Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Debating Federalism: From the Founding to Today

  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 21-Nov-2018
  • Kirjastus: Lexington Books
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781498542883
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 53,30 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Ilmumisaeg: 21-Nov-2018
  • Kirjastus: Lexington Books
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781498542883

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Federalismthe division of authority between the states and the federal governmentranks among the most important and lasting political and constitutional contributions of the American founders. Since the founding, however, Americans have engaged in a perpetual argument over federalisms proper structure and function. Arranged thematically and covering the entire span of American history, Debating Federalism: From the Founding to Today provides readers with the sources necessary to trace and understand this perennial debate. By examining the theoretical, polemical, political arguments as well as landmark Supreme Court cases, this collection reveals the continuing relevance and contentiousness of federalism in the American constitutional order.

Arvustused

Well-selected and carefully edited. The readings in this excellent volume show how the drama of American politics has been motivated and made more pronounced by questions of sovereignty. 'Who shall rule' is a question too often given a rote, unthinking answer of 'the people,' without consideration of the important question 'which people?' Would it be the people of Virginia, or Massachusetts, or rather the people of the nation as a whole that would decide the fate of the United States? From civil rights to economic power, central questions of American identity and prosperity hinge on issues of state versus federal powerin short, on the state of our federalism. -- Bruce Frohnen, Ohio Northern University, historian and author of Virtue and the Promise of Conservatism This is a highly useful collection for all students interested in American constitutional development. The documents are well-chosen to illustrate the peculiar ways Americans have thought about and applied the principle of federalism. The volumes greatest strength is its wide historical scope combined with its more narrow thematic focus. It is strongly recommended. -- Jeffery J. Rogers, Gordon State College Debating Federalism contains a cache of important primary sources from the sixteenth through the twenty-first centuries covering two of the oldest and most contested topics in American constitutionalism: federalism and sovereignty. From political treatises and pamphlets to speeches and court decisions, the documents reveal that constitutionalism is hardly the dry, dead subject many assume it to be. Aaron N. Coleman and Christopher S. Leskiw provide a learned introduction that speaks to both the past and present relevance of federalism and sovereignty to American history and political life. This book offers an excellent entry point for students and scholars to grapple with these foundational American concepts. -- Adam Tate, Clayton State University

Acknowledgments xiii
A Note on Documents and Editing xv
Introductory Essay xvii
Part I: Sovereignty And Reserved Powers 1(196)
Jean Bodin On Sovereignty
2(2)
Leviathan
4(4)
Thomas Hobbes
Spirit of Laws
8(1)
Montesquieu
Law of Nations
8(1)
Vattel
Blackstone's Commentaries
9(2)
Declaratory Act
11(1)
Inquiry into the Rights of the British Colonies
12(1)
Richard Bland
The Rights of the Colonies Examined
12(1)
Stephen Hopkins
The Farmer Refuted
13(1)
Alexander Hamilton
Articles of Confederation
14(1)
"The Continentalist No. 1"
14(3)
Alexander Hamilton
1783 Treaty of Peace
17(1)
"Observations on the Fourth and Fifth Articles of the Preliminaries"
18(2)
Meriwether Smith
Virginia Plan
20(1)
New Jersey Plan
21(1)
"State House Speech"
22(2)
James Wilson
Federalist No. 10
24(2)
Federalist No. 26
26(1)
Federalist No. 39
26(4)
Federalist No. 44
30(1)
Brutus 1
31(4)
Brutus 6
35(3)
Samuel Adams to Richard Henry Lee, December 3, 1787
38(1)
An Old Whig II
39(3)
Virginia Ratifying Convention
42(2)
Patrick Henry
Tenth Amendment (Ratified December 15, 1791)
44(1)
Thomas Jefferson Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank
45(1)
Alexander Hamilton Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank
46(2)
Chisholm v. Georgia
48(5)
Eleventh Amendment (Ratified February 7, 1798)
53(1)
The Kentucky Resolution
53(4)
Virginia Resolution
57(2)
Report of 1800
59(5)
James Madison
McCulloch v. Maryland
64(5)
John Taylor of Caroline, New Views of the Constitution of the United States
69(4)
The Webster-Hayne Debate
73(7)
"The Fort Hill Address"
80(3)
John C. Calhoun
South Carolina, Ordinance of Nullification
83(3)
"Proclamation Regarding Nullification"
86(12)
Andrew Jackson
Internal Improvements Veto
98(1)
Andrew Jackson
Andrew Jackson Veto Message Regarding the Bank of the United States
99(3)
A Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States
102(7)
John C. Calhoun
Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States
109(2)
Joseph Story
A Brief Enquiry into the True Nature and Character of Our Federal Government
111(3)
Abel Upshur
Luther v. Borden
114(2)
Ordinances of Secession
116(7)
Message to Congress in Special Session
123(4)
Abraham Lincoln
Gettysburg Address
127(1)
Abraham Lincoln
State Suicide Resolutions
128(2)
Charles Sumner
Veto of the First Reconstruction Act
130(3)
Andrew Johnson
Texas v. White
133(2)
"The States and the Federal Government"
135(8)
Woodrow Wilson
"Vitality of the American Constitution"
143(3)
Albert Beveridge
"New Nationalism"
146(4)
Theodore Roosevelt
Democratic Party Platform 1912
150(1)
Progressive Party Platform 1912
151(1)
The Promise of American Life
152(3)
Herbert Croly
Missouri v. Holland
155(1)
First Inaugural Address
156(2)
Franklin Roosevelt
Message to the Fifth Annual Women's Conference
158(1)
Franklin D. Roosevelt
"Great Society Speech"
159(2)
Lyndon B. Johnson
"Address to the Nation on Domestic Programs"
161(3)
Richard Nixon
First Inaugural Address
164(1)
Ronald Reagan
"Remarks in Atlanta, Georgia, at the Annual Convention of the National Conference of State Legislatures"
165(2)
Ronald Reagan
New York v. US
167(4)
Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County; Montana v United States
171(1)
Printz
Executive Order 13132
172(2)
William J. Clinton
Arizona, et al., v. United States
174(6)
Tenth Amendment Resolutions
180(12)
Executive Order Enforcing Statutory Prohibitions on Federal Control of Education
192(5)
Donald J. Trump
Part II: Civil Liberties 197(46)
Barron v Baltimore
198(1)
Civil Rights Act of 1866
199(3)
Veto of the Civil Rights Act
202(7)
Andrew Johnson
14th Amendment (Ratified, 1868)
209(1)
Platform of the States Rights Democratic Party (Dixiecrats) 1948
210(1)
Southern Manifesto
211(2)
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 2
213(1)
"Remarks on Little Rock"
214(3)
Eisenhower
Cooper v. Aaron
217(3)
"Segregation Now, Segregation Forever"
220(4)
George Wallace
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
224(1)
Katzenbach v. McClung
225(3)
Griswold v. Connecticut
228(1)
Loving v. Virginia
229(1)
Roe v. Wade
230(3)
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania et al. v Casey
233(3)
Obergefell v. Hodges
236(7)
Part III: Commerce Clause 243(12)
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
244(1)
United States v. E.C. Knight Co. (1895)
245(1)
Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918)
246(1)
A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935)
247(1)
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937)
248(1)
United States v. Darby (1941)
249(1)
Wickard v. Filburn (1942)
250(1)
U.S. v. Lopez (1995)
251(1)
United States v. Morrison (2000)
252(1)
Gonzales v. Raich (2005)
253(2)
Part IV: Incorporation Cases 255(46)
Preamble to the Bill of Rights 1791
256(1)
First Amendment
256(6)
Gitlow v. People (1925)
256(2)
Near v. Minnesota (1931)
258(1)
DeJonge v. Oregon (1937)
259(1)
Everson v. Board of Education (1947)
260(1)
Edwards v. South Carolina (1963)
261(1)
Second Amendment
262(13)
Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution (1883)
262(1)
United States v. Cruikshank (1875)
263(3)
Presser v. Illinois (1886)
266(1)
Hamilton v. Regents of University of California (1934)
267(1)
United States v. Miller (1939)
268(1)
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
269(6)
Fourth Amendment
275(2)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
275(2)
Fifth Amendment
277(6)
Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co. v. Chicago (1897)
277(1)
Malloy v. Hogan (1964)
278(3)
Benton v. Maryland (1969)
281(2)
Sixth Amendment
283(8)
In re Oliver (1948)
283(1)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
284(2)
Pointer v. Texas (1965)
286(1)
Parker v. Gladden (1966)
287(1)
Klopfer v. North Carolina (1967)
287(2)
Washington v. Texas (1967)
289(2)
Seventh Amendment
291(1)
Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis (1916)
291(1)
Eighth Amendment
292(9)
Robinson v. California (1962)
292(2)
Schilb v. Kuebel (1971)
294(7)
Index 301(6)
About the Editors 307
Aaron N. Coleman is associate professor of history and chair of the History and Political Science Department at the University of the Cumberlands.

Christopher S. Leskiw is professor of political science at the University of the Cumberlands.