Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Teaching Critical Thinking: Dialogue and Dialectic [Pehme köide]

Teised raamatud teemal:
Teised raamatud teemal:

This book, first published in 1990, takes a critical look at the major assumptions which support critical thinking programs and discovers many unresolved questions which threaten their viability. John McPeck argues that some of these assumptions are incoherent or run counter to common sense, while others are unsupported by the available empirical evidence. This title will be of interest to students of the philosophy of education.

Foreword ix
Michael Scriven
Preface xiii
Acknowledgments xv
Part I The Position
1 What kind of knowledge will transfer?
3(16)
2 Three competing conceptions of critical thinking
19(15)
3 Teaching critical thinking through the disciplines
34(14)
4 Some practical guidelines for teaching critical thinking
48(6)
5 Problems of evaluating critical thinking programs
54(13)
Part II Critiques of the Position
6 Thinking about critical thinking: philosophers can't go it alone Stephen P. Norris
67(8)
7 McPeck, informal logic, and the nature of critical thinking Harvey Siegel
75(11)
8 Response to Stephen Norris and Harvey Siegel on the analysis of Critical Thinking and Education John E. McPeck
86(16)
9 McPeck's mistakes Richard Paul
102(10)
10 Richard Paul's critique of Critical Thinking and Education John E. McPeck
112(13)
Notes 125(8)
Index 133
John E. McPeck