Acknowledgments |
|
xi | |
Authors |
|
xiii | |
|
Section I Introduction to Adaptive Survey Design |
|
|
|
|
3 | (6) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.2 Intended Audience and Assumed Prior Knowledge |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
2 Adaptive Survey Design: What Is It? |
|
|
9 | (28) |
|
|
9 | (10) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
2.1.4 Need for More Flexible Survey Designs to Address Uncertainty in Data Collection |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
2.1.5 Common Survey Design Paradigm |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (7) |
|
2.2.1 Adaptive Survey Design |
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.2.3 RD with ASD Features |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
2.4.1 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Surveys |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.4.1.1 Propensity-Based Assignment to Interviewers |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.4.1.2 Propensity-Based Stopping of Sample Cases ("Interactive Case Management") |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 The Dutch Labor Force Survey |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.4.3 National Survey of Family Growth |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (5) |
|
Section II Preparing an Adaptive Survey Design |
|
|
|
|
37 | (20) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
3.2 Goals of Stratification |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (11) |
|
3.3.1 Response Propensity Variation |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Regression Diagnostics |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.3.4 Other Methods for Creating Strata |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
3.3.5.1 The National Survey of Family Growth |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
3.3.5.2 Labor Force Survey |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
3.3.6 Summary and Recommendations |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
4 Interventions and Design Features |
|
|
57 | (20) |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (6) |
|
4.5.1 The National Survey of Family Growth |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
4.5.1.1 Case Prioritization |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
4.5.1.2 Phased Design Features |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
4.5.1.3 Interviewer-Level Management Intervention |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
5 Models for Nonresponse in Adaptive Survey Design |
|
|
77 | (12) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
5.2 Goals of Statistical Models in ASD |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (4) |
|
5.3.1 Reasons for Using Models for Nonresponse |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Key Components in Models for Nonresponse |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
5.4 Monitoring Nonresponse |
|
|
82 | (4) |
|
5.4.1 Survey-Level Measures |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Estimate-Level Measures |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
Section III Implementing an Adaptive Survey Design |
|
|
|
|
89 | (22) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (9) |
|
|
91 | (5) |
|
6.2.2 Cost Model Parameter Estimation |
|
|
96 | (3) |
|
|
99 | (5) |
|
6.3.1 Stages of Implementing Adaptive Survey Designs |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (3) |
|
|
104 | (5) |
|
6.4.1 The Dutch LFS-Continued |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
7 Optimization of Adaptive Survey Design |
|
|
111 | (14) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
7.2 Approaches for ASD Optimization |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
7.3 Numerical Optimization Problems |
|
|
114 | (5) |
|
7.3.1 Mathematical and Statistical Optimization |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
7.3.2 Simulation on Existing Data |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
|
119 | (4) |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
8 Robustness of Adaptive Survey Designs |
|
|
125 | (18) |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
8.2 Metrics to Assess the Robustness of ASDs |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
|
130 | (6) |
|
8.3.1 Strategies to Evaluate Robustness of Designs |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
8.3.2 The Dutch LFS: An Example |
|
|
131 | (5) |
|
8.4 Bayesian Adaptive Survey Design Network |
|
|
136 | (3) |
|
|
139 | (4) |
|
Section IV Advanced Features of Adaptive Survey Design |
|
|
|
9 Indicators to Support Prioritization and Optimization |
|
|
143 | (34) |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
|
145 | (9) |
|
9.2.1 Type 1 Indicators (Based on Covariates Only) |
|
|
145 | (6) |
|
9.2.2 Type 2 Indicators (Based on Covariates and Survey Variables) |
|
|
151 | (3) |
|
9.3 Indicators Decomposing the Variance of Response Propensities |
|
|
154 | (5) |
|
9.3.1 Partial Variable Level |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
9.3.2 Partial Category Level |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
159 | (11) |
|
9.4.1 Response Probabilities and Propensities |
|
|
159 | (5) |
|
9.4.2 Bias Approximations of Unadjusted and Adjusted Response Means |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
9.4.3 Bias Intervals under Not-Missing-at-Random Nonresponse |
|
|
166 | (4) |
|
9.5 Indicators and Their Relation to Nonresponse Bias |
|
|
170 | (4) |
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
10 Adaptive Survey Design and Adjustment for Nonresponse |
|
|
177 | (22) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
10.2 Empirical Evidence for Bias Reduction After Adjustment |
|
|
179 | (6) |
|
10.3 Theoretical Conditions for Bias Reduction After Adjustment |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
10.4 Adjustment of Nonresponse to ASDs |
|
|
187 | (5) |
|
|
192 | (4) |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
Section V The Future of Adaptive Survey Design |
|
|
|
11 Adaptive Survey Design and Measurement Error |
|
|
199 | (24) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
11.2 Single-Purpose Surveys |
|
|
201 | (12) |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
11.2.2 Mathematical Optimization |
|
|
204 | (5) |
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
11.3 Multi-Purpose Surveys and Panels |
|
|
213 | (8) |
|
11.3.1 Response Quality Indicators and Propensities |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
11.3.2 Quality and Cost Functions Based on Response Quality Propensities |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
11.3.3 Mathematical Optimization |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
|
221 | (2) |
|
12 The Future of Adaptive Survey Design |
|
|
223 | (8) |
References |
|
231 | (12) |
Index |
|
243 | |