Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence of Issues in Adult-Children Discussions

(USI - Università della Svizzera italiana)
  • Formaat: 176 pages
  • Sari: Argumentation in Context 19
  • Ilmumisaeg: 06-Apr-2021
  • Kirjastus: John Benjamins Publishing Co
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9789027259936
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 98,80 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: 176 pages
  • Sari: Argumentation in Context 19
  • Ilmumisaeg: 06-Apr-2021
  • Kirjastus: John Benjamins Publishing Co
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9789027259936
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

"This book traces the issue in argumentative discussions from its emergence to its evolution. The book makes use of naturally occurred data of spoken argumentation to investigate how an issue is raised and possibly negotiated in argumentative discussionsbetween young children (aged 2 to 6 years) and adults. The author proposes a typology of the emergence of issues based on the argumentative agency of the interlocutors. Moreover, the investigation sheds light on how issues evolve through negotiation among the involved interlocutors and how issues may be related to the interlocutors' endoxa. By applying an interdisciplinary approach including Argumentation theory (the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion and the Argumentum Model of Topics) aswell as sociocultural developmental psychology this work allows for a careful consideration of the many aspects that come into play when young children start or engage in an argumentative discussions with adults"--

This book traces the issue in argumentative discussions from its emergence to its evolution. The book makes use of naturally occurred data of spoken argumentation to investigate how an issue is raised and possibly negotiated in argumentative discussions between young children (aged 2 to 6 years) and adults. The author proposes a typology of the emergence of issues based on the argumentative agency of the interlocutors. Moreover, the investigation sheds light on how issues evolve through negotiation among the involved interlocutors and how issues may be related to the interlocutors’ endoxa. By applying an interdisciplinary approach including Argumentation theory (the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion and the Argumentum Model of Topics) as well as sociocultural developmental psychology this work allows for a careful consideration of the many aspects that come into play when young children start or engage in an argumentative discussions with adults.
List of figures
ix
List of tables
xi
Abbreviations xiii
Acknowledgements xv
Young children as rational interlocutors: A perspective on family argumentation 1(8)
Sara Greco
Chapter 1 The `issue' in argumentative discussions between adults and young children
9(6)
Chapter 2 Argumentation theory
15(22)
2.1 The notion of issue in argumentation literature
15(10)
2.1.1 A historical literature review
16(7)
2.1.2 The issue in this work
23(1)
2.1.3 Studies on the issue in argumentation
24(1)
2.2 The pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation
25(5)
2.2.1 The stages of an argumentative discussion
26(1)
2.2.2 Reconstructing argumentative discussions
27(3)
2.3 The Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT)
30(4)
2.3.1 Reconstructing the relation between argument and standpoint
30(3)
2.3.2 Analyzing implicit premises with the Argumentum Model of Topics
33(1)
2.4 A communication approach to context: The model of communication context
34(3)
Chapter 3 Perspectives on children's argumentation
37(16)
3.1 Sociocultural developmental psychology
37(4)
3.1.1 The thinking space
38(1)
3.1.2 Children's argumentation from the perspective of sociocultural developmental psychology
39(2)
3.2 Can and do young children argue?
41(3)
3.3 Previous applications and developments of the pragma-dialectical model to children's discussions
44(2)
3.4 Children's argumentation in different informal contexts
46(7)
3.4.1 Family argumentation
49(4)
Chapter 4 Children's argumentation within the family
53(10)
4.1 Why it is important to define context to study argumentation and why it is difficult
53(1)
4.2 Argumentation in family: A corpus description
54(6)
4.2.1 Data processing: Transcription
57(1)
4.2.2 The family as an interaction field
58(1)
4.2.3 The common ground in a family
59(1)
4.2.4 The frame in family discussions
59(1)
4.2.5 Concluding remarks on the family as a context
59(1)
4.3 Case selection
60(3)
Chapter 5 Case studies: The issue in young children's argumentation in family
63(42)
5.1 A typology of the emergence of issues in adult-children discussions
65(34)
5.1.1 Type 1A: A child problematizes something in an adult's utterance
67(9)
5.1.2 Discussion of type 1A
76(2)
5.1.3 Type IB: A child problematizes something in an adult's utterance and opens up a sub-issue
78(9)
5.1.4 Discussion of type 1B
87(1)
5.1.5 Type 2A: An adult problematizes something in a child's utterance
88(4)
5.1.6 Discussion of type 2A
92(1)
5.1.7 Type 2B: An adult problematizes something in a child's utterance and opens up a sub-issue
92(1)
5.1.8 Type 3: A child problematizes something in a peer's utterance
93(2)
5.1.9 Discussion of type 3
95(1)
5.1.10 Type 4: A child puts forward a standpoint and an argument supporting that standpoint
95(3)
5.1.11 Discussion of type 4
98(1)
5.1.12 Type 5: An adult puts forward a standpoint and an argument supporting that standpoint
99(1)
5.2 Concluding remarks on the typology of the emergence of issues in adult-children discussions
99(6)
5.2.1 Decentration in the typology of the emergence of issues in adult-children discussions
102(3)
Chapter 6 How issues develop during the discussion: The issue negotiation
105(18)
6.1 The `chocolate bar' case
106(8)
6.2 The `straw bale' case
114(5)
6.3 Concluding remarks regarding the negotiation of the issue
119(4)
Chapter 7 The relation issue -- endoxon
123(12)
7.1 The `memory game' case
125(5)
7.2 The `teeth' case
130(3)
7.3 Concluding remarks on the relation issue -- endoxon
133(2)
Chapter 8 Conclusions
135(14)
8.1 On the emergence of argumentation in conversation
136(3)
8.2 The relation between issue and endoxon
139(2)
8.3 The interplay between the issue and the freedom rule
141(2)
8.4 Take-aways of this research
143(6)
8.4.1 Perspectives in argumentation
143(2)
8.4.2 Perspectives in psychology
145(1)
8.4.3 Perspectives in education
146(3)
References 149(10)
Index 159