Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Arguing over Texts: The Rhetoric of Interpretation

(Assistant Professor, Loyola University, Maryland)
  • Formaat: 216 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 02-Oct-2017
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press Inc
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780190677138
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 94,42 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: 216 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 02-Oct-2017
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press Inc
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780190677138
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

From the Constitution to the Bible, from literary classics to political sound bites, our modern lives are filled with numerous texts that govern and influence our behavior and beliefs. Whether in the courtrooms of our judiciaries or over our dining room tables, we argue over what these texts mean as we apply them to our lives. Various schools of hermeneutics offer theories of how we generally understand the world around us or how to read certain types of texts to arrive at the correct or best interpretation, but most neglect the argumentative and persuasive nature of every act of interpretation.
In Arguing over Texts, Martin Camper presents a rhetorical method for understanding the types of disagreement people have over the meaning of texts and the lines of argument they use to resolve those disagreements. Camper's fresh approach has its roots in the long forgotten interpretive stases, originally devised by ancient Greek and Roman teachers of rhetoric for inventing courtroom arguments concerning the meaning of legal documents such as wills, laws, and contracts. The interpretive stases identify general, recurring debates over textual meaning and catalogue the lines of reasoning arguers may employ to support their preferred interpretations. Drawing on contemporary research in language, persuasion, and cognition, Camper expands the scope of the interpretive stases to cover textual controversies in virtually any context. To illustrate the interpretive stases' wide range of applicability, Arguing over Texts contains examples of interpretive debates from law, politics, religion, history, and literary criticism.
Arguing over Texts will appeal to anyone who is interested in analyzing and constructing interpretive arguments.

Arvustused

Martin Camper has produced an excellent contribution to scholarship in rhetoric and textual interpretation. Moreover, his accessible writing and argumentation should serve as models for expanding the audience of scholarship in rhetorical studies. * Jordan Loveridge, Argumentation and Advocacy * this is a read recommended not only to the specialists in rhetoric or argumentation, but also to all those who work with texts, not just in the academic world ... [ it] will give the reader a better overview of the ideas presented in texts, their multidimensional nature, and how to argue about particular interpretations. * David E. Susa, Kult Online * Camper's new interpretative stases allow for sensitive and astute readings of these sacred texts, fulfilling his promise to provide a model of interpretative stases that effectively joins hermeneutics with rhetoric. * Advances in the History of Rhetoric * Camper's book rejuvenates the interpretive stases, a classical technique for analyzing arguments, and applies them to an intriguing range of historical cruxes, from questions about the authenticity of the Donation of Constantine to the sexual orientation of Abraham Lincoln and on into modern times. Camper explains the rhetorical theory with great sophistication, and yet so clearly that I plan to adapt some of his case studies for teaching argument at the college undergraduate level. This book makes an important contribution to our understanding of a neglected aspect of classical rhetoric. * Patricia Bizzell, Professor of English, Distinguished Professor of Humanities, College of the Holy Cross * The time is ripe for this book. Arguably, the interpretive stases underpin the whole humanistic enterprise of hermeneutics, including literary theory and reception theory. Camper draws from political, literary, and religious texts, some quite timely, some dealing with quite contentious issues (such as race and gender), and all insightfully analyzed. Students and scholars alike will find it a lively and useful book. * Davida Charney, Professor of Rhetoric and Writing, University of Texas at Austin *

Acknowledgments xi
Permissions xiii
1 The Interpretive Stases: A Theory of How People Argue over Texts
1(13)
The Origins, Development, and Fall of the Interpretive Stases
4(3)
Rhetoric and Hermeneutics
7(1)
A Rhetorical Approach to Arguments over Texts: The Six Interpretive Stases
8(6)
2 Ambiguity
14(29)
Standard Disputes over Ambiguity: When Authorial Intention Is Unclear
16(2)
The Linguistic Sources of Ambiguity
18(5)
Resolving Ambiguity through Appeals to Context
23(9)
Special Cases of Disputes over Ambiguity
32(5)
Rescuing Phillis Wheatley's Reputation with an Appeal to Intentional Ambiguity
37(2)
Ambiguity as an Opportunity for Opening and Shifting Textual Meaning
39(4)
3 Definition
43(25)
The Scope and Limits of a Term
45(3)
Persuasively Articulating a Definition
48(3)
Defending and Attacking Definitions
51(8)
Linchpin Terms: The Keys to Refraining Passages and Controversies
59(3)
McDonald v. Chicago: A Constitutional Debate over Gun Rights as Fundamental "Privileges" and "Immunities"
62(3)
The Power of Defining a Single Term
65(3)
4 Letter versus Spirit
68(23)
The Opposition between Letter and Spirit
69(3)
Expanding the Notions of Letter and Spirit
72(3)
Arguing in Favor of Letter, Arguing in Favor of Spirit
75(10)
Did Jeremiah Wright Really Mean "God Damn America"? The Debate over the Sound Bite That Almost Sank Obama
85(3)
The Author Is Not and Has Never Been Dead
88(3)
5 Conflicting Passages
91(22)
The Problem of Inconsistency in Human Communication
92(2)
Three Types of Disputes over Apparent Textual Inconsistency
94(3)
Resolving Textual Inconsistencies through Argument
97(8)
Special Cases of Textual Inconsistency
105(3)
Defending Women's Right to Preach by Constructing and Resolving Textual Inconsistencies in Frances Willard's Woman in the Pulpit
108(3)
Reinterpreting the Structures of Texts by Resolving Textual Inconsistencies
111(2)
6 Assimilation
113(26)
Assimilation as Distinct from Letter versus Spirit
115(2)
The Motivating Circumstances for Assimilation
117(2)
Reasoning in Assimilation
119(4)
Strategies for Supporting or Refuting Assimilations
123(7)
Special Features of Assimilation
130(3)
Reading between the Lines for Lincoln's (Homo) Sexuality
133(3)
The Power and Weakness of Assimilation
136(3)
7 Jurisdiction
139(24)
Preliminary Conditions for Interpreting a Text
140(2)
The Right to Interpret a Text
142(5)
The Admissibility of a Text
147(8)
Other General Lines of Argument in Jurisdiction
155(3)
The Legitimacy of the Donation of Constantine and the Pope's Power over Western Europe
158(3)
Textual Interpretation: A Socially Controlled Activity
161(2)
8 Opening, Closing, and Moving through Interpretive Disputes
163(10)
The Interrelations of the Interpretive Stases
165(3)
Initiating and Resolving Interpretive Disputes
168(5)
References 173(10)
Index 183
Martin Camper is Assistant Professor of Writing at Loyola University Maryland, where he teaches courses in rhetoric, writing, argument, and style. He researches and publishes in the history of rhetoric, rhetorical and argumentation theory, the rhetoric of religion, and college writing.