Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Temporality: Universals and Variation [Pehme köide]

(Rutgers University, USA)
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 348 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 246x172x18 mm, kaal: 540 g
  • Sari: Explorations in Semantics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 13-May-2014
  • Kirjastus: Wiley-Blackwell
  • ISBN-10: 1405190396
  • ISBN-13: 9781405190398
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 348 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 246x172x18 mm, kaal: 540 g
  • Sari: Explorations in Semantics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 13-May-2014
  • Kirjastus: Wiley-Blackwell
  • ISBN-10: 1405190396
  • ISBN-13: 9781405190398
Teised raamatud teemal:
Representing the culmination of fifteen years of research by the author, Temporality: Universals and Variation surveys the ways in which languages of different types refer to past, present, and future events and how these referents are related to the knowledge and attitudes of those involved in the dialogue.

Four major language types are examined in depth: tense-based English, tense-aspect-based Polish, aspect-based Chinese, and mood-based Kalaallisut. Each contributes to a series of logical representation languages, exemplifying four special cases of a common logical language which, Bittner argues, underlies all language types. The ways in which these four language types differ is in whether they choose to grammaticalize discourse reference to times (tense), events (aspect), and/or attitudes (mood), and how non-grammaticalized elements are inferred.

The common logical language, according to Bittner, is a dynamic update logic, building on DRT and Centering Theory, but with a novel architecture. For example, the distinction between focal versus peripheral attention plays a key role, parallel to focal versus peripheral vision.

This cutting-edge research is valuable for formal semanticists, philosophers of language, logicians, and computer scientists interested in cross-linguistic formal semantics, dynamic semantics, and direct semantic composition in Categorial Grammar.

List of Figures ix
Acknowledgments xiii
Glosses xv
Introduction 1(12)
Part I Semantic Universals 13(178)
1 Direct Semantic Composition
15(26)
1.1 Simple Type Logic (TL0)
16(1)
1.2 A CG.TL0 Fragment of English
17(6)
1.3 Dynamic Type Logic (DL0)
23(4)
1.4 A CG.DL0 Fragment of English
27(7)
1.5 Centering: A Blind Spot of English-Based Logics
34(7)
2 Nominal Reference with Centering
41(26)
2.1 Center v. Periphery: Anaphora to Structured Lists
42(6)
2.2 Kalaallisut Third Person Inflections as Top-Level Anaphora
48(5)
2.3 Mandarin Third Person Features as Top-Level Anaphora
53(4)
2.4 English Third Person Pronouns as Shallow Anaphora
57(4)
2.5 Simple Update with Centering (UC0)
61(6)
3 Tense as Temporal Centering
67(26)
3.1 Polish Third Person Inflections as Top-Level Anaphora
68(1)
3.2 Polish Tenses as Top-Level Temporal Reference
69(4)
3.3 English Tenses as Temporal (In)definites
73(5)
3.4 English Tenses as Top-Level Temporal Reference
78(7)
3.5 UC0 with Temporal Centering (UCτ)
85(8)
4 Aspect as Eventuality Centering
93(25)
4.1 Polish Aspect Features v. Inflections
94(7)
4.2 Mandarin Aspect Features v. Particles
101(7)
4.3 English Aspectual
108(4)
4.4 UCτ with Mereology (UCepsilonω+)
112(6)
5 Quantification as Reference to Sets
118(24)
5.1 Nominal Quantification and Anaphora
119(8)
5.2 Nominal Quantification and Temporal Reference
127(3)
5.3 Temporal Quantification and Anaphora
130(4)
5.4 UCτ+ with Discourse Referents for Sets (UCepsilonω||)
134(8)
6 Mood as Illocutionary Centering
142(24)
6.1 Illocutionary Moods with(out) Reportative Recentering
143(3)
6.2 (Not-)at-Issue Content as Modal Discourse Reference
146(4)
6.3 (Not-)at-Issue with Start-Up Illocutionary Referents
150(7)
6.4 Dependent Moods as Perspectival (Re)centering
157(3)
6.5 UCδ|| with Illocutionary Referents (UCepsilonω||)
160(6)
7 (In)direct Speech and Attitude Reports
166(25)
7.1 Mood with(out) Reportative Recentering Revisited
167(7)
7.2 At-Issue Reports with Finite Complements
174(5)
7.3 At-Issue Reports with Non-Finite Complements
179(6)
7.4 UC: Combining UCτ|| and UCepsilonω||
185(6)
Part II Temporal Variation 191(107)
8 Tense-Based Temporality in English
193(26)
8.1 Indexical Past with(out) Recentering Aspect
194(6)
8.2 Indexical Non-Past with(out) Recentering Aspect
200(3)
8.3 Reports: Speaker's View of Subject's (Non-)Past
203(3)
8.4 Quantification: Tenses in Distributive Contexts
206(3)
8.5 A CG.UC Fragment of English
209(10)
9 Tense-Aspect-Based Temporality in Polish
219(27)
9.1 Relative Past (Im)perfective
220(6)
9.2 Relative Non-Past (Im)perfective
226(4)
9.3 Reports: Subject's (Non-)Past
230(3)
9.4 Quantification: Distributed (Im)perfectives
233(4)
9.5 A CG.UC Fragment of Polish
237(9)
10 Aspect-Based Temporality in Mandarin
246(26)
10.1 Non-Future: Verifiable Topic State
247(6)
10.2 Future: Prospective Topic State or Comment
253(4)
10.3 Reports: Attitudinal Topic State or Comment
257(3)
10.4 Quantification: Topical Habit or Distributive Comment
260(2)
10.5 A CG.UC Fragment of Mandarin
262(10)
11 Mood-Based Temporality in Kalaallisut
272(26)
11.1 Non-Future: Verifiable Eventualities
273(5)
11.2 Future: Verifiable Eventualities with Future c-Points
278(4)
11.3 Reports: Verifiability from Agent's Perspective
282(5)
11.4 Quantification: Verifiable Habits
287(3)
11.5 A CG.UC Fragment of Kalaallisut
290(8)
Conclusion 298(10)
Bibliography 308(11)
Author Index 319(4)
Subject Index 323
Maria Bittner is a Professor of Linguistics at Rutgers University and a member of the editorial boards of Journal of Semantics and Semantics & Pragmatics. She is well known for her work on cross-linguistic formal semantics, dynamic semantics, and syntax-semantics interface, with special focus on Kalaallisut (Eskimo-Aleut: Greenland). Her early research in LF-based static semantics culminated in Case, Scope, and Binding (1994).