Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Classifying Science: Phenomena, Data, Theory, Method, Practice

  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 221,68 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Classification is the essential first step in science. The study of science, as well as the practice of science, will thus benefit from a detailed classification of different types of science.



In this book, science - defined broadly to include the social sciences and humanities - is first unpacked into its constituent elements: the phenomena studied, the data used, the theories employed, the methods applied, and the practices of scientists. These five elements are then classified in turn. Notably, the classifications of both theory types and methods allow the key strengths and weaknesses of different theories and methods to be readily discerned and compared. Connections across classifications are explored: should certain theories or phenomena be investigated only with certain methods? What is the proper function and form of scientific paradigms? Are certain common errors and biases in scientific practice associated with particular phenomena, data, theories, or methods? The classifications point to several ways of improving both specialized and interdisciplinary research and teaching, and especially of enhancing communication across communities of scholars. The classifications also support a superior system of document classification that would allow searches by theory and method used as well as causal links investigated.

Arvustused

From the reviews:









"Szostak proffers an organized, internally consistent, method in the context of a Generic Philosophy of Science & Methodology applicable in any phase of problem-solving. The author utilizes a unique key deductive guideline throughout the book which is grounded in one of the simplest organizing principles possible: the 5W questions Who, What, Where, When, and Why are asked. Do get a copy of this excellent book!" (Karl H. Wolf, International Journal of General Systems, Vol. 35 (4), 2006)



"The Earth sciences encompass many disciplines, including Information Science and Knowledge Management. Here is Volume seven to be cognitively cherished . Sciences definition has been much broadened, and since all disciplines use classifications, there is no limit: everyone engaged in problem solving ought to get Szostaks book: including all information technologist, librarians, basic and applied researchers, educationalists/teachers, as well as, post-graduates and motivated secondary school students. This new book will definitely open your intellectual vision. Get it!" (Karl Wolf, The Australian Geologist Newsletter, Vol. 139, 2006)

List of Tables vii
Preface ix
Chapter 1: Classifying Science 1(22)
1.1. A Simple Classificatory Guideline
3(2)
1.2. The First "Cut" (and Plan of Work)
5(4)
1.3. Some Preliminaries
9(14)
Chapter 2: Classifying Phenomena and Data 23(28)
2.1. Classifying Phenomena
23(22)
2.2. Classifying Data
45(6)
Chapter 3: Classifying Theory 51(48)
3.1. Typology of Theory
55(19)
3.2. What Is a Theory?
74(4)
3.3. Evaluating Theories
78(2)
3.4. Types of Theory and the Five Types of Causation
80(2)
3.5. Classifying Individual Theories
82(13)
3.6. Advantages of a Typology of Theory
95(4)
Chapter 4: Classifying Method 99(56)
4.1. Classifying Methods
101(2)
4.2. Typology of Strengths and Weaknesses of Methods
103(6)
4.3. Qualitative Versus Quantitative Analysis Revisited
109(4)
4.4. Evaluating Methods
113(3)
4.5. Classifying Particular Methods Within The Typology
116(28)
4.6. Advantages of a Typology of Methods
144(11)
Chapter 5: Classifying Practice 155(44)
5.1. Errors and Biases in Science
158(3)
5.2. Typology of (Critiques of) Scientific Practice
161(31)
5.3. Utilizing This Classification
192(2)
5.4. The Five Types of Ethical Analysis
194(5)
Chapter 6: Drawing Connections Across These Classifications 199(18)
6.1. Theory and Method
199(4)
6.2. Theory (Method) and Phenomena (Data)
203(5)
6.3. Better Paradigms
208(5)
6.4. Critiques of Scientific Practice: Are They Correlated with Other Classifications?
213(4)
Chapter 7: Classifying Scientific Documents 217(22)
7.1. Faceted or Enumerative?
219(2)
7.2. Classifying By Phenomena Studied
221(4)
7.3. Classifying By Theory Used
225(2)
7.4. Classifying By Method Used
227(1)
7.5. Links Among Subjects
228(1)
7.6. Type of Work, Language, and More
229(1)
7.7. Critiques of Scientific Practice
230(1)
7.8. Classifying Philosophy
231(1)
7.9. Evaluating the System
232(7)
Chapter 8: Concluding Remarks 239(30)
8.1. The Classifications
239(2)
8.2. Advantages of These Various Classifications
241(4)
8.3. Drawing Connections Across Classifications
245(2)
8.4. Golden Mean Arguments
247(2)
8.5. Why Should Science Be Believed?
249(1)
8.6. How Can Science Be Improved?
250(9)
8.7. How Should Science Be Taught?
259(10)
References 269(10)
Index 279