Preface |
|
xv | |
Unit I. We Co-construct Our Groups by Communicating |
|
|
1. Why Study Group Communication Pitfalls? |
|
|
1 | (21) |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Why Do Groups Matter Enough to Make a Study of Them? |
|
|
3 | (6) |
|
Groups Are Important to Happiness and Success |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Group Dynamics Change Communication |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
We Use Group Communication to Co-construct Our World |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Effective Groups Do More or Better Work |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
Definitions of Group and Communication and Pitfalls |
|
|
9 | (8) |
|
What Constitutes Communication? |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
What Constitutes a Group? |
|
|
11 | (4) |
|
What Constitutes Group Communication Pitfalls? |
|
|
15 | (12) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
Casting a Wide Net to Include All Pitfalls and Breakdown |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Group Communication Pitfalls by Commission or by Omission |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
The Breakdown-Conducive Group Framework |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Why Should We Focus Our Study of Groups on Group Communication Pitfalls? |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Chapter Summary and Conclusion |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
2. How Grouping and Group Direction Help Create Effective Group Experiences |
|
|
22 | (23) |
|
The Universals of Grouping Activity |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
The Framework for Grouping and Group Direction |
|
|
27 | (10) |
|
Grouping and Group Direction |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Direction Giving and Direction Givers |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
The Direction-Conducive Group |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Aggregate and Aggregate Puddle |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Rhetorical Situation and a Purgatory Puddle |
|
|
37 | (6) |
|
Chapter Summary and Conclusion |
|
|
43 | (2) |
Unit II. We Struggle to Co-construct and Frame Our Circumstances and Processes |
|
|
3. Pitfalls in Task and Supragroup Exigencies |
|
|
45 | (21) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Purgatory Puddle Pitfalls |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (8) |
|
Inappropriate or Inadequate Resources |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Crisis in the Supraenvironment |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Competition With Other Groups |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
Members' Obligations to Other Groups |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Values or Goals Mismatch Between Group and Suprasystem |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Poor Recruiting and Consciousness-Raising Processes |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
History with Group or Grouping Member(s) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (6) |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
Task Is Means Independent |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Clear Solution Is Available |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Task Is Incoherent: Cannot Be Understood |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Task Lacks Need for Group Acceptance |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
How to Expect, Detect, and Correct These Pitfalls |
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (25) |
|
"Wrong Group for the Task" Pitfalls |
|
|
66 | (5) |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
Members Lack Personal Resources |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Lack of Group Communication Skills |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Lack of Authority or Credibility |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Lack of Personal Capacity |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
A Negative Assembly Effect |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (5) |
|
Demographics and Personality |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
Orientation Toward Achievement |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Orientation Toward Procedural Order and Time |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Orientation Toward Information |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Orientation Toward Interaction |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
Style From Theories of Interaction |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Style of Personal Impression |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Style from Theories of Communication Utilities |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
How to Expect, Detect, and Correct These Pitfalls |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
5. Pitfalls in Grouping Techniques, Tendencies, and Process Prizes |
|
|
91 | (25) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (8) |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
Lack of Appropriate Procedures Pitfalls |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
Grouping Tendencies: Norms and Roles |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Faulty or Inadequate Norms |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Enforcement of Inappropriate Group Norms |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Communication Network Pitfalls |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Role Collision and Conflict |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Role Representation in Boundary Spanning |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Co-constructing Some Bad Role Outcomes |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Deliberation Outcome Pitfalls |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
Additional Ways to Expect, Detect, and Correct These Pitfalls |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (3) |
|
6. Pitfalls in Confusion, Conformity, Conflict, and Group Consciousness: Grouping Concomitants |
|
|
116 | (23) |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
120 | (5) |
|
|
121 | (3) |
|
Minor Maladaptive Conformity |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Moderate Maladaptive Conformity |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Strong Maladaptive Conformity |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Sanctions and Idiosyncrasy Credits |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (5) |
|
Too Little Conflict for the Group |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Too Much Conflict for the Group |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Inappropriate Responses to Conflict |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (7) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Too Little Sense of Group Consciousness |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Maladaptive Grouping Consciousness |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
How to Expect, Detect, and Correct These Pitfalls |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
7. Pitfalls in Vision and Direction Giving |
|
|
139 | (23) |
|
|
140 | (10) |
|
Disadvantages to the Vision/Outcome |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (4) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Failure to Want a Direction Giver |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Failure to Want a Necessary Type of Direction Giver |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Overreliance on Direction Giver |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Over-attribution of Credit or Blame |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (5) |
|
Appointed Rather Than Emerged |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Flawed Direction Giver Selection Outcomes |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
Pitfalls from Poor Direction-Giving Choices |
|
|
152 | (12) |
|
Wrong Direction Giver Types |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Wrong Direction-Giving Style |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Direction Giver's Orientation Toward Power |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
Failure to Serve or Appropriately Balance Group Functions |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Failure to Cultivate New Direction Givers |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Failure to Enculturate New Direction Givers and Grouping Members |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
How to Expect, Detect, and Correct These Pitfalls |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
Unit III: We Co-construct Our Exigencies for Grouping Into Our Group Outcomes |
|
|
8. (Un)Intended Group Outcomes |
|
|
162 | (22) |
|
Dynamics Involved in Potential Group Outcomes |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
Satisficing and Optimizing |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Intensity and Duration of Fundamental Change |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
A Set of Potential Group Outcomes |
|
|
166 | (16) |
|
Type I Group Outcomes: The Satisficed Group |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
The Good Satisficed Group |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
Type II Group Outcomes: The Optimized Group Versus the Failed Group |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
Type III Group Outcomes: Synergized Groups |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
The Good Synergized Group |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
Type IV Group Outcomes: Good and Bad Baggage Groups |
|
|
175 | (12) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Using the Set of Potential Group Outcomes to Expect, Detect, and Correct Group Pitfalls |
|
|
176 | (5) |
|
Understanding the Set of Potential Group Outcomes |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
9. To Group or Not to Group, That Is the Question |
|
|
184 | (21) |
|
General Exigencies Against Grouping |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
187 | (4) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Groups Let Bad Roles Reign |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Groups Confuse Authority and Responsibility |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
Distrust of Self as a Grouping Member |
|
|
191 | (4) |
|
Disrespect of One's Own Grouping Competence |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
Dislike for Losing Autonomy |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
Distaste for Use of Personal Resources |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
Distrust of Any Aspect of This Particular Grouping Effort |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
Something Is Wrong with This Purgatory Puddle |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Some Other Group Commands My Attention |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Someone Else Is Responsible for This Job |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
Inertia and Specific Exigencies Against Grouping |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
How Exigencies Against Grouping May Manifest |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Expecting, Detecting, and Correcting These Pitfalls: General Orientational Advice |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
10. Observing Groups Well |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
Improving Observational Focus and Quality |
|
|
207 | (3) |
|
Observing the Purgatory Puddle |
|
|
210 | (4) |
|
Defining and Discussing Key Terms |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Analyzing the Group's Task, Problem, or Charge |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Identifying and Discussing Stakeholders |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Identifying and Discussing Exigencies For and Against Grouping |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Identifying Limitations on the Group and Grouping Resources |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
Discussing and Setting Group Goals |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
Observing The Way/Process |
|
|
214 | (10) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
Network Analysis and Sociometric Indices |
|
|
219 | (3) |
|
Group Consciousness: Climate, Cohesion, and Culture |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
Observing the Vision/Outcome and the Savior Complex |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
Notes |
|
227 | (2) |
References |
|
229 | (8) |
Index |
|
237 | (10) |
About the Authors |
|
247 | |