|
|
1 | (10) |
|
1.1 The Prism of Patent Big Data |
|
|
1 | (4) |
|
1.1.1 The Vs to the Patent Big Data Paradigm |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.1.2 Coping with Patent Big Data Complexity |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
1.1.3 Harnessing Patent Big Data Analytics to Make a Difference |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
1.2.1 Part I: Patent as Data |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 Part II: Network Analytics |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.2.3 Part III: Uncover Corporate Innovation with Patent Analytics |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.2.4 Part IV: Future Developments with AI |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (3) |
Part I Patent as Data |
|
|
2 A Brief History of Patents |
|
|
11 | (10) |
|
2.1 The Prelude of the Patent System |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
2.2 The First Patent with Claims |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
2.3 The Great Fire and Patent Numbering |
|
|
12 | (4) |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
3 Understanding Patent Data |
|
|
21 | (20) |
|
3.1 Patents, Designs, and Trademarks |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
3.2 A Walk Through of Patent Data Fields |
|
|
24 | (8) |
|
3.2.1 INID Codes and Bibliographic Data |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
3.2.2 Patent Numbering System and Kind-Of-Documents |
|
|
27 | (3) |
|
3.2.3 Patent Classification System |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
3.2.4 International Patent Classification (INID Code: 51) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
3.2.5 Cooperative Patent Classification (INID Code: 52) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
3.3 Same Same, but Different Design Patents |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
3.4 Comprehending Trademark Data |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
4 Claims, "Legally, Less is More!" |
|
|
41 | (16) |
|
4.1 Disentangling Patent Claims |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
4.2 Broad or Narrow: All-Elements Rule |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
4.3 Anatomy of Patent Claims |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
4.4 The Butterfly Effect of Design Patents |
|
|
49 | (4) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (3) |
Part II Network Analytics |
|
|
|
57 | (16) |
|
5.1 Why Does Patent Network Analysis Matter? |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
5.2 Basic Concept of Network and Graph Theory |
|
|
58 | (4) |
|
5.2.1 Node, Edges, and Attributes |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Undirected and Directed Network |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 One-Mode and Two-Mode Networks |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
5.2.4 Ego Networks and Complete Networks |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (7) |
|
|
62 | (5) |
|
5.3.2 Network Diameter and Density |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
5.3.3 Clustering and Modularity |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
6 Patent Citations Analysis |
|
|
73 | (10) |
|
6.1 The Meaning of Patent Citations |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
6.2 How to Scale up Patent Citation Networks |
|
|
76 | (3) |
|
6.3 Pitfalls and Best Practices in Using Patent Citation Data |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
7 Patent Data Through a Visual Lens |
|
|
83 | (14) |
|
7.1 Unexpected Encounters |
|
|
83 | (4) |
|
|
87 | (5) |
|
7.2.1 Bar, Line, and Pie Charts |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
7.2.2 Geospatial Visualizations |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
7.3 Network Visualizations |
|
|
92 | (4) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
8 How to Study Patent Network Analysis |
|
|
97 | (20) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
8.2 Choosing Network Analysis Tools |
|
|
99 | (5) |
|
8.3 Four Practical Steps for Patent Network Analysis |
|
|
104 | (10) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (3) |
Part III Uncover Corporate Innovation with Patent Analytics |
|
|
9 Is Innovation Design-or Technology-Driven? Dyson |
|
|
117 | (10) |
|
9.1 Dyson: From Bagless Vacuum Cleaner to Bladeless Hairdryer |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
9.2 Dyson's Patent Citation Analysis: A Complete Network |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
9.3 Technology or Design First? Ego Networks of the Bladeless Fan |
|
|
121 | (3) |
|
9.4 Forecasting Dyson's Next Innovation |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
10 Predict Strategic Pivot Points: Bose |
|
|
127 | (12) |
|
10.1 Bose's New Neat! Innovation Pivots |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
10.2 Core Innovation: Better Sound |
|
|
129 | (4) |
|
10.3 Four Innovation Pivots: Beyond Sound |
|
|
133 | (5) |
|
10.3.1 Technology Pivot: Suspension Seats for Vehicles |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
10.3.2 Customer Segment Pivot: High-Tech Cooktops |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
10.3.3 Platform Pivot: Audio AR Sunglasses |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
10.3.4 Zoom-In Pivot: Noise-Masking Sleepbuds |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
11 Who Drives Innovation? Apple |
|
|
139 | (10) |
|
11.1 The Shapes of Internal Collaborations: Apple and Google |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
11.2 Apple's Inventor Network: One-Mode Network |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
11.3 Apple's Inventor-Technology Network: Two-Mode Network |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
12 Knowledge Acquisition and Assimilation After M&As: Adobe |
|
|
149 | (12) |
|
12.1 Adobe M&A Activities |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
12.2 Inventor Network Analysis as a Proxy of Innovation Assimilation |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
12.3 Evolution of Adobe's Inventor Network |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
12.4 Knowledge Diffusion in Design and Technology |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
13 Learn to Build Design Innovation Team: Samsung Versus LG |
|
|
161 | (14) |
|
13.1 A Look at Samsung and LG's Patenting Activities |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
13.2 Diversification of Product Innovation |
|
|
162 | (4) |
|
13.3 Different Structure of Design Team |
|
|
166 | (5) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (3) |
Part IV Future Developments with AI |
|
|
14 Is Trademark the First Sparring Partner of AI? |
|
|
175 | (12) |
|
14.1 The Great Wall: A Trademark Powerhouse |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
14.2 How AI Changes Trademarks Searches |
|
|
176 | (6) |
|
14.3 Use Case: AI-Based Trademark Search for Brand Protection |
|
|
182 | (3) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
15 Legal Technologies in Action |
|
|
187 | (18) |
|
15.1 Background: AI and IP |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
15.2 Five AI Applications in IP |
|
|
188 | (9) |
|
15.2.1 Automatic Classification |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
15.2.2 Machine Translation |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
15.2.3 Examination and Formality Checks |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
15.2.4 Image Search and Recognition |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
194 | (3) |
|
15.3 The Rise of Legal Technology |
|
|
197 | (5) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (2) |
Afterword |
|
205 | |