|
|
1 | (8) |
|
2 Theoretical and Empirical Accounts of the "Modular Mind" |
|
|
9 | (22) |
|
2.1 Historical Background of the Modular Mind |
|
|
10 | (10) |
|
2.1.1 The Modular Mind: Many Modules Linked by Interface Mechanisms |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
2.1.2 The Language Faculty |
|
|
12 | (5) |
|
2.1.3 Parallel Architecture Model |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
2.2 Overview of Linguistic Interface Research: Evidence from Child and Agrammatic Speech |
|
|
20 | (11) |
|
2.2.1 Differentiating Narrow-Syntax and Interface-Syntax |
|
|
21 | (6) |
|
2.2.2 Non-target-like Interface-Syntax in Children |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
3 Linguistic Interfaces in Bilingualism Research |
|
|
31 | (26) |
|
3.1 Interface-Syntax in the Grammar of Bilingual Children |
|
|
31 | (9) |
|
3.1.1 Overlapping Structures at the Interface-Syntax |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
3.1.2 CLI at Later Stages of Bilingual Acquisition |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
3.1.3 Language Dominance Effects on the Direction of CLI |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
3.2 Interface-Syntax in the Grammar of L1 Attriters |
|
|
40 | (5) |
|
3.3 Interface-Syntax in the Grammar of Near-Native L2 Learners |
|
|
45 | (12) |
|
3.3.1 Interface Hypothesis, Version 1: Distinguishing Narrow-Syntax and Interface-Syntax |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
3.3.2 Interface Hypothesis, Version 2: Differentiating the Internal and External Interfaces |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
3.3.3 Putting Different Strands of IH Research Together |
|
|
52 | (5) |
|
4 Review of Research on Heritage Bilingual Speakers |
|
|
57 | (18) |
|
4.1 Characteristics of Heritage Languages and Heritage Speakers |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
4.2 Approaches to Understanding the Grammar of HS |
|
|
59 | (12) |
|
4.2.1 Are Heritage Speaker Grammars Incomplete? |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
4.2.2 Is Grammar of Heritage Speakers a Different Type of Grammar? |
|
|
64 | (4) |
|
4.2.3 Is the Grammar of Heritage Speakers UG Constrained? |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
|
71 | (4) |
|
5 Measuring Animacy Effects on Verb Number Marking: A Semantics-Morphosyntax Interface Phenomenon |
|
|
75 | (40) |
|
5.1 Interaction of Animacy and Number Marking Across Languages |
|
|
76 | (6) |
|
5.1.1 Interaction of Animacy and Number Marking |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
5.1.2 Animacy Levels Across Languages |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
5.1.3 Possible Explanations for the Interaction Between Semantic Properties and Morphosyntax |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
5.2 Factors Interacting with Verb Number in Turkish |
|
|
82 | (6) |
|
5.2.1 Obligatory Non-occurrence of Verb Number Marking |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
5.2.2 Obligatory Occurrence of Verb Number Marking |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Optional Occurrence of Verb Number Marking |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
5.3 An Experimental Approach |
|
|
88 | (9) |
|
5.3.1 Measuring Gradience in Grammar |
|
|
88 | (5) |
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
5.4 Effects of Animacy on Optional Verb Number Marking: Testing Monolingual Speakers |
|
|
97 | (7) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (4) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
5.7 Effects of Animacy on Optional Verb Number Marking: Testing Bilingual Speakers |
|
|
105 | (6) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
|
107 | (4) |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
6 Measuring Effects of Topicality on Verb Number Marking: A Pragmatics-Morphosyntax Interface Phenomenon |
|
|
115 | (40) |
|
6.1 Interaction of Discourse Constraints and Verb Number Marking in Turkish |
|
|
115 | (6) |
|
6.1.1 Distinctness Motivation on Use of Overt Verb Number Marking |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
6.1.2 Pragmatic Motivation on Use of Overt Verb Number Marking |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
6.2 Information Structural Properties in Turkish |
|
|
121 | (7) |
|
6.2.1 Information Structure and the Referential Status of Subject Referents |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Function of Word Order in Turkish |
|
|
122 | (6) |
|
6.3 Interaction of Discourse Constraints and Morphosyntax Across Languages |
|
|
128 | (6) |
|
6.3.1 SR Systems Operating on Narrow-Syntax Values |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 SR Systems Operating on Discourse Values |
|
|
130 | (4) |
|
|
134 | (4) |
|
|
134 | (4) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
6.5 Effects of Topicality on Optional Verb Number Marking: Testing Monolingual Speakers |
|
|
138 | (4) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
6.8 Effects of Topicality on Optional Verb Number Marking: Testing Bilingual Speakers |
|
|
145 | (5) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
6.8.4 Comparing Monolingual and Bilingual Results |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
6.9 General Discussion and Conclusions |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
7 Supporting Evidence from Categorical Data |
|
|
155 | (8) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
157 | (4) |
|
7.2.1 Analysis of Animacy Levels |
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
7.2.2 Analysis of Givenness-Newness Levels |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
8 Putting Things into a Frame |
|
|
163 | (14) |
|
|
164 | (8) |
|
8.1.1 The Core Language System and the Conceptual Structure |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
8.1.2 Information Stores, Processors, Interfaces, and Representations |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
8.2 First and Second Language Acquisition and Maintenance in MOGUL |
|
|
172 | (5) |
|
8.2.1 Acquisition by Processing Theory |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
8.2.2 Second Language Acquisition in MOGUL |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
8.2.3 Attrition by Processing Theory |
|
|
173 | (4) |
|
9 General Discussion and Conclusions |
|
|
177 | (10) |
Appendix 1 Output Tables |
|
187 | (4) |
Appendix 2 Individual Characteristics of Monolingual and Bilingual Participants |
|
191 | (8) |
References |
|
199 | (16) |
Index |
|
215 | |