Preface |
|
xv | |
Chapter 1 Urban Logistics Spaces: What Models, What Uses and What Role for Public Authorities? |
|
1 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
4 | (14) |
|
1.3.1 The Urban Logistics Zone (ULZ) or freight village |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
1.3.2 The Urban Distribution Center (UDC) |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
1.3.3 Vehicle Reception Points (VRP) |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
1.3.4 Goods Reception Points (GRP) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
1.3.5 The Urban Logistics Box (ULB) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
1.3.6 Mobile Urban Logistics Spaces (mULS) |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (3) |
Chapter 2 Dynamic Management of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries |
|
23 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
2.2 Review of urban freight loading bay problems and solutions |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.3 Information system for dynamic management of urban last-mile deliveries |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
2.4 Algorithm for dynamic management of urban freight deliveries |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
2.5 Application of the model to a real case |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (5) |
Chapter 3 Stakeholders' Roles for Business Modeling in a City Logistics Ecosystem: Towards a Conceptual Model |
|
39 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
3.2.1 Business model concept |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Role-based networks and ecosystems |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.3 The CL business model framework: roles, business entities and value exchanges |
|
|
43 | (5) |
|
3.4 City logistics concepts and role assignment |
|
|
48 | (7) |
|
3.4.1 Parcel lockers installation: My PUP |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
3.4.2 Urban consolidation centers |
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
3.4.3 Business model implications |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (3) |
Chapter 4 Establishing a Robust Urban Logistics Network at FEMSA through Stochastic Multi-Echelon Location Routing |
|
59 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
59 | (3) |
|
4.2 Strategic distribution network design |
|
|
62 | (5) |
|
4.2.1 Distribution network |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
4.3.1 Scenario generation and selection |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
4.4.1 Data and parameters |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (4) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
4.5.3 Sensitivity to cost of lost sales |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (4) |
Chapter 5 An Evaluation Model of Operational and Cost Impacts of Off-Hours Deliveries in the City of Sao Paulo, Brazil |
|
79 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
|
84 | (3) |
|
|
87 | (3) |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (3) |
Chapter 6 Application of the Bi-Level Location-Routing Problem for Post-Disaster Waste Collection |
|
97 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
|
99 | (5) |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 Simulated Annealing |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
|
109 | (4) |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
6.5.2 Sensitivity analysis |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (3) |
Chapter 7 Next-Generation Commodity Flow Survey: A Pilot in Singapore |
|
117 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
7.2 Integrated commodity flow survey |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
7.3.1 Sampling related supply network entities |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 Multiple survey instruments leveraging sensing technologies |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
7.3.3 A unified web-based survey platform |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
7.4 Pilot survey implementation |
|
|
123 | (6) |
|
7.4.1 Sample design and recruitment |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
7.4.2 Shipment and vehicle tracking methods |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
7.4.3 Pilot survey experience and lessons learnt |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
7.4.4 Preliminary data analysis |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
Chapter 8 City Logistics and Clustering: Impacts of Using HDI and Taxes |
|
131 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
8.2.1 Principal component analysis |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (5) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (3) |
Chapter 9 Developing a Multi-Dimensional Poly-Parametric Typology for City Logistics |
|
143 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
9.4 Evaluation and analysis |
|
|
146 | (8) |
|
9.4.1 Inventory of all EU projects |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 Inventory of typologies |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
9.4.3 Land use typologies |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
9.4.5 Urban freight markets |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
9.4.6 Traffic flow typology |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
9.5 Validation and enhancement of the inventory |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (4) |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (5) |
Chapter 10 Multi-agent Simulation with Reinforcement Learning for Evaluating a Combination of City Logistics Policy Measures |
|
165 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
10.4 Case studies in Osaka and Motomachi |
|
|
168 | (7) |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
|
170 | (5) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (3) |
Chapter 11 Decision Support System for an Urban Distribution Center Using Agent-based Modeling: A Case Study of Yogyakarta Special Region Province, Indonesia |
|
179 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 | (3) |
|
11.2 Theoretical background |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
11.2.1 Urban distribution center |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
11.2.2 Decision support system of city logistics |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
11.3 The proposed decision support system |
|
|
184 | (7) |
|
11.3.1 Sy stem characterization |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
11.3.2 The logical architecture |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
11.3.3 Agent-based modeling (ABM) |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
11.3.4 Model verification and validation |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
11.4 Example of application: the case of Yogyakarta Special Region |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
194 | (3) |
Chapter 12 Evaluating the Relocation of an Urban Container Terminal |
|
197 | (14) |
|
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
12.2.3 Alternative scenarios |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (7) |
|
12.3.1 Directly affected vehicles |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
|
205 | (3) |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
209 | (2) |
Chapter 13 Multi-Agent Simulation Using Adaptive Dynamic Programing for Evaluating Urban Consolidation Centers |
|
211 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (2) |
|
13.2.1 Evaluation models for city logistics measures |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
13.2.2 ADP for evaluating city logistics measures |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (6) |
|
13.3.1 Freight carrier's MAS-ADP model |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
13.3.2 Freight carrier's MAS Q-learning model |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
13.3.3 Vehicle routing problem with soft time windows (VRPSSTW) |
|
|
218 | (2) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
13.5 Results and discussions |
|
|
221 | (5) |
|
13.5.1 Case 0 (base case) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (3) |
|
13.6 Conclusion and future work |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (3) |
Chapter 14 Use Patterns and Preferences for Charging Infrastructure for Battery Electric Vehicles in Commercial Fleets in the Hamburg Metropolitan Region |
|
229 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
14.2 State of the art/context of study |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
14.3 Research goal and approach |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
14.4 Method of data collection |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
14.5 Results and discussion |
|
|
232 | (5) |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
|
238 | (3) |
Chapter 15 The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Specific Freight Flows: Insights from the Netherlands |
|
241 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
244 | (2) |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
15.5 Potential of LEFV for different freight flows |
|
|
247 | (6) |
|
15.5.1 Selection of freight flows |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
15.5.2 Description of freight flows |
|
|
248 | (5) |
|
15.5.3 Receivers' perspective |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
15.6 Multi-criteria evaluation |
|
|
253 | (3) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
|
259 | (2) |
Chapter 16 Use of CNG for Urban Freight Transport: Comparisons Between France and Brazil |
|
261 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
16.2 Brief literature review |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
|
265 | (2) |
|
16.6 Comparison of Brazilian and French experience |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
|
268 | (3) |
Chapter 17 Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Evaluate City Logistics Initiatives: An Application to Freight Consolidation in Small- and Mid-Sized Urban Areas |
|
271 | (20) |
|
|
|
271 | (2) |
|
17.2 Characteristics of city logistics and some terminology |
|
|
273 | (6) |
|
17.2.1 Efficiency in city logistics |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
17.2.2 Evaluation methods |
|
|
275 | (4) |
|
17.3 Potential costs and benefits of implementing urban consolidation centers |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
17.4 Coordinated freight distribution in Linkoping |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
17.5 Evaluating urban freight initiatives by cost-benefit analysis |
|
|
281 | (5) |
|
17.6 The problem of cost allocation |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
|
287 | (4) |
Chapter 18 Assumptions of Social Cost-Benefit Analysis for Implementing Urban Freight Transport Measures |
|
291 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 | (4) |
|
18.2 The assumptions for utilization of SCBA in city logistics |
|
|
295 | (15) |
|
18.2.1 External air pollution cost |
|
|
296 | (3) |
|
18.2.2 Marginal climate change costs |
|
|
299 | (2) |
|
18.2.3 Marginal accident costs |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
|
302 | (2) |
|
18.2.5 Marginal external noise costs |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
18.2.6 Employment growth and development of local economy |
|
|
305 | (3) |
|
18.2.7 Final calculations |
|
|
308 | (2) |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
|
310 | (3) |
Chapter 19 Barriers to the Adoption of an Urban Logistics Collaboration Process: A Case Study of the Saint-Etienne Urban Consolidation Centre |
|
313 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
313 | (2) |
|
19.2 Background and theoretical framework |
|
|
315 | (5) |
|
19.2.1 The stakeholders in an urban logistics collaboration project |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
19.2.2 Urban Consolidation Centre (UCC) as an organizational innovation |
|
|
316 | (2) |
|
19.2.3 Barriers in urban logistics projects |
|
|
318 | (2) |
|
19.3 Research methodology |
|
|
320 | (2) |
|
19.3.1 The research approach |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
19.3.2 Qualitative study: selection of respondents |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
19.3.3 Quantitative analysis: purpose and CBA methodology |
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
|
322 | (6) |
|
19.4.1 The UCC of Saint-Etienne: background and objectives |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
19.4.3 The conditions of economic viability of Saint-Etienne's UCC |
|
|
324 | (2) |
|
19.4.4 Barriers identified by stakeholders |
|
|
326 | (2) |
|
|
328 | (1) |
|
|
328 | (5) |
Chapter 20 Logistics Sprawl Assessment Applied to Locational Planning: A Case Study in Palmas (Brazil) |
|
333 | (18) |
|
Lilian Dos Santos Fontes Pereira Bracarense |
|
|
|
|
Renata Lucia Magalhaes De Oliveira |
|
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
20.2 Logistics sprawl and the importance of logistics facilities' location |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
|
335 | (4) |
|
|
339 | (8) |
|
20.4.1 Logistics sprawl assessment and scenario comparison |
|
|
342 | (5) |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (3) |
Chapter 21 Are Cities' Delivery Spaces in the Right Places? Mapping Truck Load/Unload Locations |
|
351 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gabriela Giron Valderrama |
|
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
21.2 Moving more goods, more quickly |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
21.3 Establishment of a well-defined partnership |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
21.4 The Final 50 Feet project |
|
|
354 | (2) |
|
|
356 | (2) |
|
21.6 Mapping the city's freight delivery infrastructure |
|
|
358 | (8) |
|
21.6.1 Step 1: collect existent data |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
21.6.2 Step 2: develop survey to collect freight bay and loading dock data |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
21.6.3 Preliminary site visits |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
21.6.4 Initial survey form and the pilot survey |
|
|
360 | (3) |
|
21.6.5 Step 3: implement the survey |
|
|
363 | (3) |
|
|
366 | (2) |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
|
368 | (1) |
List of Authors |
|
369 | (6) |
Index |
|
375 | |