Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Rhetoric of Judging Well: The Conflicted Legacy of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy [Pehme köide]

  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 294 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 229x152x21 mm, kaal: 426 g
  • Sari: Rhetoric and Democratic Deliberation
  • Ilmumisaeg: 18-Feb-2025
  • Kirjastus: Pennsylvania State University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0271094850
  • ISBN-13: 9780271094854
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 294 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 229x152x21 mm, kaal: 426 g
  • Sari: Rhetoric and Democratic Deliberation
  • Ilmumisaeg: 18-Feb-2025
  • Kirjastus: Pennsylvania State University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0271094850
  • ISBN-13: 9780271094854
Teised raamatud teemal:
Known as the swing justice, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy provided the key vote determining which way the Supreme Court would decide on some of the most controversial cases in US history. Though criticized for his unpredictable rulings, Kennedy also gained a reputation for his opinion writing and, more so, for his legal rhetoric.

This book examines Justice Kennedys legacy through the lenses of rhetoric, linguistics, and constitutional law. Essays analyze Kennedys opinion writing in landmark cases such as Romer v. Evans, Obergefell v. Hodges, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Using the Justices rhetoric as an entry point into his legal philosophy, this volume reveals Kennedy as a justice with contradictions and blind spotsespecially on race, womens rights, and immigrationbut also as a man of empathy deeply committed to American citizenship.

A sophisticated assessment of Justice Kennedys jurisprudence, this book provides new insight into Kennedys legacy on the Court and into the role that rhetoric plays in judging and in communicating judgment.

In addition to the editors, the contributors to this volume are Ashutosh Bhagwat, Elizabeth C. Britt, Martin Camper, Michael Gagarin, James A. Gardner, Eugene Garver, Leslie Gielow Jacobs, Sean Patrick ORourke, Susan E. Provenzano, Clarke Rountree, Leticia M. Saucedo, Darien Shanske, Kathryn Stanchi, and Rebecca E. Zietlow.

Arvustused

The Rhetoric of Judging Well truly blazes a trail about how to take the rhetoric of legal reasoning out of the partisan, polarized world of legal journalism and bring it intelligibly into public discourse. Rhetoricians will gain copious insights about legal reasoning, and legal scholars will discover rhetorical tools for their research.

William M. Keith, coauthor of Beyond Civility: The Competing Obligations of Citizenship The Rhetoric of Judging Well offers a distinctive approach to legal rhetoric by providing a comprehensive and thorough account of the jurisprudence of a single, important justice. I know of no other book quite like it.

Austin Sarat, author of When Governments Break the Law: The Rule of Law and the Prosecution of the Bush Administration

Muu info

A sophisticated examination of Judge Kennedys legacy as a swing justice and the role of rhetoric in judging.
Acknowledgements

Introduction

Part
1. Judgment in Classical Rhetoric

1. Justice Kennedy and the Interpretation of Legal Texts: The Classical
Background

Michael Gagarin

2. Sex and Moral Pollution in the Rhetoric of Justice Kennedy

Eugene Garver

Part
2. Judgment in Stasis Theory

3. Justice Kennedys Definitional Construction of Gay Rights in Lawrence and
Obergefell: Legal Rhetorical Analysis with the Interpretive Stases

Martin Camper

4. Justice Kennedy, Natural Liberty, and Classical Stasis Theory: Advancing
Free Speech with Rhetorical Knowledge and Interpretive Argumentation

Susan E. Provenzano

5. Romer v. Evans: Justice Kennedy, Justice Scalia, and the Rhetoric of
Judging Well

Sean Patrick ORourke

Part
3. Judgment in Contemporary Rhetorical Theory

6. Constructing a Free Agent: Good Judgment in Justice Kennedys Lawrence
v. Texas Opinion

Clarke Rountree

7. Justice Kennedy and Natural Law Argumentation

Francis J. Mootz III

8. Justice Kennedy, Federalism, and the Nonproduction of Rhetorical
Knowledge

Darien Shanske

Part
4. Judgment and Justice Kennedys Ethos

9. Justice Kennedys Free Speech Optimism

Ashutosh Bhagwat

10. Strongmen and Neurotics: Visible Struggle and the Construction of
Judicial Ethos

James A. Gardner

11. The Anticlassification Topic and Equal-Liberty Template

Leslie Gielow Jacobs

Part
5. Justice Kennedys Misjudgments: Women, Race, and Immigrants

12. Performing a View from Nowhere: Justice Kennedys Denial of Embodied
Knowledge

Elizabeth C. Britt

13. Women in Justice Kennedys Jurisprudence

Kathryn Stanchi

14. Justice Kennedys Anticlassification Doctrine: Not Judging Well

Rebecca E. Zietlow

15. Whose Freedom? Justice Kennedys Sovereignty, Autonomy, and Liberty
Discourses in the Immigration Cases

Leticia M. Saucedo

Part
6. Assessment

16. Rhetorical Vision and Judgment: Did Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Judge
Well?

David A. Frank

List of Contributors

Index of Cases

Index of Names and Subjects
David A. Frank is Professor of Rhetoric at the University of Oregon. He is the coauthor of numerous books, including most recently Frames of Evil: The Holocaust as Horror in American Film.

Francis J. Mootz III is Professor of Law at the University of the Pacific. He is the author of Law, Hermeneutics and Rhetoric and Rhetorical Knowledge in Legal Practice and Critical Legal Theory.