Based on studies conducted in Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and Spain and addressing a range of scientific topics, this book presents data and analyses relating to the ways in which EU citizens acquire science-related knowledge, and offers recommendations for the effective communication of science.
Science communication aims at the successful sharing and explanation of sciencerelated topics to a wider audience. In order to enhance communication between science and society, a better understanding of citizens’ habits and perceptions is needed. Therefore, it is vital to understand how citizens acquire knowledge about science- related issues, how this knowledge affects their beliefs, opinions and perceptions, and what sources of information they choose to learn about science – and how they assess their reliability. This book addresses these questions, based on the analyses of public consultations data from Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and Spain, concerned with the science communication of issues including climate change, vaccines, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Sharing experiences of how to engage citizens in public consultation, it provides insights into the mobilisation of interest in science and offers recommendations on how to improve science communication.
Introduction
1. Behind the Scenes: The CONCISE Public Consultation
Methodology
2. The Trustworthiness and Reliability of Science Information
Channels and Sources in the Publics View
3. Perceptions of Science
Information on Climate Change and GMOs
4. What Do Citizens Want? Science
Communication in the Eyes of the Public
5. Citizens Acceptance of Public
Consultation Rules: Results of the CONCISE Project Evaluations
Carolina Moreno-Castro is an expert on science communication research. She leads ScienceFlows, a research team focused on analyses of how perceptions and opinions about science are constructed among citizens (general audience, scientists, stakeholders and other social agents) and the role played by media, social networks and other platforms in disseminating science information.
Aneta Krzewiska is an author of methodological publications. She implemented 30+ qualitative and quantitative research studies. Her scientific interests include deliberative techniques and social research methodology. She is actively searching for new tools to collect citizens opinions and carries out methodological tests on the techniques of group decision- making and consensus reaching.
Magorzata Dzimiska is a researcher on higher education. She conducts studies on quality, knowledge and innovation management at universities. She actively promotes science communication and community- based participatory research. She is a member of the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) and the European Higher Education Society (EAIR).
