| Preface |
|
xiii | |
| Acknowledgments |
|
xv | |
| About the Editors |
|
xvii | |
|
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercury Emissions and Deposition |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Mercury Concentration Trends in Fish |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
|
|
7 | (6) |
|
Establishing Baseline Conditions and Temporal Trends |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Establishing Cause-Effect Relationships |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Monitoring Data and Modeling |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
|
|
13 | (34) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
|
14 | (8) |
|
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Overall Criteria for Selecting Monitoring Sites, Global and Regional Influence |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
|
|
22 | (13) |
|
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
The Chemistry of Atmospheric Mercury |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Dry Deposition to Terrestrial and Aquatic Receptors |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Wet Scavenging by Precipitation Events |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Atmospheric Residence Time |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Measurements and Analytical Methods |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Modeling and the Need for Co-location/Intensive Sites |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Existing Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring Networks |
|
|
27 | (5) |
|
Air Quality Mercury Intensive Sites |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Total Ecosystem Deposition |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
|
35 | (12) |
|
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
Intensive Watershed Monitoring |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
|
41 | (6) |
|
Monitoring and Evaluating Trends in Sediment and Water Indicators |
|
|
47 | (40) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Sediment and Water Indicators |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
Criteria for Selecting Sediment and Water Indicators |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
|
|
52 | (26) |
|
Sediment-Based Indicators |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Total Hg Concentration in Sediment |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
MeHg Concentration in Sediment |
|
|
57 | (6) |
|
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Instantaneous Methylation Rate |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
Sediment Hg Accumulation Rates in Dated Cores |
|
|
65 | (4) |
|
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
|
70 | (5) |
|
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Anticipated Response Times |
|
|
81 | (6) |
|
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
|
82 | (5) |
|
Monitoring and Evaluating Trends in Methylmercury Accumulation in Aquatic Biota |
|
|
87 | (36) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Aquatic Biological Indicators |
|
|
90 | (14) |
|
Criteria to Select Indicators |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Candidate Aquatic Biological Indicators |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Recommended Aquatic Biological Indicators |
|
|
100 | (4) |
|
Monitoring and Trend Analysis |
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Interpretation of Trend-Monitoring Data |
|
|
108 | (15) |
|
Sources of Variation and Potential Confounding Factors |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
Steps to Constrain Confounding Factors and Enhance Interpretation |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
|
113 | (10) |
|
|
|
123 | (68) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
|
|
127 | (4) |
|
Geographical and Habitat Differences |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Candidate Bioindicator Species |
|
|
134 | (13) |
|
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
River Otter (Lontra canadensis) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Common Loon (Gavia immer) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Common Merganser (Mergus merganser) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
|
143 | (3) |
|
Other Potential Indicators |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
Identification of Indicators through Development of Water Quality Criteria for Wildlife |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Physiological, Cellular, and Molecular Biomarkers |
|
|
151 | (7) |
|
What Is in the Pipeline? Future and Promising Biomarkers |
|
|
152 | (6) |
|
Elements of a Biomonitoring Framework |
|
|
158 | (33) |
|
Monitoring Design Considerations |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
Trend Detection: The Florida Everglades Case Study |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Recommended Wildlife Indicators |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
|
|
166 | (25) |
|
An Integrated Framework for Ecological Mercury Assessments |
|
|
191 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
|
192 | (13) |
|
Design of the Monitoring Network |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
Criteria for Selection of Indicators |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
Considerations for Sampling |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Overall Duration of Sampling |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Monitoring for Trends and Monitoring for Causality |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Integration of Monitoring with Modeling Capabilities |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
Complexities/Confounding Factors |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
|
205 | (4) |
|
|
|
206 | (3) |
| Index |
|
209 | |