"Religious Education: Educating for Diversity raises issues that are central to the theory and practice of education, and in particular religious education, in modern liberal democracies characterized by diversity in its different forms. What kind of religious education is best equipped both to challenge prejudice and intolerance in society and to develop responsible and respectful relationships between people from different communities or with different commitments? Two eminent educators address this question and propose contrasting answers. Attention is given to the aims of education and the contribution of religious education to the curriculum; historical forms of religious education; the nature of diversity in society; the roots of prejudice; different methodologies in religious education and their philosophical and religious commitments; and to positive strategies to enable religious education to realise its potential and contribute to the social and moral aims of liberal education"--
In light of the philosophical and theological tensions that exist between religious exclusivism and religious pluralism, Barnes and Davis debate about the kind of religious education that is suitable for modern liberal democratic states characterized by diversity. In Religious Education: Teaching for Diversity, Barnes discusses such matters as the nature and challenge of diversity, why the liberal theological model fails to promote respect for others, and towards the future. Davis replies with A Pluralist Approach to Religious Education, in which he addresses topics such as divine transcendence, causal links versus descriptive accuracy in referring, and comparing religious claims and holism. Annotation ©2015 Ringgold, Inc., Portland, OR (protoview.com)
Religious Education: Educating for Diversity raises issues that are central to the theory and practice of education, and in particular religious education, in modern liberal democracies characterized by diversity in its different forms. What kind of religious education is best equipped both to challenge prejudice and intolerance in society and to develop responsible and respectful relationships between people from different communities or with different commitments?
Two eminent educators address this question and propose contrasting answers. Attention is given to the aims of education and the contribution of religious education to the curriculum; historical forms of religious education; the nature of diversity in society; the roots of prejudice; different methodologies in religious education and their philosophical and religious commitments; and to positive strategies to enable religious education to realise its potential and contribute to the social and moral aims of liberal education.
