| Preface |
|
11 | (2) |
| Introduction |
|
13 | (7) |
|
The Background of Research |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Goals of the Present Study |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
|
|
16 | (4) |
|
1 Meaning and Grammaticality Prediction in Generative Grammar |
|
|
20 | (23) |
|
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
Ross's Principle of Semantic Relevance |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
|
24 | (4) |
|
Chomsky (1965): The Standard Theory |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Post-Aspects: The Late 1960s |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
Chomsky's Extended Standard Theory |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Lakoff's Semantic Input Arguments |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
Lakoff's Semantic Sensitivity Arguments |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
Jackendoff's (1972) Interpretive Semantic Component |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
2 Syntactic and Semantic Causes of Ungrammaticality |
|
|
43 | (43) |
|
Some Compatible and Incompatible Rules |
|
|
45 | (17) |
|
Dative Movement and Passive |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Reflexive and Subject-to-object Raising |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Adverb Proposing and Passive |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Extraposition from NP and Relative Clause Reduction |
|
|
47 | (3) |
|
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
Fronting Root Transformations |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
Affix-hopping and Do-support |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
That Placement and Equi-NP Deletion |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
Phrase-structure Incompatibilities |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
Partial Incompatibilities |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
That Placement and Relative Clause Formation |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
Question Formation and Complex NP Shift |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
The Syntactic Oppositions Underlying Rule Incompatibility |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
Some Semantic Oppositions Underlying Rule Incompatibility |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
Distinguishing Syntactic from Semantic Oppositions |
|
|
72 | (14) |
|
3 The Referential Meaning of Definiteness |
|
|
86 | (86) |
|
Section 1 On Adequately Describing and Explaining Semantic Facts |
|
|
86 | (6) |
|
Section 2 The Inadequacies of Current Theories of the Definite Article |
|
|
92 | (14) |
|
Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
Searle (1969): Reference as a Speech Act |
|
|
96 | (3) |
|
Christopherson's Familiarity Theory |
|
|
99 | (4) |
|
Summary of the Appropriateness Problem |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
Section 3 Some Major Usage Types of the Definite Article |
|
|
106 | (24) |
|
Anaphoric and Immediate Situation Uses |
|
|
107 | (8) |
|
|
|
115 | (8) |
|
Associative Anaphoric Uses |
|
|
123 | (7) |
|
Section 4 The `Unfamiliar' Uses of the Definite Article in Noun Phrases with Explanatory Modifiers |
|
|
130 | (19) |
|
Establishing Relative Clauses |
|
|
131 | (7) |
|
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
|
|
140 | (6) |
|
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
`Unexplanatory' Modifiers |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Section 5 Some Differences between the Definite Article and Demonstratives |
|
|
149 | (8) |
|
Section 6 The 1 Delusiveness of Definite Reference |
|
|
157 | (10) |
|
Section 7 Summary of the Speech Acts and Appropriateness Conditions of Definite Reference According to the Location Theory |
|
|
167 | (5) |
|
4 The Semantic Contrast between Definiteness and Indefiniteness |
|
|
172 | (56) |
|
Some Appropriate Usage Possibilities for Indefinites |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
The Exclusiveness of Indefinite Reference |
|
|
175 | (11) |
|
The Speech Acts and Appropriateness Conditions of Indefinite Reference |
|
|
186 | (5) |
|
On a Non-alternative to Exclusiveness |
|
|
191 | (6) |
|
Non-located Specific Indefinites |
|
|
197 | (4) |
|
Explaining the Logical Contrast between Definiteness and Indefiniteness |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
Specific and Non-specific Indefinites |
|
|
203 | (5) |
|
Non-specificness and Exclusiveness |
|
|
208 | (6) |
|
Definite and Indefinite Generics |
|
|
214 | (7) |
|
Have, Be and Set-existential Verbs |
|
|
221 | (3) |
|
Relative Clauses and Exclusiveness |
|
|
224 | (4) |
|
5 Ungrammaticalities Arising from the Semantic Contrast between Definiteness and Indefiniteness |
|
|
228 | (52) |
|
|
|
229 | (4) |
|
|
|
233 | (3) |
|
On the Non-syntactic Nature of these Article + Modifier Co-occurrence Restrictions |
|
|
236 | (4) |
|
Comparatives: The Bigger Dog of the Two |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
|
|
241 | (4) |
|
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
Sameness, Similarity and Identity |
|
|
247 | (6) |
|
The Aforementioned Reference |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
Comparatives: The Bigger Dog than NP |
|
|
255 | (8) |
|
Establishing Relatives with Indefinite NPs |
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
The Syntactic-Semantic Unity of Definites, Stressed Indefinites, Generics and Indefinites with Establishing Relatives |
|
|
265 | (2) |
|
|
|
267 | (4) |
|
NP-Complements and Noun Modifiers |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
Article + Modifier Ungrammaticalities in Generative Grammar |
|
|
272 | (4) |
|
|
|
276 | (4) |
|
6 Conclusions and Hypotheses for the Theory of Grammar |
|
|
280 | (24) |
|
Restrictive and Appositive Relative Clauses |
|
|
282 | (7) |
|
The Extent of the Role of Semantics in Grammaticality Prediction |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
Some Grammatical Contradictions |
|
|
292 | (6) |
|
Chomsky's Selectional Restrictions |
|
|
298 | (2) |
|
|
|
300 | (4) |
| Notes |
|
304 | (3) |
| References |
|
307 | (5) |
| Index |
|
312 | |
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta