Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: EU Anti-Corruption Report: A Reflexive Governance Approach

  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Sari: Law, Crime and Culture
  • Ilmumisaeg: 16-Oct-2019
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781351369664
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 58,49 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
EU Anti-Corruption Report: A Reflexive Governance ApproachSuurem pilt
  • Formaat: PDF+DRM
  • Sari: Law, Crime and Culture
  • Ilmumisaeg: 16-Oct-2019
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781351369664
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

"This book analyses the development of anti-corruption as a policy field in the European Union with a particular focus on the EU Anti-Corruption Report. It reconstructs the origins of anti-corruption policy in the 1990s when the EU started to recognise corruption as a serious crime with a cross-border dimension. It also analyses the processes surrounding the downfall of the Santer Commission on charges of corruption in 1999 and the enlargement of the EU. This incorporation of transitional new Member States was accompanied by a number of specific measures, instruments and monitoring mechanisms to combat corruption at the supranational level, finally leading to the introduction of the EU-wide Anti-Corruption Report in 2014. The book presents an in-depth analysis of its implementation, abandonment and the way forward under the European Semester as the new instrument for achieving EU anti-corruption reforms. It offers a new interpretation of the Report as a form of reflexive governance that operates at multiple levels and involves not only the European institutions and national governments, but also the role of civil society actors in the process of developing anti-corruption policy. It applies the theory of reflexive governance in analysing the impact of the Report in the UK, Romania and Albania, including the involvement of non-state actors in anti-corruption policy making in these countries. The book concludes with a discussion on how future EU Anti-Corruption policy can make use of reflexive governance and offers recommendations to enhance anti-corruption policies of the EU, the Member States and Candidate States"--

This book analyses the development of anti-corruption as a policy field in the European Union with a particular focus on the EU Anti-Corruption Report.



This book analyses the development of anti-corruption as a policy field in the European Union with a particular focus on the EU Anti-Corruption Report. It reconstructs the origins of anti-corruption policy in the 1990s when the EU started to recognise corruption as a serious crime with a cross-border dimension. It also analyses the processes surrounding the downfall of the Santer Commission on charges of corruption in 1999 and the enlargement of the EU. This incorporation of transitional new Member States was accompanied by a number of specific measures, instruments and monitoring mechanisms to combat corruption at the supranational level, finally leading to the introduction of the EU-wide Anti-Corruption Report in 2014. The book presents an in-depth analysis of its implementation, abandonment and the way forward under the European Semester as the new instrument for achieving EU anti-corruption reforms. It offers a new interpretation of the Report as a form of reflexive governance that operates at multiple levels and involves not only the European institutions and national governments, but also the role of civil society actors in the process of developing anti-corruption policy. It applies the theory of reflexive governance in analysing the impact of the Report in the UK, Romania and Albania, including the involvement of non-state actors in anti-corruption policy making in these countries. The book concludes with a discussion on how future EU Anti-Corruption policy can make use of reflexive governance and offers recommendations to enhance anti-corruption policies of the EU, the Member States and Candidate States.

Acknowledgements ix
List of abbreviations
xi
Introduction 1(8)
SECTION 1
9(74)
1 An introduction: A short history of anti-corruption policy in the EU
11(20)
1.1 The first phase
12(4)
1.2 The second phase
16(3)
1.3 The third phase
19(3)
1.4 The fourth phase
22(7)
1.5 Conclusion
29(2)
2 The EU anti-corruption report
31(29)
2.1 Overview of general objectives and findings of the EU anti-corruption report
32(2)
2.2 Perceptions of corruption and experience of corruption in the EU
34(4)
2.2.1 Private citizen responses
34(3)
2.2.2 Commercial responses
37(1)
2.3 Public procurement
38(4)
2.4 The EU anti-corruption report recommendations for each of the member states
42(15)
2.4.1 Austria
42(1)
2.4.2 Belgium
42(1)
2.4.3 Bulgaria
43(1)
2.4.4 Croatia
43(1)
2.4.5 Cyprus
44(1)
2.4.6 Czech Republic
44(1)
2.4.7 Denmark
45(1)
2.4.8 Estonia
45(1)
2.4.9 Finland
46(1)
2.4.10 France
46(1)
2.4.11 Germany
47(1)
2.4.12 Greece
47(1)
2.4.13 Hungary
48(1)
2.4.14 Ireland
48(1)
2.4.15 Italy
49(1)
2.4.16 Latvia
49(1)
2.4.17 Lithuania
50(1)
2.4.18 Luxembourg
51(1)
2.4.19 Malta
51(1)
2.4.20 The Netherlands
52(1)
2.4.21 Poland
52(1)
2.4.22 Portugal
53(1)
2.4.23 Romania
53(1)
2.4.24 Slovakia
54(1)
2.4.25 Slovenia
55(1)
2.4.26 Spain
55(1)
2.4.27 Sweden
56(1)
2.4.28 United Kingdom
56(1)
2.5 General limitations of the EU anti-corruption report
57(2)
2.6 Conclusion
59(1)
3 The EU anti-corruption report and reflexive governance
60(23)
3.1 Introduction
60(1)
3.2 New governance in the European Union
60(2)
3.3 The open method of coordination
62(4)
3.4 Reflexive governance
66(5)
3.5 Reflexive law
71(3)
3.6 An analysis of the E U anti-corruption report as reflexive governance
74(7)
3.7 Conclusion
81(2)
SECTION 2 Country Case Studies
83(96)
4 The United Kingdom
85(29)
4.1 The EU anti-corruption report for the UK
85(2)
4.1.1 The UK attitude to ethics
86(1)
4.2 Foreign bribery in the UK
87(11)
4.2.1 Risk-based principles for preventing bribery
89(2)
4.2.2 Bribery of foreign public officials
91(3)
4.2.3 Improving the accountability in the governance of banks
94(2)
4.2.4 A review of the failures of the financial system
96(2)
4.3 Political corruption in the UK
98(10)
4.3.1 Implementing a donation cap in the UK
101(1)
4.3.2 Integrity in elected officials
102(2)
4.3.3 Corruption concerns in the defence sector
104(4)
4.4 UK responses to the EU anti-corruption report
108(2)
4.5 Post-Brexit: the UK anti-corruption initiatives
110(4)
5 Romania
114(32)
5.7 The EU anti-corruption report for Romania
114(6)
5.1.1 The judicial system
114(2)
5.1.2 The political system
116(1)
5.1.3 Healthcare
117(1)
5.1.4 Public procurement
118(2)
5.2 The EU anti-corruption strategy towards Romania---the CVM
120(19)
5.2.1 The Cooperation and Verification Mechanism for Romania
122(4)
5.2.2 Recommendations for Romania's judicial system
126(2)
5.2.3 Recommendations for the political system
128(4)
5.2.4 Recommendations for public procurement
132(4)
5.2.5 The threat of corruption in healthcare
136(3)
5.3 Post-EU anti-corruption report
139(7)
6 Albania
146(33)
6.1 The EU anti-corruption report for Albania
146(1)
6.2 Post-communist Albania and anti-corruption
146(11)
6.2.1 1990-1997: corruption as a new political chess game
146(6)
6.2.2 The collapse of the pyramid schemes and the international support to fight corruption in Albania, 1997-2009
152(4)
6.2.3 The EU conditionality and Albania's obstacles in developing an anti-corruption policy
156(1)
6.3 Albanian relations with the European Union
157(6)
6.3.1 The chronological path to accession
158(3)
6.3.2 Candidate status delay---corruption and organised crime factors
161(2)
6.4 Reforming the public administration
163(5)
6.5 Reforming the judiciary
168(4)
6.6 The future for Albania and the anti-corruption policy field
172(7)
6.6.1 Concluding remarks on the country studies
173(6)
SECTION 3
179(45)
7 The future of EU anti-corruption policy
181(43)
7.1 Introduction
181(1)
7.2 The impact of the EU anti-corruption report
181(5)
7.3 The EUanti-corruption policy---the end of the report in 2017
186(3)
7.4 The European semester process
189(13)
7.4.1 European Semester 2018 anti-corruption recommendations
192(10)
7.4.2 Country-specific recommendation summary
202(1)
7.5 EU anti-corruption policy under the European semester process
202(4)
7.5.1 European semester process: narrow scope and opaque reasoning
203(1)
7.5.2 Failures to promote good governance and the rule of law
203(2)
7.5.3 No room for a broader dialogue: civil society exclusion
205(1)
7.6 Improving the European semester process in analysing corruption
206(5)
7.6.1 Implementation
206(3)
7.6.2 Risk assessment analysis
209(2)
7.7 The future for the European semester process and EU anti-corruption policy
211(10)
7.7.1 Including organised crime in EU anti-corruption policy objectives
213(2)
7.7.2 Including the protection of whistle-blowers to EU anti-corruption policy objectives
215(2)
7.7.3 Empowering specialised anti-corruption institutions at the member state level
217(4)
7.8 Conclusion
221(3)
Conclusion
224(11)
Appendix A European semester country-specific recommendations in 2018
233(2)
Bibliography 235(26)
Index 261
Dr Andi Hoxhaj is a Teaching Fellow in Law at the University of Warwick, teaching EU law. He was awarded his doctorial title in 2017 at the University of Warwick. His work on corruption, good governance, EU enlargement policy, and the migration of young people in the Western Balkans were referred to in three parliamentary inquiry reports published by the United Kingdom Parliament in 2018. In 2018, Dr Hoxhaj was awarded the British Academy Rising Star Engagement Award. Dr Hoxhaj also holds an LLM in International Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation from the University of Warwick, and LLB (Hons) in Law from London Metropolitan University
Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta Lisainfo e-raamatute kohta
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/97813513696642e.html
Märksõnad: