List of Figures |
|
xv | |
List of Tables |
|
xvii | |
Preface to the Third Edition |
|
xxv | |
1 Introduction |
|
1 | (10) |
|
1.1 What is a cross-over trial? |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 With which sort of cross-over trial are we concerned? |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.3 Why do cross-over trials need special consideration? |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
1.5 Notation, models and analysis |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.7 Structure of the book |
|
|
10 | (1) |
2 The 2 x 2 cross-over trial |
|
11 | (94) |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
|
14 | (4) |
|
2.3 Analysis using t-tests |
|
|
18 | (9) |
|
2.4 Sample size calculations |
|
|
27 | (5) |
|
|
32 | (5) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
2.7 Consequences of preliminary testing |
|
|
39 | (5) |
|
2.8 Analyzing the residuals |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
2.9 A Bayesian analysis of the 2 x 2 trial |
|
|
46 | (8) |
|
2.9.1 Bayes using approximations |
|
|
46 | (5) |
|
2.9.2 Bayes using Gibbs sampling |
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
2.10 Use of baseline measurements |
|
|
54 | (8) |
|
|
62 | (6) |
|
2.12 Nonparametric analysis |
|
|
68 | (28) |
|
|
70 | (4) |
|
2.12.2 Testing τ1 = τ2, given that λ1 = λ2 |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
2.12.3 Testing π1 = π2, given that λ1 = λ2 |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
2.12.4 Obtaining the exact version of the Wilcoxon ranksum test using tables |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
2.12.5 Point estimate and confidence interval for δ = τ1 - τ2 |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
2.12.6 A more general approach to nonparametric testing |
|
|
78 | (5) |
|
2.12.7 Nonparametric analysis of ordinal data |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
2.12.8 Analysis of a multicenter trial |
|
|
85 | (4) |
|
2.12.9 Tests based on nonparametric measures of association |
|
|
89 | (7) |
|
|
96 | (9) |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
2.13.3 The Mainland—Gail test |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
2.13.4 Fisher's exact version of the Mainland—Gait test |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
|
102 | (3) |
3 Higher-order designs for two treatments |
|
105 | (30) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
3.3 Balaam's design for two treatments |
|
|
107 | (3) |
|
3.4 Effect of preliminary testing in Balaam's design |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
3.5 Three-period designs with two sequences |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
3.6 Three-period designs with four sequences |
|
|
117 | (4) |
|
3.7 A three-period six-sequence design |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
3.8 Which three-period design to use? |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
3.9 Four-period designs with two sequences |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
3.10 Four-period designs with four sequences |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
3.11 Four-period designs with six sequences |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
3.12 Which four-period design to use? |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
3.13 Which two-treatment design to use? |
|
|
130 | (5) |
4 Designing cross-over trials |
|
135 | (52) |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
4.2 Variance-balanced designs |
|
|
137 | (21) |
|
|
138 | (9) |
|
|
147 | (5) |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
4.2.4 Designs with many periods |
|
|
154 | (33) |
|
4.2.4.1 Quenouille, Berenblut and Patterson designs |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
4.2.4.2 Federer and Atkinson's designs |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
4.3 Optimality results for cross-over designs |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
4.4 Which variance-balanced design to use? |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
4.5 Partially balanced designs |
|
|
163 | (6) |
|
4.6 Comparing test treatments to a control |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
4.7 Factorial treatment combinations |
|
|
170 | (5) |
|
4.8 Extending the simple model for carry-over effects |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
4.9 Computer search algorithms |
|
|
177 | (10) |
5 Analysis of continuous data |
|
187 | (94) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
5.1.1 Example 5.1: INNOVO trial: dose—response study |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
5.2 Fixed subject effects model |
|
|
188 | (5) |
|
5.2.1 Ignoring the baseline measurements |
|
|
188 | (4) |
|
5.2.2 Adjusting for carry-over effects |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
5.3 Random subject effects model |
|
|
193 | (11) |
|
5.3.1 Random subject effects |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Recovery of between-subject information |
|
|
195 | (4) |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
5.3.3 Small sample inference with random effects |
|
|
199 | (3) |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
5.4 Use of baseline measurements |
|
|
204 | (18) |
|
5.4.1 Introduction and examples |
|
|
204 | (3) |
|
5.4.2 Notation and basic results |
|
|
207 | (4) |
|
5.4.3 Pre-randomization covariates |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
5.4.4 Period-dependent baseline covariates |
|
|
212 | (8) |
|
5.4.4.1 What we mean by a baseline |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
5.4.4.2 Change from baseline |
|
|
212 | (4) |
|
5.4.4.3 Baselines as covariates |
|
|
216 | (4) |
|
5.4.5 Baselines as response variables |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
5.5 Analyses for higher-order two-treatment designs |
|
|
222 | (9) |
|
5.5.1 Analysis for Balaam's design |
|
|
222 | (10) |
|
5.5.1.1 Example 5.5: Amantadine in Parkinsonism |
|
|
222 | (9) |
|
5.6 General linear mixed model |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
5.7 Analysis of repeated measurements within periods |
|
|
232 | (11) |
|
5.7.1 Example 5.7: Insulin mixtures |
|
|
233 | (10) |
|
5.7.1.1 Example 5.6 continued |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
5.8 Cross-over data as repeated measurements |
|
|
243 | (20) |
|
5.8.1 Allowing more general covariance structures |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
5.8.2 Robust analyses for two-treatment designs |
|
|
245 | (8) |
|
5.8.2.1 Single dual pair designs |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
5.8.2.2 Multiple dual pair designs |
|
|
247 | (6) |
|
5.8.3 Higher-order designs |
|
|
253 | (10) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
5.8.3.2 Using an unstructured covariance matrix |
|
|
254 | (3) |
|
5.8.3.3 Estimating equations and the empirical/sandwich estimate of error |
|
|
257 | (3) |
|
5.8.3.4 Box and modified Box procedures |
|
|
260 | (3) |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
5.9 Case study: an analysis of a trial with many periods |
|
|
263 | (18) |
|
5.9.1 Example 5.9: McNulty's experiment |
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
5.9.3 Fixed effects analysis |
|
|
266 | (7) |
|
5.9.4 Random subject effects and covariance structure |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
5.9.5 Modeling the period effects |
|
|
274 | (7) |
6 Analysis of discrete data |
|
281 | (38) |
|
|
281 | (4) |
|
6.1.1 Modeling dependent categorical data |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
|
282 | (3) |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
6.1.2.3 Subject-specific models |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
6.2 Binary data: subject effect models |
|
|
285 | (17) |
|
6.2.1 Dealing with the subject effects |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Conditional likelihood |
|
|
286 | (16) |
|
6.2.2.1 Mainland—Gart test |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
6.2.2.2 Mainland—Gart test in a logistic regression framework |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
6.2.2.3 Small sample issues |
|
|
288 | (2) |
|
6.2.2.4 Conditional logistic regression |
|
|
290 | (3) |
|
6.2.2.5 Random subject effects |
|
|
293 | (7) |
|
6.2.2.6 Higher-order designs |
|
|
300 | (2) |
|
6.3 Binary data: marginal models |
|
|
302 | (5) |
|
|
302 | (5) |
|
|
307 | (8) |
|
6.4.1 Example 6.2: Trial on patients with primary dysmenorrhea |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 Types of model for categorical outcomes |
|
|
307 | (2) |
|
6.4.3 Subject effects models |
|
|
309 | (2) |
|
6.4.3.1 Proportional odds model |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
6.4.3.2 Generalized logit model |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
|
311 | (4) |
|
6.4.4.1 Proportional odds model |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
6.4.4.2 Partial proportional odds model |
|
|
312 | (3) |
|
|
315 | (4) |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
6.5.3 Issues associated with scale |
|
|
317 | (2) |
7 Bioequivalence trials |
|
319 | (12) |
|
7.1 What is bioequivalence? |
|
|
319 | (2) |
|
7.2 Testing for average bioequivalence |
|
|
321 | (10) |
8 Case study: Phase I dose—response noninferiority trial |
|
331 | (12) |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
8.2 Model for dose response |
|
|
332 | (4) |
|
8.3 Testing for noninferiority |
|
|
336 | (1) |
|
8.4 Choosing doses for the fifth period |
|
|
336 | (3) |
|
8.5 Analysis of the design post-interim |
|
|
339 | (4) |
9 Case study: Choosing a dose—response model |
|
343 | (8) |
|
|
343 | (1) |
|
|
344 | (2) |
|
9.3 Dose—response modeling |
|
|
346 | (5) |
10 Case study: Conditional power |
|
351 | (6) |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
10.2 Variance spending approach |
|
|
351 | (2) |
|
10.3 Interim analysis of sleep trial |
|
|
353 | (4) |
11 Case study: Proof of concept trial with sample size re-estimation |
|
357 | (8) |
|
|
357 | (1) |
|
11.2 Calculating the sample size |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
|
359 | (3) |
|
|
362 | (3) |
12 Case study: Blinded sample size re-estimation in a bioequivalence study |
|
365 | (6) |
|
|
365 | (1) |
|
12.2 Blinded sample size re-estimation (BSSR) |
|
|
365 | (3) |
|
|
368 | (3) |
13 Case study: Unblinded sample size re-estimation in a bioequivalence study that has a group sequential design |
|
371 | (6) |
|
|
371 | (1) |
|
13.2 Sample size re-estimation in a group sequential design |
|
|
372 | (3) |
|
13.3 Modification of sample size re-estimation in a group sequential design |
|
|
375 | (2) |
14 Case study: Various methods for an unblinded sample size re-estimation in a bioequivalence study |
|
377 | (4) |
|
|
377 | (2) |
|
|
377 | (2) |
|
|
379 | (2) |
Appendix A Least squares estimation |
|
381 | (4) |
|
|
381 | (2) |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
|
383 | (2) |
Bibliography |
|
385 | (20) |
Index |
|
405 | |