Acronyms and Abbreviations |
|
xv | |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
Defining the Problem: Partner Panel |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
Organization of This Proceedings |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
2 Background for the Workshop |
|
|
9 | (12) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Harmonizing the Nutrient Intake Values: Phase 1 |
|
|
10 | (7) |
|
Applications and Uses of Nutrient Intake Recommendations |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
3 Harmonization Frameworks |
|
|
21 | (22) |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
Framework Consultation Process: Key Issues and Conclusions |
|
|
23 | (5) |
|
Endpoints: Differences When Considering Deficiency Versus Chronic Disease |
|
|
28 | (7) |
|
Guiding Principles for Developing Dietary Reference Intakes Based on Chronic Disease: Highlights of the Consensus Report |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
|
38 | (5) |
|
4 Current Models for Establishing Intake Recommendations |
|
|
43 | (14) |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
Dietary Reference Intakes: Harmonized Nutrient Standards for Canada and the United States |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
South Australia and New Zealand |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
South Korea: 2015 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (6) |
|
5 Exploring Approaches to Evaluating the Evidence |
|
|
57 | (26) |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
Tools for Evaluating Strength and Quality of Evidence |
|
|
59 | (6) |
|
Global Systematic Reviews: How Can It Be Done? |
|
|
65 | (7) |
|
Risk-Benefit Assessment of Foods in a European Perspective |
|
|
72 | (7) |
|
|
79 | (4) |
|
6 Contextual Factors: Host, Diet/Environment, and Health Status |
|
|
83 | (34) |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
The Role of the Host: Genetic Variation |
|
|
86 | (7) |
|
The Role of the Host: Physiology Adaptation |
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
The Role of Health Status: Infection |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
The Role of Health Status: Aging |
|
|
100 | (5) |
|
The Role of Diet and Environment in Setting Nutrient Bioavailability Factors for Estimating Dietary Requirements |
|
|
105 | (5) |
|
The Role of Diet on Nutrient Bioavailability: Issues for Habitual Diets of Asian Countries |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
7 Breakout Discussions: Applications, Facilitating Quality, and Cost-Effectiveness |
|
|
117 | (10) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
Question 1 Advantages of Global Harmonization of Methodologies |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Question 2 Additional Resources and Expertise to Facilitate Adoption of a Harmonized Approach |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Question 3 Likely Barriers and Challenges to Achieving Global Harmonization |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Synthesis of Breakout Discussion |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
8 Exploring Advantages, Barriers, And Challenges To Global Harmonization Of Methodologies For Nutrient Intake Recommendations |
|
|
127 | (16) |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
EURRECA (European Micronutrient Recommendations Aligned) |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
|
138 | (5) |
|
9 Moving the Conversation Forward |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
Chair's Three Strategic Messages |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
|
147 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
155 | (6) |
|
B Speaker and Facilitator Biographies |
|
|
161 | |