Preface |
|
xi | |
About the Authors |
|
xv | |
|
I Prognostic models for survival data using (clinical) information available at baseline, based on the Cox model |
|
|
1 | (70) |
|
1 The special nature of survival data |
|
|
3 | (12) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.2 Basic statistical concepts |
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
1.3 Predictive use of the survival function |
|
|
9 | (4) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
|
15 | (20) |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
2.2 The proportional hazards model |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
2.3 Fitting the Cox model |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
2.4 Example: Breast Cancer II |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
2.5 Extensions of the data structure |
|
|
26 | (4) |
|
|
30 | (3) |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
3 Measuring the predictive value of a Cox model |
|
|
35 | (22) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
3.2 Visualizing the relation between predictor and survival |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
3.3 Measuring the discriminative ability |
|
|
38 | (4) |
|
3.4 Measuring the prediction error |
|
|
42 | (7) |
|
3.5 Dealing with overfitting |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
3.6 Cross-validated partial likelihood |
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
4 Calibration and revision of Cox models |
|
|
57 | (14) |
|
4.1 Validation by calibration |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (7) |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
II Prognostic models for survival data using (clinical) information available at baseline, when the proportional hazards assumption of the Cox model is violated |
|
|
71 | (48) |
|
5 Mechanisms explaining violation of the Cox model |
|
|
73 | (12) |
|
5.1 The Cox model is just a model |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (5) |
|
5.3 Measurement error in covariates |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
5.4 Cause specific hazards and competing risks |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
6 Non-proportional hazards models |
|
|
85 | (16) |
|
6.1 Cox model with time-varying coefficients |
|
|
85 | (6) |
|
6.2 Models inspired by the frailty concept |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
6.3 Enforcing parsimony through reduced rank models |
|
|
94 | (4) |
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
7 Dealing with non-proportional hazards |
|
|
101 | (18) |
|
7.1 Robustness of the Cox model |
|
|
101 | (4) |
|
7.2 Obtaining dynamic predictions by landmarking |
|
|
105 | (11) |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
III Dynamic prognostic models for survival data using time-dependent information |
|
|
119 | (50) |
|
8 Dynamic predictions using biomarkers |
|
|
121 | (14) |
|
8.1 Prediction in a dynamic setting |
|
|
121 | (3) |
|
8.2 Landmark prediction model |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
|
126 | (6) |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
9 Dynamic prediction in multi-state models |
|
|
135 | (18) |
|
9.1 Multi-state models in clinical applications |
|
|
135 | (4) |
|
9.2 Dynamic prediction in multi-state models |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
|
142 | (9) |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
10 Dynamic prediction in chronic disease |
|
|
153 | (16) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
10.2 Exploration of the EORTC breast cancer data set |
|
|
154 | (7) |
|
10.3 Dynamic prediction models for breast cancer |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
10.4 Dynamic assessment of "cure" |
|
|
164 | (4) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
IV Dynamic prognostic models for survival data using genomic data |
|
|
169 | (24) |
|
|
171 | (14) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
11.3 Application to Data Set 3 |
|
|
174 | (5) |
|
11.4 Adding clinical predictors |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
|
181 | (4) |
|
12 Dynamic prediction based on genomic data |
|
|
185 | (8) |
|
12.1 Testing the proportional hazards assumption |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
12.2 Landmark predictions |
|
|
186 | (5) |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
|
193 | (24) |
|
|
195 | (16) |
|
A.1 Data Set 1: Advanced ovarian cancer |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
A.2 Data Set 2: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
A.3 Data Set 3: Breast Cancer I (NKI) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
A.4 Data Set 4: Gastric Cancer |
|
|
200 | (3) |
|
A.5 Data Set 5: Breast Cancer II (EORTC) |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
A.6 Data Set 6: Acute Lymphatic Leukemia (ALL) |
|
|
205 | (6) |
|
|
211 | (6) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
References |
|
217 | (16) |
Index |
|
233 | |