Autoethnography: A Case for the Defence presents a thoughtful and compelling exploration of autoethnography as a research methodology, addressing the growing wave of academic, analytical and ethical critiques that accompany its rising prominence. Rather than simply outlining the foundations and rationale behind autoethnography, this text takes a distinctive stance by advocating for and defending the methodology in response to the evolving discourse around its validity. It provides deeper insight and practical guidance for those interested in pursuing or better understanding qualitative research methods. Grounded in robust research and interwoven with references to influential autoethnographic works, the book establishes a strong scholarly framework, reinforcing the credibility of autoethnography as a valuable methodological tool. Through engaging, accessible prose, the author confronts criticisms head-on, offering clear explanations and vivid examples that underscore autoethnography’s vital role in examining and interpreting complex and broad social phenomena. This book is designed for students, academics and researchers interested in autoethnography, qualitative inquiry and broader research methodologies.
Autoethnography: A Case for the Defence presents a thoughtful and compelling exploration of autoethnography as a research methodology, addressing the growing wave of academic, analytical, and ethical critiques that accompany its rising prominence.
1.
Chapter One: Introduction to Autoethnography
2.
Chapter Two: Cant We All Just Get Along? On the Bifurcation of Evocative
and Analytical Autoethnography
3.
Chapter Three: Self-Obsession Masquerading as Scholarship? On the Claim
that Autoethnography is Narcissistic
4.
Chapter Four: Unreliable Narrators: On the Claim that Autoethnography
Lacks Validity and Reliability
5.
Chapter Five: Its Not Rocket Science: On the Claim that Autoethnography
is not Scientific
6.
Chapter Six: This Might Get Personal: On the Claim that Autoethnography is
an Emotional, Rather than Analytical, Framework
7.
Chapter Seven: The Art of Snore: On the Claim that Autoethnography is
Uninteresting
8.
Chapter Eight: Sharing is Not Caring: On the Claim that Autoethnography is
Not Ethical
9.
Chapter Nine: Blurred Lines? On the Claim that Autoethnography Blurs the
Genres of Creative Writing and Critical Inquiry.
10.
Chapter Ten: Nuance to Nonsense: On the Claim that Autoethnography
Oversimplifies Complex Social Phenomena
11.
Chapter Eleven: Truth Hurts? On the Claim that Autoethnography Further
Entrenches Marginalisation
12.
Chapter Twelve: I Rest my Case: Conclusions in the Defence of
Autoethnography
Dane Morace-Court is a senior lecturer in Education at Southampton Solent University. Having used autoethnography as a methodological approach in his own doctoral thesis, Dr. Morace-Court brings a first-hand understanding of the challenges, ethical considerations and potential rewards of such an approach.
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta