Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Bind Me Tender, Bind Me Do!: Dative and Accusative Arguments as Antecedents for Reflexives in Polish

, Series edited by , , ,
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 47,63 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
Bind Me Tender, Bind Me Do!: Dative and Accusative Arguments as Antecedents for Reflexives in PolishSuurem pilt
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This book presents a comprehensive picture of binding relations in Polish and specifically focuses on two problem areas: (a) subject orientation of reflexives, and (b) the fact that dative experiencers locally bind both reflexive possessives and pronominal ones. The analysis rests on current minimalist mechanisms such as Agree, Valuation and Move.



One of the well-known properties of Slavic languages is that they show subject-oriented reflexives. This book presents this phenomenon in Polish in great empirical detail and provides its up-to-date syntactic analysis, couched in the minimalist model of grammar. The analysis accounts for the fact that not only nominative subjects but also experiencers, both dative-marked and some accusative-marked, function as antecedents for reflexive elements. On the basis of empirical studies, the book explains why dative experiencers bind both reflexive and pronominal possessives in identical local configurations, while nominatve subjects bind only reflexive possessives. The authors investigate both long-distance binding relations in infinitives and contexts internal to nominal phrases. Extensive references are made to binding in other languages and alternative models.

1 Introduction and key data points
11(22)
1.1 Introduction
11(1)
1.2 Key data points
11(16)
1.3 Composition of this volume
27(6)
2 A-Binding as LF-relevant Upward Agree and PF-relevant Head Movement
33(38)
2.1 Introduction
33(1)
2.2 Components of the analysis
33(36)
2.2.1 Index Raising (Nikolaeva 2014)
35(6)
2.2.2 Modifying the theoretical framework
41(1)
2.2.2.1 A-binding as Agree
41(3)
2.2.2.2 D-bound/index rising as clitic climbing
44(25)
2.3 Conclusions
69(2)
3 The system at work
71(36)
3.1 Introduction
71(1)
3.2 Sample derivations
71(10)
3.3 Index Raising as a diagnostic for case positions of datives
81(17)
3.3.1 The VP-internal dative antecedents
81(5)
3.3.2 The medial domain: Dative OEs in [ spec.vP]
86(1)
3.3.2.1 OEs with non-verbal psychological predicates
87(2)
3.3.2.2 Verbal psychological predicates and the idiosyncrasy of podobac sie appeal to'
89(6)
3.3.2.3 Dative antecedents in the high domain and more Long-Distance Binding
95(3)
3.4 Extension to the Anaphor Agreement Effect
98(8)
3.5 Concluding remarks
106(1)
4 Extensions: Accusative Object Experiencers as antecedents and binding in nominal domains
107(44)
4.1 Introduction
107(1)
4.2 The position of accusative-marked arguments and binding
107(3)
4.3 Accusative OEs in the medial domain
110(9)
4.4 Remarks on word order in constructions with type II psych predicates
119(14)
4.5 Binding within nominal domains
133(12)
4.6 Conclusions
145(1)
4.7 Appendix: Lexicalisation of the D-bound/Index and unambiguous c-command
146(5)
5 Binding by objects and dative experiencers -experimental studies
151(34)
5.1 Introduction
151(1)
5.2 Expl. Binding by objects (Gogloza et al. forthcoming-a)
151(13)
5.2.1 Literature discussion
152(5)
5.2.2 Expl: Aims and predictions
157(1)
5.2.3 Expl: Design
158(3)
5.2.4 Expl: Results and discussion
161(1)
5.2.4.1 Expla: Reflexive/personal pronoun bindees
161(1)
5.2.4.2 Exp lb: Reflexive/pronominal possessive bindees
162(2)
5.2.5 Conclusion
164(1)
5.3 Exp2: Binding by ExpDAT in podobac sie `to please' (Gogloza and Leska 2018)
164(10)
5.3.1 Literature discussion
166(2)
5.3.2 Exp2: Aims and predictions
168(1)
5.3.3 Exp2: Design
169(2)
5.3.4 Exp2: Results and discussion
171(2)
5.3.5 Conclusion
173(1)
5.4 Exp3. Binding by ExpDAT into TnN0M vs. TbnonNOM: Testing the AAE (Gogloza et al. forthcoming-b)
174(10)
5.4.1 Literature discussion
175(2)
5.4.2 Exp3: Aims and predictions
177(1)
5.4.3 Exp3: Design
178(2)
5.4.4 Exp3: Results and discussion
180(2)
5.4.5 Explb, Exp2 and Exp3: The effect of embedding
182(1)
5.4.6 Conclusion
183(1)
5.5 Concluding remarks
184(1)
6 Theoretical inspirations and reflections
185(62)
6.1 Introduction
185(1)
6.2 The classic start
185(6)
6.3 Binding as Agree
191(29)
6.4 Binding as movement
220(10)
6.5 Competition-based accounts
230(17)
7 Conclusions
247(8)
References 255(16)
Index of Authors 271(4)
Subject Index 275
Jacek Witko is Professor of Linguistics at the Adam Mickiewicz University (AMU), Pozna. He has authored over eighty publications on various aspects of Slavic morphosyntax. Paulina ska and Aleksandra Gogoza are Ph.D. students at AMU and Humboldt University, respectively, and Dominika Dziubaa-Szrejbrowska reads English grammar at AMU Faculty of Modern Languages.
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/97836318098462e.html