Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Evaluation of the Achievement Levels for Mathematics and Reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress

  • Formaat: 288 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 12-Apr-2017
  • Kirjastus: National Academies Press
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309438186
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 4,08 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: 288 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 12-Apr-2017
  • Kirjastus: National Academies Press
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309438186
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Since 1969, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has been providing policymakers, educators, and the public with reports on academic performance and progress of the nation's students. The assessment is given periodically in a variety of subjects: mathematics, reading, writing, science, the arts, civics, economics, geography, U.S. history, and technology and engineering literacy. NAEP is given to representative samples of students across the U.S. to assess the educational progress of the nation as a whole.



Since 1992, NAEP results have been reported in relation to three achievement levels: basic, proficient, and advanced. However, the use of achievement levels has provoked controversy and disagreement, and evaluators have identified numerous concerns. This publication evaluates the NAEP student achievement levels in reading and mathematics in grades 4, 8, and 12 to determine whether the achievement levels are reasonable, reliable, valid, and informative to the public, and recommends ways that the setting and use of achievement levels can be improved.

Table of Contents



Front Matter Summary 1 Introduction 2 Setting Achievement Levels: History 3 Setting Achievement Levels: NAEP's Process 4 Reliability of the Achievement Levels 5 Validity of the Achievement Levels 6 Interpretations and Uses of NAEP Achievement Levels 7 Setting New Standards: Considerations 8 Conclusions and Recommendations References Appendix A: Agenda for Public Forum Appendix B: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff
Summary 1(14)
1 Introduction
15(20)
Background
15(3)
Standard Setting
18(3)
Key Features of NAEP
21(3)
Committee Approach
24(5)
Annex: Example of Achievement-Level Reporting for NAEP
29(6)
2 Setting Achievement Levels: History
35(22)
Background
35(1)
Evolution of NAEP Achievement Levels
36(5)
Evolution of Standard Setting
41(2)
Evaluations of NAEP's Standard Settings
43(3)
Setting Cut Scores
46(2)
Evolution of Achievement-Level Descriptors
48(6)
Summary
54(3)
3 Setting Achievement Levels: Naep's Process
57(22)
Method Selection
58(1)
Panelist Selection
59(4)
Achievement-Level Descriptors
63(4)
Method Implementation
67(10)
Conclusions
77(2)
4 Reliability Of The Achievement Levels
79(22)
Sources of Evidence
80(2)
Reliability
82(2)
Interpanelist Consistency
84(3)
Intrapanelist Consistency
87(10)
Consistency Across Replications
97(2)
Conclusions
99(2)
5 Validity Of The Achievement Levels
101(88)
Concepts of Validity and Validation
101(3)
Content-Related Validity Evidence
104(2)
Content-Related Evidence for Mathematics
106(9)
Content-Related Evidence for Reading
115(5)
Criterion-Related Validity Evidence
120(31)
Conclusions
151(3)
Annex: Achievement-Level Descriptors
154(35)
6 Interpretations And Uses Of Naep Achievement Levels
189(30)
Relevant Standards and Committee Sources
189(2)
Intended Users, Interpretations, and Uses
191(6)
NAEP Guidance for Users
197(4)
Actual Uses of Achievement Levels
201(6)
Potential Misinterpretations and Misuses of Achievement Levels
207(5)
Conclusions
212(2)
Annex: Bibliography
214(5)
7 Setting New Standards: Considerations
219(16)
Options for Addressing Change
221(1)
Mathematics
222(5)
Reading
227(2)
Digitally Based Assessment
229(1)
Weighing the Options
230(5)
8 Conclusions And Recommendations
235(26)
Conclusions
236(6)
Setting New Standards: Weighing the Options
242(2)
Recommendations
244(5)
References
249(12)
APPENDIXES
A Agenda for Public Forum
261(4)
B Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff
265