Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Debating Restorative Justice

  • Formaat: 210 pages
  • Sari: Debating Law
  • Ilmumisaeg: 25-Aug-2010
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781847317339
  • Formaat - EPUB+DRM
  • Hind: 31,58 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: 210 pages
  • Sari: Debating Law
  • Ilmumisaeg: 25-Aug-2010
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781847317339

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Debating Law is a new, exciting series that gives scholarly experts the opportunity to offer contrasting perspectives on significant topics of contemporary, general interest.

In this first volume of the series, Carolyn Hoyle argues that communities and the state should be more restorative in responding to harms caused by crimes, antisocial behaviour and other incivilities, She supports the exclusive use of restorative justice for many non-serious offences, and favours approaches that, by integrating restorative and retributive philosophies, take restorative practices into the `deep end' of criminal justice. While acknowledging that restorative justice appears to have much to offer in terms of criminal justice reform, Chris Cunneen offers a different account, contending that the theoretical cogency of restorative ideas is limited by their lack of a coherent analysis of social and political power. He goes on to argue that after several decades of experimentation, restorative justice has not produced significant change in the criminal justice system and that the attempt to establish it as a feasible alternative to dominant practices of criminal justice has failed. This lively and valuable debate will be of great interest to everyone interested in the criminal justice system.

Arvustused

... Debating Restorative Justice provides a clear and accessible introduction to the key debates within restorative justice. The presentation of both author's arguments in sequence is a major strength of the book. Both authors offer convincing arguments from their individual stances, which in combination makes for an interesting contribution to wider policy and practice debates...practitioners...would do well to read this book, using the debates rehearsed as a way of reflecting upon their own practice and ways of 'doing' restoriative justice. Linda Asquith Criminology and Criminal Justice Volume 12, Number 1 The juxtaposition of [ the] respective positions provides an accessible, engaging scholarly and thought-provoking read. It is almost impossible, in a review of this length, to 'do justice' to Debating Restorative Justice. Chris Cunneen's and Carolyn Hoyle's essays provide crucial critical insights and authoritatively executed scholarly analyses that serve to reflect, define and extend the core debates in equal measure. It is a remarkable achievement and their book launches the Debating Law series to excellent effect. Barry Goldson Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology Volume 44, 2011 ...this is a thought-provoking, interestingly conceived book. C. Powell, University of Southern Maine CHOICE - Current Reviews for Academic Libraries September 2011, Vol. 49, No. 1 This stimulating and thought-provoking read is the first volume in a new 'Debating Law' series. ... these essays provide a critical but accessible introduction to the current debate. The merit of this work is that it is not simply an informative outline of theories and practices. As a tool of learning, the dialectical structure is excellent. Both authors make useful references to theoreticians, practices and case studies, and Hoyle provides an extensive bibliography. A must read for the student of criminology, law and sociology, we can eagerly await the next in the series. Christine Baker JUSTICE Journal July 2011 This new and interesting series is an opportunity for expert scholars to offer contrasting perspectives on contemporary issues which will be welcomed by the thoughtful undergraduate criminologist. There are many useful references and the 'Debating Law' series will be an additional invaluable source for the inquisitive criminologist who will always be on the look-out for some answers...even though it is clear from the finely balanced arguments of both schools of thought , that the debate will continue for a long time to come! Philip Taylor www.goodreads.com November 2010

Series Editors Preface v
Acknowledgements vii
Carolyn Hoyle
Acknowledgements ix
Chris Cunneen
The Case for Restorative Justice
1(100)
Carolyn Hoyle
I Introduction
1(5)
II A Route through Definitional constraints and Imprecision
6(10)
A Introduction
6(2)
B Defining Victims and Offenders
8(3)
C Crimes and Harms
11(3)
D Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices
14(2)
III Community at the Heart of Restorative Justice
16(10)
IV A reflection on the Imbalance between Restorative Aspirations and Restorative Practices
26(14)
A Restorative Justice in the UK: All Talk and Little or No Action
26(4)
B A Criminology of Hope
30(4)
C Appeals to Communitarianism
34(6)
V Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Complementary not Contradictory
40(32)
A A Challenge to an Unhelpful Dichotomy
40(4)
B The Case for the Coexistence of Restorative and Criminal Justice
44(6)
C A Framework for the Coexistence of Restorative and Criminal Justice
50(1)
1 Engaging community in search of appropriate participants
50(7)
2 A qualified defence of coercion
57(3)
3 The aims of punishment and the boundaries of proportionality
60(9)
4 Who should facilitate restorative processes?
69(2)
5 Conclusion
71(1)
VI In Defence of Restoration in the `Deep end' of Criminal Justice
72(19)
A Domestic Violence
75(6)
B Crimes against Humanity
81(8)
C Everything has its Limits
89(2)
VII Conclusion: Restoration for Fragmented Communities
91(4)
Bibliography
95(6)
The Limitations of Restorative Justice
101(88)
Chris Cunneen
I Introduction
101(8)
II Why Restorative Justice
109(23)
A Concept of Origins
109(9)
B Explaining the Rise of Restorative Justice
118(7)
C Policy Transfer and the Globalisation of Restorative Justice
125(7)
III Creating Ideal Victims and Offenders
132(29)
A The Victim
134(4)
B Victim Trauma
138(3)
C Does Restorative Justice Offer a Better Deal for Victims?
141(5)
D The Offender
146(4)
E Structural Inequalities and the Offender/Victim Relationship
150(1)
1 Violence against women
150(5)
2 Hate Crime
155(1)
3 Social inequality
156(1)
F Victims, Offenders, Rights and Incommensurability
157(4)
IV Law, State and Community
161(22)
A The Role of Law and the State
162(5)
B Policing and Criminalisation
167(2)
C Punishment and Risk
169(5)
D The Community
174(3)
E Transitional Justice
177(6)
V Conclusion: Searching for Truth in Restorative Justice
183(6)
Index 189
Chris Cunneen is Professor of Criminology at the Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Australia. Carolyn Hoyle is Professor of Criminology and a Fellow of Green Templeton College at the University of Oxford.