Introduction |
|
xi | |
CHAPTER 1. SHOULD TREES HAVE STANDING?: TOWARD LEGAL RIGHTS FOR NATURAL OBJECTS |
|
1 | |
|
I. Introduction: The Unthinkable |
|
|
1 | |
|
II. Toward Rights for the Environment |
|
|
3 | |
|
III. The Legal-Operational Aspects |
|
|
4 | |
|
(1) What It Means to Be a Holder of Legal Rights |
|
|
4 | |
|
(2) The Rightlessness of Natural Objects at Common Law |
|
|
5 | |
|
(3) Toward Having Standing in Its Own Right |
|
|
8 | |
|
(4) Toward Recognition of Its Own Injuries |
|
|
13 | |
|
(5) Toward Being a Beneficiary in Its Own Right |
|
|
16 | |
|
(6) Toward Rights in Substance |
|
|
17 | |
|
(7) Do We Really Have to Put It That Way? |
|
|
22 | |
|
IV. The Psychic and Socio-Psychic Aspects |
|
|
23 | |
CHAPTER 2. DOES THE CLIMATE HAVE STANDING? |
|
33 | |
|
|
33 | |
|
II. The Law of Standing: An Overview |
|
|
35 | |
|
(1) Duty Owing and Zone of Interests |
|
|
37 | |
|
|
38 | |
|
|
42 | |
|
|
43 | |
|
III. Standing to Force Disclosures |
|
|
44 | |
|
IV. Standing's Many Fronts |
|
|
49 | |
|
(1) Ordinary Standing for "Ordinary" Economic Injury |
|
|
50 | |
|
|
51 | |
|
(3) Executive Standing in International Affairs |
|
|
53 | |
|
(4) Citizens' Standing to Force the Executive's Hand in Foreign Affairs |
|
|
54 | |
|
(5) Citizens' Standing to Force the Executive's Hand in Domestic Affairs |
|
|
55 | |
|
(6) Standing by a Designated Trustee |
|
|
57 | |
|
(7) Citizens' Standing to Force the Trustee's Hand |
|
|
57 | |
|
(8) Citizens' Standing without Statutory Basis (Public Trust Doctrine) |
|
|
59 | |
|
(9) Standing of Noncitizens |
|
|
60 | |
|
V. Suits in the Name of Natural Objects |
|
|
61 | |
|
|
61 | |
|
(2) Could Standing for Nonhuman Be Expanded? |
|
|
62 | |
|
(3) Would Expanded Standing in the Name of Nonhuman Make Any Difference? |
|
|
64 | |
|
(4) Filing Suits on Behalf of Nature Is a Better Fit with the Real Grievances |
|
|
65 | |
|
(5) Suits on Behalf of Nature Are Better Suited to Moral Development |
|
|
65 | |
|
(6) Is Legal Representation on Behalf of Animals and Nature Really Feasible? |
|
|
66 | |
|
(7) The Advantages of Special, Statutorily Provided Guardians and Trustees |
|
|
66 | |
|
(8) The Guardian Approach May Be Superior to the Alternative Standing Strategies from the Perspective of Subsequent Preclusion Doctrines |
|
|
68 | |
|
(9) Advance Warning: The "Canary in the Mine" Rationale |
|
|
68 | |
|
(10) Protecting Third-Party Interests in Negotiations and Settlements |
|
|
69 | |
|
VI. So, Where Do We Stand on Climate Change? |
|
|
70 | |
|
(1) Why Has Progress Seemed So Slow? |
|
|
70 | |
|
(2) What Role Could Climate-Related Litigation Play? |
|
|
74 | |
CHAPTER 3. AGRICULTURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT: CHALLENGES FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM |
|
79 | |
|
|
79 | |
|
(1) The Historical Impact of Agriculture |
|
|
79 | |
|
|
80 | |
|
|
81 | |
|
|
81 | |
|
(2) Making Farmland Sustainable |
|
|
82 | |
|
(3) Reducing Agriculture's Environmentally Damaging Spillover Effects |
|
|
82 | |
|
(4) Tempering Conscription of the Nonagricultural Landscape |
|
|
82 | |
|
(5) The Promises and Threats of Technology |
|
|
83 | |
|
III. Some Proposed Responses |
|
|
84 | |
|
|
84 | |
|
|
85 | |
|
(3) Reducing Pressure to Conscript the Nonagricultural Landscape |
|
|
85 | |
|
(4) Responding to Technological Innovation |
|
|
87 | |
|
|
88 | |
CHAPTER 4. CAN THE OCEANS BE HARBORED? |
|
89 | |
|
I. A Four-Step Plan for the Twenty-First Century |
|
|
89 | |
|
|
89 | |
|
(a) The Fundamental Model: What Is Going Wrong? |
|
|
90 | |
|
(b) Step 1: Eliminate or Reduce Harvest-Increasing Subsidies |
|
|
92 | |
|
(c) Step 2: Improve and Extend Resource Management |
|
|
93 | |
|
(d) Step 3: Charge for Use |
|
|
93 | |
|
(e) Step 4: An Oceanic Trust Fund |
|
|
95 | |
|
II. Nonfishing Extraction Sectors |
|
|
96 | |
|
|
97 | |
|
IV. A Guardian for the Oceans |
|
|
100 | |
|
|
101 | |
CHAPTER 5. SHOULD WE ESTABLISH A GUARDIAN FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS? |
|
103 | |
|
I. Background: The Maltese Proposal |
|
|
103 | |
|
(1) Are Future Persons Really Voiceless? |
|
|
103 | |
|
(2) For Whom (or What) Should a Guardian Speak? |
|
|
104 | |
|
(3) Are the Moral Arguments Disparaging the Rights of Future Generations Critical to the Guardianship Proposal? |
|
|
105 | |
|
(4) Which "Future Generation" Is the Guardian's Principal? |
|
|
106 | |
|
(5) Who Should Serve as Guardian? |
|
|
106 | |
|
(6) Where Should a Guardian Be Situated? |
|
|
107 | |
|
(7) What Official Functions Should the Guardian Serve? |
|
|
108 | |
|
(8) What Should Be the Guardian's Objectives? |
|
|
109 | |
|
(a) Resource-Regarding Standards |
|
|
109 | |
|
(b) Utility-Regarding Standards |
|
|
110 | |
|
(c) Efficient Level of Harm and Harm-Avoidance |
|
|
110 | |
|
(d) Precaution Against Selected Calamities and Safeguarding Specific Assets |
|
|
111 | |
|
(e) Avoiding "Irreversible Harm" |
|
|
112 | |
|
|
112 | |
CHAPTER 6. REFLECTIONS ON "SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT" |
|
115 | |
|
I. The Underlying Geopolitical Strains |
|
|
116 | |
|
II. What Are Our Obligations to the Future? |
|
|
117 | |
|
(1) Sustainable Development as a Welfare-Transfer Constraint |
|
|
118 | |
|
(2) Sustainable Development as Preservationism |
|
|
121 | |
|
(3) The Rights of the Living |
|
|
123 | |
CHAPTER 7. HOW TO HEAL THE PLANET |
|
125 | |
|
|
125 | |
|
(1) Invasion of Territories |
|
|
128 | |
|
|
129 | |
|
(3) A Voice for the Environment Global Commons Guardians |
|
|
130 | |
|
|
132 | |
|
(5) Financing the Repair: The Global Commons Trust Fund |
|
|
134 | |
|
(6) Implementing a Global Commons Trust Fund |
|
|
134 | |
|
|
135 | |
|
|
135 | |
|
|
135 | |
|
|
136 | |
|
(11) Areas in Need of the Global Commons Trust Fund |
|
|
137 | |
|
|
138 | |
CHAPTER 8. IS ENVIRONMENTALISM DEAD? |
|
141 | |
|
|
141 | |
|
II. What Movement, Exactly, Is Faltering, and What Should Our Expectations Be? |
|
|
143 | |
|
III. Indicators of Success and Failure |
|
|
144 | |
|
(1) Indices of Public Knowledge: Environmental Literacy |
|
|
145 | |
|
(2) Indices of Attitudes and Preferences |
|
|
146 | |
|
(3) Indices of Willingness to Contribute to Environmental Groups |
|
|
147 | |
|
(4) Indices of Environmentally-Sensitized Individual Action |
|
|
147 | |
|
(5) Indices of Influence on lawmaking |
|
|
149 | |
|
(6) Public Sector Funding |
|
|
151 | |
|
|
151 | |
|
(8) Indices of Miscellaneous Actions |
|
|
152 | |
|
(9) Actual (Direct) Indicators of Environmental Health |
|
|
152 | |
|
|
153 | |
|
|
154 | |
|
|
155 | |
|
|
155 | |
|
|
156 | |
Epilogue |
|
159 | |
Notes |
|
177 | |
Index |
|
237 | |