Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Agent-based Models and Causal Inference

(Sorbonne University, Paris, France)
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 88,86 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Raamatukogudele
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Agent-based Models and Causal Inference

Scholars of causal inference have given little credence to the possibility that ABMs could be an important tool in warranting causal claims. Manzos book makes a convincing case that this is a mistake. The book starts by describing the impressive progress that ABMs have made as a credible methodology in the last several decades. It then goes on to compare the inferential threats to ABMs versus the traditional methods of RCTs, regression, and instrumental variables showing that they have a common vulnerability of being based on untestable assumptions. The book concludes by looking at four examples where an analysis based on ABMs complements and augments the evidence for specific causal claims provided by other methods. Manzo has done a most convincing job of showing that ABMs can be an important resource in any researchers tool kit. Christopher Winship, Diker-Tishman Professor of Sociology, Harvard University, USA

Agent-based Models and Causal Inference is a first-rate contribution to the debate on, and practice of, causal claims. With exemplary rigor, systematic precision and pedagogic clarity, this book contrasts the assumptions about causality that undergird agent-based models, experimental methods, and statistically based observational methods, discusses the challenges these methods face as far as inferences go, and, in light of this discussion, elaborates the case for combining these methods respective strengths: a remarkable achievement. Ivan Ermakoff, Professor of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

Agent-based models are a uniquely powerful tool for understanding how patterns in society may arise in often surprising and counter-intuitive ways. This book offers a strong and deeply reflected argument for how ABMs can do much more: add to actual empirical explanation. The work is of great value to all social scientists interested in learning how computational modelling can help unraveling the complexity of the real social world. Andreas Flache, Professor of Sociology at the University of Groningen, Netherlands

Agent-based Models and Causal Inference is an important and much-needed contribution to sociology and computational social science. The book provides a rigorous new contribution to current understandings of the foundation of causal inference and justification in the social sciences. It provides a powerful and cogent alternative to standard statistical causal-modeling approaches to causation. Especially valuable is Manzos careful analysis of the conditions under which an agent-based simulation is relevant to causal inference. The book represents an exceptional contribution to sociology, the philosophy of social science, and the epistemology of simulations and models. Daniel Little, Professor of philosophy, University of Michigan, USA

Agent-based Models and Causal Inference delivers an insightful investigation into the conditions under which different quantitative methods can legitimately hold to be able to establish causal claims. The book compares agent-based computational methods with randomized experiments, instrumental variables, and various types of causal graphs.

Organized in two parts, Agent-based Models and Causal Inference connects the literature from various fields, including causality, social mechanisms, statistical and experimental methods for causal inference, and agent-based computation models to help show that causality means different things within different methods for causal analysis, and that persuasive causal claims can only be built at the intersection of these various methods.

Readers will also benefit from the inclusion of:





A thorough comparison between agent-based computation models to randomized experiments, instrumental variables, and several types of causal graphs A compelling argument that observational and experimental methods are not qualitatively superior to simulation-based methods in their ability to establish causal claims Practical discussions of how statistical, experimental and computational methods can be combined to produce reliable causal inferences

Perfect for academic social scientists and scholars in the fields of computational social science, philosophy, statistics, experimental design, and ecology, Agent-based Models and Causal Inference will also earn a place in the libraries of PhD students seeking a one-stop reference on the issue of causal inference in agent-based computational models.
List of Acronyms
xi
List of Tables
xii
Preface xiii
The Book in a Nutshell xvii
Introduction 1(8)
1 The Book's Question
3(3)
2 The Book's Structure
6(3)
Part I Conceptual and Methodological Clarifications
9(40)
1 The Diversity of Views on Causality and Mechanisms
11(14)
1.1 Causal Inference
11(2)
1.2 Dependence and Production Accounts of Causality
13(4)
1.3 Horizontal and Vertical Accounts of Mechanisms
17(5)
1.3.1 Vertical versus Horizontal View
19(2)
1.3.2 Horizontal versus Vertical View
21(1)
1.4 Causality and Mechanism Accounts, and ABM's Perception
22(3)
2 Agent-based Models and the Vertical View on Mechanism
25(8)
2.1 ABMs and Object-oriented Programming
26(1)
2.2 ABMs and Heterogeneity
27(1)
2.3 ABMs and Micro-foundations
28(1)
2.4 ABMs and Interdependence
28(1)
2.5 ABMs and Time
29(1)
2.6 ABMs and Multi-level Settings
30(1)
2.7 Variables within Statistical Methods and ABMs
31(2)
3 The Diversity of Agent-based Models
33(16)
3.1 Abstract versus Data-driven ABMs: An Old Opposition
34(2)
3.2 Abstract versus Data-driven ABMs: Recent Trends
36(2)
3.3 Theoretical, Input, and Output Realism
38(2)
3.4 Different Paths to More Realistic ABMs
40(9)
3.4.1 "Theoretically Blind" Data-driven ABMs
41(4)
3.4.2 "Theoretically Informed" Data-driven ABMs
45(4)
Part 2 Data and Arguments in Causal Inference
49(66)
4 Agent-based Models and Causal Inference
51(18)
4.1 ABMs as Inferential Devices
52(7)
4.1.1 The Role of "Theoretical Realism"
52(2)
4.1.2 The Role of "Output Realism" and Empirical Validation
54(1)
4.1.3 The Role of "Input Realism" and Empirical Calibration
55(2)
4.1.4 In Principle Conditions for Causally Relevant ABMs
57(1)
4.1.5 Can Data-driven ABMs Produce Information on Their Own?
58(1)
4.2 In Practice Limitations
59(3)
4.2.1 ABMs' Granularity and Data Availability
59(2)
4.2.2 ABM's Granularity and Data Embeddedness
61(1)
4.3 From-Within-the-Method Reliability Tools
62(7)
4.3.1 Sensitivity Analysis
64(1)
4.3.2 Robustness Analysis
65(1)
4.3.3 Dispersion Analysis
65(1)
4.3.4 Model Analysis
66(3)
5 Causal Inference in Experimental and Observational Methods
69(26)
5.1 Causal Inference: Cautionary Tales
71(2)
5.2 In Practice Untestable Assumptions
73(6)
5.2.1 RCTs and Heterogeneity
73(1)
5.2.2 IVs and the "Relevance" Condition
74(2)
5.2.3 DAGs, Causal Discovery Algorithms and Graph Indistinguishability
76(3)
5.3 In Principle Untestable Assumptions
79(6)
5.3.1 RCTs and "Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption" (SUTVA)
79(2)
5.3.2 IVs and the "Exclusion" Condition
81(2)
5.3.3 DAGs and Strategies for Causal Identification
83(1)
5.3.3.1 DAGs and the "Backdoor" Criterion
83(1)
5.3.3.2 DAGs and the "Front Door" Criterion
84(1)
5.4 Are ABMs, Experimental and Observational Methods Fundamentally Similar?
85(9)
5.4.1 Objection 1: ABM Lacks "Formal" Assumptions
86(3)
5.4.2 Objection 2: ABM Lacks "Materiality"
89(2)
5.4.3 Objection 3: ABMs Lack "Robustness"
91(3)
5.5 A Common Logic: "Abduction"
94(1)
6 Method Diversity and Causal Inference
95(20)
6.1 Causal Pluralism, Causal Exclusivism, and Evidential Pluralism
97(2)
6.2 A Pragmatist Account of Evidence
99(2)
6.3 Evidential Pluralism and "Coherentism"
101(3)
6.4 When is Diverse Evidence Most Relevant?
104(2)
6.5 Examples of Method Synergies
106(9)
6.5.1 Obesity: ABMs and Regression Models
106(3)
6.5.2 Network Properties: ABMs and SIENA Models
109(2)
6.5.3 HIV prevalence: ABMs and RCTs
111(2)
6.5.4 HIV treatments: ABMs and DAG-based identification strategies
113(2)
Coda
115(12)
1 Possible Objections
116(5)
1.1 Causation is Not Constitution
117(1)
1.2 Lack of a Specific Research Strategy
118(1)
1.3 A Limited Methodological Spectrum
119(2)
2 Summary
121(6)
References 127(22)
Index 149
Gianluca Manzo is a professor of sociology at Sorbonne University and a fellow of the European Academy of Sociology. He has held various positions at institutions across the world including Nuffield College, Columbia University, the European University Institute (EUI), and the Universities of Oslo, Barcelona, Cologne, and Trento.