Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Arabic Indefinites, Interrogatives, and Negators: A Linguistic History of Western Dialects

(Professor of Arabic, The American University of Beirut)
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 74,72 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This book traces the origins and development of the Arabic grammatical markers/si, which is found in interrogatives, negators, and indefinite determiners over a broad dialect area that stretches from the southern Levant to North Africa and includes dialects of Yemen and Oman. David Wilmsen draws on data from old vernacular Arabic texts and from a variety of Arabic dialects, and shows that, contrary to much of the literature on the diachrony of this morpheme,s/si does not derive from Arabic say 'thing'. Instead, he argues that it dates back to a pre-Arabic stage of West Semitic and probably has its origins in a Semitic demonstrative pronoun. On this theory, Arabicsay could in fact derive from s/si, and not vice versa.

The book demonstrates the significance of the Arabic dialects in understanding the history of Arabic and the Semitic languages, and claims that modern Arabic dialects could not have developed from Classical Arabic. It will be of interest to historical linguists of all persuasions from graduate level upwards, particularly all those working on Arabic and other Semitic languages.
Series preface x
List of figures and tables
xi
Transcription and notation xii
1 Introduction: Theory, conventions, and the assessment of facts
1(20)
1.1 Arabic in linguistic theory
4(3)
1.2 A facts-first approach to theory and a theory-free approach to facts
7(2)
1.3 A guide to the perplexing: chapter summaries
9(3)
1.4 A coming to terms
12(7)
1.5 A repayment of debts
19(2)
2 On the age and origins of spoken Arabic vernaculars: An unresolved question
21(23)
2.1 Old and New Arabic
22(2)
2.2 New Arabic is old
24(4)
2.3 Retentions and innovations
28(1)
2.4 Shared Semitic retentions
29(7)
2.5 Shared dialectal retentions
36(3)
2.6 In conclusion, the way forward
39(5)
3 fis wa biddis: The functions of Si
44(20)
3.1 Tracing the origin and development of the pseudo-verb bidd-
46(3)
3.2 The -s of biddis
49(1)
3.3 Conventional views
50(1)
3.4 Grammaticalization of Say
50(1)
3.5 Partitive Si
51(2)
3.6 Polar interrogative Si
53(3)
3.7 Rhetorically negative Si
56(1)
3.8 Negative Si
57(2)
3.9 Distribution of Si
59(4)
3.10 Conclusion
63(1)
4 Andalusi Arabic negators and interrogatives: Early evidence of grammatical Si
64(26)
4.1 Indefinite and negative Si in Andalusi Arabic
66(4)
4.2 A Jespersen's Cycle?
70(2)
4.3 Interrogative or negative is?
72(3)
4.4 Rhetorical questions in Arabic
75(4)
4.5 Arabic interrogatives as exclamatives
79(2)
4.6 Orthographic idiosyncrasies
81(6)
4.7 Conclusion
87(3)
5 Interrogation and negation with Si in North African and Levantine Arabic
90(29)
5.1 Shared retentions in Andalusi Arabic, North African Arabic, and Maltese
92(4)
5.2 Copular interrogatives in modern North African dialects
96(6)
5.3 A Horani case study
102(8)
5.4 Horani analogues in other Arabic varieties
110(5)
5.5 Conclusion
115(4)
6 Origins of grammatical Si: Southern Arabia or the Levant?
119(29)
6.1 Possible origins
120(4)
6.2 A shared West Semitic innovation
124(2)
6.3 Genera and geography
126(1)
6.4 Dialects with and without negative Si
127(3)
6.5 A pre-diaspora southern Arab presence in the Fertile Crescent
130(3)
6.6 Arab Christians in the pre-Islamic Fertile Crescent
133(4)
6.7 An ancient Arab presence in the Fertile Crescent
137(3)
6.8 Levantine or Yemeni?
140(6)
6.9 Conclusion
146(2)
7 Proto-Semitic and Proto-Arabic origins of grammatical Si
148(32)
7.1 Early evidence of negator -s
149(5)
7.2 The Semitics of Si
154(7)
7.3 Implications for Arabic
161(2)
7.4 Implications for theory
163(1)
7.5 Processes of grammaticalization
164(3)
7.6 Degrammaticalization of Si
167(2)
7.7 Derivational pathways of grammatical Si
169(4)
7.8 A reassertion of theory: Croft's Cycle, not Jespersen's
173(3)
7.9 A reaffirmation of an assumption: negating with ma is early
176(1)
7.10 Conclusion
177(3)
8 On explanation and theory in Arabic linguistics
180(29)
8.1 Formal approaches to Arabic: mistaken, misplaced, and misguided
180(8)
8.2 Formal approaches to grammatical si
188(10)
8.3 Negator - s and negative polarity
198(6)
8.4 Conclusion
204(5)
Afterword 209(5)
Appendix: Points of divergence between written and spoken Arabic 214(2)
References 216(23)
Index 239
David Wilmsen is Professor of Arabic in the Department of Arabic and Near Eastern Languages at The American University of Beirut. He has spent 30 years studying Arabic, and 20 years living in Jordan, Egypt, and Lebanon. He has previously held posts at The American University in Cairo and Georgetown University, and his work has been published in a number of journals including Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik, Journal of Semitic Studies, and Arabica.