Preface |
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xv | |
About the Authors |
|
xvii | |
|
|
1 | (10) |
|
|
1 | (4) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
Strategic Planning of Reverse and Closed-Loop Supply Chains |
|
|
11 | (8) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Selection of Used Products |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Collection Centers |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Recovery Facilities |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Optimization of Transportation of Goods |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Marketing Strategies |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Production Facilities |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Futurity of Used Products |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Selection of New Products |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Selection of Secondhand Markets |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Synchronization of Supply Chain Processes |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Supply Chain Performance Measurement |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
19 | (18) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Operational Planning of Reverse and Closed-Loop Supply Chains |
|
|
19 | (5) |
|
Strategic and Tactical Planning of Reverse and Closed-Loop Supply Chains |
|
|
24 | (7) |
|
|
31 | (6) |
|
|
31 | (6) |
|
Quantitative Modeling Techniques |
|
|
37 | (36) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Eigen Vector Method |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Fuzzy Multicriteria Analysis Method |
|
|
44 | (4) |
|
Quality Function Deployment |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Method of Total Preferences |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Linear Physical Programming |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) |
|
|
55 | (3) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
|
63 | (4) |
|
Process Capability Ratio (Cp) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
Process Capability Index (Cpk) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Geographical Information Systems |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Linear Integer Programming |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (4) |
|
|
69 | (4) |
|
Selection of Used Products |
|
|
73 | (14) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
First Model (Linear Integer Programming) |
|
|
73 | (5) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Modified Cost-Benefit Function |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
Linear Integer Programming Model |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Second Model (Linear Physical Programming) |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Class 1S Criteria (Smaller Is Better) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Class 2S Criteria (Larger Is Better) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (7) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Evaluation of Collection Centers |
|
|
87 | (38) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
First Model (Eigen Vector Method and Taguchi Loss Function) |
|
|
88 | (5) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Distance from Residential Area (DH) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Utilization of Incentives from Local Government (uI) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Per Capita Income of People in Residential Area (PI) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Incentives from Local Government (IG) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Evaluation Criteria for Second and Third Models |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
Criteria of Local Government Officials |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Criteria of Supply Chain Company Executives |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Second Model (Eigen Vector Method, TOPSIS, and Borda's Choice Rule) |
|
|
95 | (8) |
|
Phase I (Individual Decision Making) |
|
|
95 | (6) |
|
Phase II (Group Decision Making) |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
Third Model (Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic, TOPSIS, Borda's Rule) |
|
|
103 | (7) |
|
Phase I (Derivation of Impacts) |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
Phase II (Individual Decision Making) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
Phase III (Group Decision Making) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Fourth Model (ANP and Goal Programming) |
|
|
110 | (8) |
|
|
110 | (6) |
|
Application of Goal Programming |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Nomenclature for Problem Formulation |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
Fifth Model (Eigen Vector Method, Taguchi Loss Function, and Goal Programming) |
|
|
118 | (6) |
|
Application of Eigen Vector Method and Taguchi Loss Function |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
Application of Goal Programming |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Nomenclature Used in the Methodology |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Recovery Facilities |
|
|
125 | (28) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
First Model (Analytic Hierarchy Process) |
|
|
126 | (4) |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
Second Model (Linear Physical Programming) |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
Nomenclature for LPP Model |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
Criteria for Identification of Efficient Recovery Facilities |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Class 1S Criteria (Smaller is Better) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Class 2S Criteria (Larger Is Better) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Evaluation Criteria for Third and Fourth Models |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Criteria of Local Government Officials |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Criteria of Supply Chain Company Executives |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Third Model (Eigen Vector Method, TOPSIS, and Borda's Choice Rule) |
|
|
135 | (5) |
|
Phase I (Individual Decision Making) |
|
|
135 | (5) |
|
Phase II (Group Decision Making) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Fourth Model (Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic, TOPSIS, Borda's Choice Rule) |
|
|
140 | (8) |
|
Phase I (Derivation of Impacts) |
|
|
141 | (4) |
|
Phase II (Individual Decision Making) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
Phase III (Group Decision Making) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
Fifth Model (Two-Dimensional Chart) |
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
Optimization of Transportation of Products |
|
|
153 | (28) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
First Model (Linear Integer Programming) |
|
|
154 | (4) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Second Model (Linear Physical Programming) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Third Model (Goal Programming) |
|
|
161 | (7) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
162 | (4) |
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
Fourth Model (Linear Physical Programming) |
|
|
168 | (5) |
|
|
168 | (3) |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
Fifth Model (Fuzzy Goal Programming) |
|
|
173 | (6) |
|
|
173 | (5) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
Evaluation of Marketing Strategies |
|
|
181 | (20) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
First Model (Fuzzy Logic and TOPSIS) |
|
|
182 | (6) |
|
Drivers of Public Participation |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
|
183 | (5) |
|
Second Model (Fuzzy Logic, Quality Function Deployment, and Method of Total Preferences) |
|
|
188 | (4) |
|
Performance Aspects and Enablers |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
Third Model (Fuzzy Logic, Extent Analysis Method, and Analytic Network Process) |
|
|
192 | (6) |
|
Main Criteria and Subcriteria |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
193 | (5) |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
Evaluation of Production Facilities |
|
|
201 | (26) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
First Model (Fuzzy Logic and TOPSIS) |
|
|
202 | (10) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Environmentally Conscious Design (ECD) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing (ECM) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Attitude of Management (AMT) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (7) |
|
Second Model (Fuzzy Logic, Extent Analysis Method, and Analytic Network Process) |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
Third Model (Fuzzy Multicriteria Analysis Method) |
|
|
215 | (11) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Futurity of Used Products |
|
|
227 | (8) |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
Rules Used in Bayesian Updating |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
|
233 | (2) |
|
Selection of New Products |
|
|
235 | (10) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
236 | (2) |
|
Formulation of Fuzzy Cost-Benefit Function |
|
|
238 | (3) |
|
Total New Product Sale Revenue per Period (SR) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
Total Reuse Revenue per Period (uR) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
Total Recycle Revenue per Period (CR) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
Total New Product Production Cost per Period (MC) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
Total Collection Cost per Period (CC) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
Total Reprocessing Cost per Period (RC) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
Total Disposal Cost per Period (DC) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
Loss-of-Sale Cost per Period (LC) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
Selection of Secondhand Markets |
|
|
245 | (6) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
Performance Aspects and Enablers for Application of QFD |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
Selection of Potential Secondhand Markets |
|
|
246 | (4) |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
Design of a Synchronized Reverse Supply Chain |
|
|
251 | (6) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
Model (Two Design Experiments) |
|
|
251 | (3) |
|
First Experiment (Determination of Nominal Pool) |
|
|
251 | (2) |
|
Second Experiment (Determination of Variance Pool) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
|
254 | (3) |
|
|
255 | (2) |
|
|
257 | (14) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
Application of LPP to QFD Optimization |
|
|
258 | (3) |
|
|
258 | (2) |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
Reverse/Closed-Loop Supply Chain Performance Measurement |
|
|
261 | (8) |
|
Performance Aspects and Enablers |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
|
263 | (6) |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
|
271 | (4) |
Author index |
|
275 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
279 | |