Preface |
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xv | |
|
|
1 | (130) |
|
|
3 | (24) |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
Relations between areas of research |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
Converging evidence and the role of methods: Main claims this book |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
|
27 | (20) |
|
|
28 | (6) |
|
From conceptual structure to cognitive process and product |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
From conceptual structure to linguistic form |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
Deductive and inductive approaches |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
The deductive approach and scientific progress |
|
|
37 | (5) |
|
From conceptual metaphor to embodied, cultural experience |
|
|
37 | (3) |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
Alternative deductive approaches |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
Conceptualization: Theoretical definitions |
|
|
47 | (26) |
|
|
48 | (9) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
The class-inclusion approach |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
The career of metaphor approach |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Parameters of metaphor models |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
|
57 | (4) |
|
|
61 | (3) |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
Metaphor and literal meaning |
|
|
66 | (4) |
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
Operationalization: Operational definitions |
|
|
73 | (30) |
|
Criteria for metaphor identification |
|
|
74 | (8) |
|
Criteria for metaphor in usage |
|
|
75 | (5) |
|
Criteria for metaphor in grammar |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
|
82 | (6) |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
|
88 | (6) |
|
Decisions and measurement scales |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
Metaphorical for who? The role of variation and change |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
From moments of decision to tools |
|
|
97 | (4) |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
Application: Data collection and analysis |
|
|
103 | (28) |
|
Data: Verbal, nonverbal, and meta |
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
Data collection: Introspection, observation, manipulation |
|
|
107 | (9) |
|
Thought data: The conceptual structures of metaphor |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
Language data: The linguistic forms of metaphor |
|
|
111 | (5) |
|
Data analysis: Quantitative and qualitative |
|
|
116 | (4) |
|
Analyst performance: Reliability and error |
|
|
120 | (7) |
|
Interanalyst agreement and individual bias |
|
|
121 | (3) |
|
Interanalyst agreement and chance |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Doing methodological research |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
|
127 | (4) |
|
PART 2. Finding metaphor in grammar |
|
|
131 | (134) |
|
Linguistic forms in grammar |
|
|
133 | (38) |
|
Cognitive-linguistic examples of the deductive approach |
|
|
134 | (4) |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
|
138 | (6) |
|
Conventionalized versus ad-hoc polysemy |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
Polysemy, homonymy, and monosemy |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
|
144 | (5) |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
Sense relations by nonliteral similarity |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
|
149 | (10) |
|
|
149 | (5) |
|
Metaphoric or metonymic polysemy? |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
Finding metaphorical polysemy: Conceptual metaphor as a search mechanism |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
|
159 | (4) |
|
|
163 | (4) |
|
|
167 | (4) |
|
Conceptual structures in grammar (1): Domains |
|
|
171 | (30) |
|
Cognitive-linguistic examples of the deductive approach |
|
|
172 | (5) |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
|
177 | (7) |
|
Domains and other conceptual systems |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
Defining conceptual domains |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
Domains and metaphorically motivated polysemy |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (4) |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
|
191 | (5) |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
Conceptual structures in grammar (2): Mappings |
|
|
201 | (28) |
|
Cognitive-linguistic examples of the deductive approach |
|
|
202 | (6) |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
|
205 | (3) |
|
|
208 | (5) |
|
Defining cross-domain mappings |
|
|
208 | (2) |
|
Configurations of domains and mappings: Metaphor and/or metonymy |
|
|
210 | (3) |
|
|
213 | (4) |
|
|
217 | (3) |
|
|
220 | (4) |
|
|
224 | (3) |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
Cognitive processes and products in grammar |
|
|
229 | (36) |
|
Cognitive-linguistic examples of the deductive approach |
|
|
230 | (4) |
|
|
234 | (8) |
|
|
234 | (3) |
|
|
237 | (5) |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
244 | (4) |
|
|
248 | (5) |
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
|
251 | (2) |
|
|
253 | (7) |
|
|
253 | (4) |
|
|
257 | (3) |
|
|
260 | (5) |
|
PART 3. Finding metaphor in usage |
|
|
265 | (140) |
|
Linguistic forms and conceptual structures in usage (I): Metaphorical language use |
|
|
267 | (42) |
|
Cognitive-linguistic examples of the deductive approach |
|
|
268 | (6) |
|
|
269 | (4) |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
|
274 | (9) |
|
|
274 | (2) |
|
Defining metaphorical linguistic forms in usage: Indirectness and incongruity |
|
|
276 | (5) |
|
Defining cross-domain mappings in usage: Two domains or many spaces? |
|
|
281 | (2) |
|
|
283 | (6) |
|
Linguistic forms: The Pragglejaz method |
|
|
283 | (4) |
|
Conceptual structures: Barcelona's method |
|
|
287 | (2) |
|
|
289 | (4) |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
|
293 | (8) |
|
|
293 | (2) |
|
|
295 | (6) |
|
|
301 | (5) |
|
|
306 | (3) |
|
Linguistic forms and conceptual structures in usage (2): Other forms of metaphor |
|
|
309 | (36) |
|
Cognitive-linguistic examples of the deductive approach |
|
|
311 | (6) |
|
|
311 | (5) |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
|
317 | (7) |
|
|
317 | (2) |
|
Four dimensions of metaphor in usage |
|
|
319 | (4) |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
|
324 | (3) |
|
|
327 | (2) |
|
|
329 | (10) |
|
|
339 | (3) |
|
|
342 | (3) |
|
Cognitive processes and products in usage |
|
|
345 | (36) |
|
Cognitive-linguistic examples of the deductive approach |
|
|
345 | (4) |
|
|
349 | (5) |
|
|
354 | (4) |
|
|
358 | (4) |
|
|
362 | (6) |
|
|
368 | (9) |
|
|
368 | (2) |
|
Data collection and analysis |
|
|
370 | (7) |
|
|
377 | (2) |
|
|
379 | (2) |
|
Evidence for metaphor in grammar and usage |
|
|
381 | (24) |
|
The production of evidence: The empirical cycle |
|
|
382 | (8) |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
|
384 | (2) |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
|
387 | (2) |
|
|
389 | (1) |
|
The interpretation of evidence: The field of research |
|
|
390 | (9) |
|
|
391 | (4) |
|
|
395 | (4) |
|
The utilization of evidence: Variations on convergence |
|
|
399 | (3) |
|
|
402 | (3) |
References |
|
405 | (22) |
Index |
|
427 | |