Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Slurs and Thick Terms: When Language Encodes Values [Kõva köide]

Teised raamatud teemal:
Teised raamatud teemal:
What is the relation between language, communication, and values? In Slurs and Thick Terms: When Language Encodes Values, Bianca Cepollaro explores the ways in which certain pieces of evaluative language not only reflect speakers moral perspectives, but also contribute to promoting their evaluative stance. She focuses on slursthe prototypical example of hate speech, including racial and homophobic epithetsand so-called thick terms, that is, those expressions, much discussed in metaethics, that mix description and evaluation such as lewd, chaste, generous, or selfish. This book argues that in employing such terms, speakers not only say something purely factual about people and things, but also presuppose certain values, as if they were common ground among the conversation participants. Cepollaro illustrates how this linguistic mechanism effectively explains the pervasive social and moral effects of evaluative language. Using a multidisciplinary approach, she tackles issues in philosophy of language, linguistics, ethics, and metaethics. Moreover, the theoretical investigation takes into consideration and discusses empirical data from psychology and experimental philosophy.
Acknowledgments ix
Introduction xi
PART I THE PRESUPPOSITIONAL ACCOUNT OF HYBRID EVALUATIVES
1(94)
1 Hybrid Evaluatives: A New Class
3(20)
1.1 What Counts as a Hybrid Evaluative
3(9)
1.1.1 What Slurs Are About
5(2)
1.1.2 Distinguishing Thick Terms from Thin Terms
7(2)
1.1.3 Previous Suggestions for a Uniform Account
9(3)
1.2 The Projective Behavior of Slurs and Thick Terms
12(8)
1.2.1 Projection
12(4)
1.2.2 Rejection
16(2)
1.2.3 An Alternative Explanation of Projection
18(2)
1.3 Conclusion
20(3)
2 The Semantics of Hybrid Evaluatives
23(22)
2.1 The Evaluative Content
24(6)
2.1.1 Gradability
24(1)
2.1.2 Multidimensionality
25(2)
2.1.3 How to Interpret the Evaluative Content
27(2)
2.1.4 Inter-variation and Intra-variation
29(1)
2.2 The Descriptive Content
30(2)
2.3 When Things Go Wrong: Presuppositional Failure
32(9)
2.3.1 Reference and Extension
32(1)
2.3.2 What Exactly Is Presupposed
33(2)
2.3.3 Failure
35(4)
2.3.4 A Theory of Value
39(2)
2.4 Conclusion
41(4)
3 The Dynamics of Hybrid Evaluatives: Complicity, Propaganda, Rejection, Negotiation
45(16)
3.1 Slurs in Conversation
45(10)
3.1.1 Scenario I--Endorsement
46(1)
3.1.2 Scenario II--Complicity and Propaganda
46(4)
3.1.3 Scenario III--Rejection or How to Respond to Slurs and Hate Speech
50(3)
3.1.4 Slurs and Policies: Theoretical Proposals and Empirical Data
53(2)
3.2 Thick Terms: Negotiation and Conceptual Ethics
55(3)
3.3 Conclusion
58(3)
4 Defending a Uniform Presuppositional Account of Slurs and Thick Terms
61(16)
4.1 Defending the Uniformity Claim: The Residual Differences between Slurs and Thick Terms
61(5)
4.1.1 Descriptive and Evaluative Content
61(2)
4.1.2 The Projective Behavior
63(3)
4.2 Defending the Presuppositionality Claim
66(8)
4.2.1 Slurs and Presuppositions
67(5)
4.2.2 Thick Terms and Presuppositions
72(2)
4.3 Conclusion
74(3)
5 Non-standard Uses of Hybrid Evaluatives
77(18)
5.1 Attributive and Echoic Uses of Hybrid Evaluatives
78(6)
5.1.1 The Relevance-Theoretic Tools: Attributive and Echoic Uses of Language
78(2)
5.1.2 The Case of Evaluatives
80(4)
5.2 What's Special about the Reclamation of Slurs
84(7)
5.2.1 Initiation and Conventionalization
85(2)
5.2.2 In-groupness
87(3)
5.2.3 The Effects of Reclamation
90(1)
5.3 Conclusion
91(4)
PART II RIVAL THEORIES
95(54)
6 Truth-Conditional Theories: It's Just a Matter of Semantics
97(16)
6.1 Truth-Conditional Theories of Slurs
97(8)
6.1.1 The Case of Apparent Lack of Projection
99(4)
6.1.2 An Attempt to Explain Away Projection: Derogation and Offense
103(2)
6.2 A Truth-Conditional Theory of Thick Terms
105(5)
6.2.1 The Core of the Proposal
105(2)
6.2.2 Negative Strengthening
107(2)
6.2.3 Clausal Implicatures
109(1)
6.3 Conclusion
110(3)
7 Deflationary Theories: It's Just a Matter of Pragmatics
113(26)
7.1 Deflationary Accounts of Slurs
113(18)
7.1.1 Anderson and Lepore: Violating Prohibitions and Taboos
114(3)
7.1.2 Bolinger: Co-occurrence Expectations and Contrastive Preferences
117(6)
7.1.3 Nunberg: Markedness, Affiliation, and Manner Implicatures
123(3)
7.1.4 A Note on Markedness
126(2)
7.1.5 Slurs and Speech Acts
128(3)
7.2 A Deflationary Account of Thick Terms
131(6)
7.3 Conclusion
137(2)
8 An Alternative Hybrid Theory: Conventional Implicature
139(10)
8.1 Potts' Proposal
139(2)
8.2 Challenges
141(5)
8.2.1 Interaction with the At-Issue Content
141(4)
8.2.2 Complicity, Failure, and Backgroundness
145(1)
8.3 Conclusion
146(3)
Conclusion 149(2)
References 151(16)
About the Author 167
Bianca Cepollaro is research fellow of philosophy at the San Raffaele University.