgenstern, Muller, Richter) |
|
|
27 | (22) |
|
1.2.1 Aspect -- Aktionsart -- Vid -- Aspectuality |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
1.2.2 Early studies of aspect in French, German, and Russian linguistics |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
1.2.3 Present-day studies of aspect: Some specific issues |
|
|
34 | (6) |
|
1.2.4 Present-day studies of aspect: Points of convergence |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
1.2.4.1 The influence of Anglo-American theories of aspect: Blurring grammatical and lexical aspect |
|
|
40 | (4) |
|
1.2.4.2 Using conceptual boundaries |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
2 Background on talk-based multimodal communication |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.1 Thinking for speaking and gesturing (Cienki) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
2.1.1 Linguistic relativity hypothesis |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 Thinking for speaking |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (7) |
|
2.2.1 Visual and proprioceptive modalities |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
2.2.1.1 Gestures derive from imagistic thinking (Boutet) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
2.2.1.2 Visual perception of gestures (Boutet) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
2.2.1.3 The importance of proprioception (Boutet) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
2.2.1.4 `Gain control' (Becker) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Gestures as motion events (Muller) |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
2.2.3 Introducing the notion of boundary schemas (Muller) |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
2.3 Summing up: Aspect as amodal or as modality-dependent (Boutet, Morgenstern, Cienki) |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
Chapter 2 Researching aspect in multimodal communication: Consequences for data and methods |
|
|
61 | (16) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
2 The choice of data and method of elicitation for the production studies (Cienki, Becker) |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
3 Categories used for the analysis of event construal in spoken language (Cienki) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
4 Categories used for the analysis of event construal in gesture |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
4.1 Features for the gesture phases: Determining the unit of analysis (Boutet, Muller) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
4.2 Pulse of effort as a kinesiological criterion (Boutet) |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
4.3 Bounded and unbounded schemas (Boutet, Muller) |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
5 Bringing it all together: Annotation and coding (Boutet, Morgenstern) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
5.1 Choice of controlled vocabulary |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
5.2 Choice of the type of template and hierarchy |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
Chapter 3 Speakers' verbal expression of event construal: Quantitative and qualitative analyses |
|
|
77 | (30) |
|
1 Introduction: Construal of events in spoken narrative (Iriskhanova) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
1.1 Basic features of narrative discourse |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
1.2 Basic features of spoken narratives |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
1.3 Some preliminary remarks on the textual data |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
2 The French speakers' verbal expression of event construal (Morgenstern, Boutet, Debras) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
2.1 Background on the uses of tenses in narratives |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
2.2 Quantitative analyses |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (7) |
|
2.3.1 Difference between the passe compose and the imparfait |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
2.3.2 Use of the present tense in narratives |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
2.3.3 Alternation between imparfait, present simple, and passe compose |
|
|
87 | (3) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
3 The German speakers' verbal expression of event construal (Muller) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
3.1 Introduction: Specifics of aspectual event construal in tense forms in spoken German |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
3.2 Quantitative analyses: Use of Prateritum and Perfekt in spoken German as compared to French use of imparfait and passe compose |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
3.3 Qualitative analyses: The use of Prateritum and Perfekt in spoken German |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
4 The Russian speakers' verbal expression of event construal (Denisova, Iriskhanova) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
4.1 Introducing general specifics of tense and aspect use in spoken Russian narratives |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
4.2 Quantitative analysis: General results for Russian verbs |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
4.3 Qualitative analyses of Russian verbs |
|
|
98 | (6) |
|
4.3.1 Some preliminary remarks on the specifics of Russian spoken narratives |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Tense and aspect as related to the specifics of spoken narratives |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
4.3.3 Semantic features of verbs as related to the specifics of spoken narratives |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
4.3.4 Structural features of verbs as related to the specifics of spoken narratives |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
Chapter 4 Speakers' gestural expression of event construal: Quantitative and qualitative analyses |
|
|
107 | (36) |
|
1 Introduction (Boutet, Morgenstern, Cienki) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
1.1 Choice of the coding protocol for gesture analysis |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
1.2 Inter-coder reliability |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
1.3 Category-specific particularities |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
2 The French speakers' gestural expression of event construal (Boutet, Morgenstern) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
2.1 Introduction: Hypothesis for French |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
2.2 Boundary schemas in French gestures |
|
|
114 | (8) |
|
2.2.1 Quantitative results |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
2.2.2 Qualitative analyses |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
2.2.3 Counterexamples: The role of lexical aspect and the multi-functionality of gestures |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
3.1 Introduction: Hypothesis for German |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
3.2 Results of boundary schema analysis for German |
|
|
123 | (7) |
|
3.2.1 Quantitative results |
|
|
123 | (4) |
|
3.2.2 Qualitative analyses |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
3.2.2.1 Use of bounded gestures with Perfekt and unbounded gestures with Prateritum |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
3.2.2.2 Some reasons for the distribution of bounded and unbounded gestures with the Prateritum |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
3.3 Discussion: German as a complex case |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
4 Russian (Denisova, Iriskhanova, Cienki) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
4.1 Introduction: Hypothesis for Russian |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
4.2 Results of boundary schema analysis for Russian |
|
|
132 | (9) |
|
4.2.1 Quantitative results |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
4.2.2 Additional factors analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.1 Preliminary analysis |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.2 In-depth analysis |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
4.2.2.3 Results and discussion |
|
|
137 | (4) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
5 Summary (Cienki, Muller) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Chapter 5 Looking ahead: Kinesiological analysis (Boutet, Morgenstern, Cienki) |
|
|
143 | (18) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
2 A kinesiological view of gesture |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
2.1 Intrinsically multiple frames of reference |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
2.2 A geometry associated with space |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
3 Movement (motor) control from a kinesiological perspective |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
3.1 Velocity in relation to shape |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
3.2 The opposition of phase law |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
3.3 The principle of isochrony |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
3.5 Types of motion transfer |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
4 Case study: Kinesiological analysis of the French gesture data |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
4.1 Propagation flow and perfectivity |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
4.2 Number and type of segments and perfectivity |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
157 | (4) |
|
Chapter 6 Comprehension of event construal from multimodal communication (Becker, Gonzalez-Marquez) |
|
|
161 | (18) |
|
1 Approaches in psychology |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
1.1 Psychology as a way of knowing |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
1.2 Theories in cognitive psychology |
|
|
162 | (4) |
|
1.2.1 Situation models in discourse processing |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
1.2.1.1 Event Indexing Model |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 Event segmentation theory |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
2 Background to the comprehension experiment |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
2.1 Introduction to the comprehension experiment |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
3.2.1 Language background |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
5 Discussion of combined analyses |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
7 Afterword: The need for interdisciplinary collaboration |
|
|
177 | (2) |
CONCLUSION: Aspectuality and the expression of event construal as variably multimodal {Iriskhanova, Cienki) |
|
179 | (6) |
References |
|
185 | (20) |
Appendix A The two-part consent form used in the production study, which was translated into French, German, and Russian |
|
205 | (2) |
Appendix B The conversation prompts as provided in each language |
|
207 | (2) |
Appendix C Illustration of the categories used for controlled vocabulary in ELAN for verb coding, taking the Russian verbal data as an example |
|
209 | (2) |
Appendix D Transliteration conventions used for Russian (Cyrillic to Latin alphabet) |
|
211 | (2) |
Name index |
|
213 | (4) |
Subject index |
|
217 | |