About the Author |
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xv | |
Preface |
|
xvii | |
|
1 Public Health Practice and the Best Available Evidence |
|
|
1 | (30) |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Evidence-Based Public Health Practice: Definitions, Purposes, and Methods |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Characteristics of Evidence-Based Public Health Practice: Community Health and Service Needs, Evidence, Programs, and Evaluation |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
Evidence-Based Medicine and Evidence-Based Public Health |
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
Current Best Available Evidence for Public Health Programs and the Role of Evaluation Research |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
Evaluation and Effectiveness Research: Definitions and Methodological Considerations |
|
|
11 | (4) |
|
Program Costs and Program Effectiveness |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Evaluation Researchers and Other Evaluators and Researchers |
|
|
16 | (7) |
|
Summary of Chapter 1 Public Health Practice and the Best Available Evidence |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (4) |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
2 Community Health and Health Service Needs and Evidence-Based Programs |
|
|
31 | (36) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Identifying Health and Health Care Risks or Needs, Preferences, and Values |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Methods for Assessing Community Health Care and Health Services Needs |
|
|
34 | (27) |
|
Large Databases and Data Sets |
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
Why Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Uses Secondary Data |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
What Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Should Watch For |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Public or Community Forums |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (6) |
|
Online Program and Practice Databases: Where to Find and How to Evaluate Them |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Search Engines and Online Health Information |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
Summary of Chapter 2 Identifying Community Needs and Programs |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
3 Finding the Best Available Evidence: Questions, Practical Concerns, and Ethics |
|
|
67 | (40) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
The Evidence and the Research Literature |
|
|
68 | (16) |
|
Eight Literature Reviewing Tasks |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Choosing an Online Bibliographic Database |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
What Are Your Questions? PICO or Problem (Need), Interventions, Comparison, and Outcome |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
Research Questions, Descriptors, and Key Words |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
More Search Terms: Authors, Titles, Title Words, and Journals and Then Some---Limiting the Search |
|
|
75 | (4) |
|
Searching With Boolean Operators |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Is Everything Worthwhile Published? |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
The Practical Screen, Part 1 Language, Research Design, the Program, Timeliness, and Sponsorship |
|
|
84 | (6) |
|
Checklist of Criteria to Make Research Literature Reviews Practical: The Practical Screen |
|
|
84 | (6) |
|
The Practical Screen, Part 2 Outcomes, Population, Costs, and Ethics |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
The Practical Screen, Part 3 Ethics |
|
|
91 | (7) |
|
Research and the Institutional Review Board |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Three Guiding Principles of Ethical Research |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Limits to Confidentiality |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Evidence-Based Public Health Research and Ethics |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
The Practical Screen and Limits |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Summary of Chapter 3 Finding the Best Available Evidence: Questions, Practical Concerns, and Ethics |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (4) |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
4 Research Design, Validity, and Best Available Evidence |
|
|
107 | (52) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Research Methods and Research Design |
|
|
108 | (14) |
|
The Randomized Controlled Trial: Going for the Gold |
|
|
108 | (10) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
Ensuring Baseline Equivalence: What Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Should Watch For |
|
|
122 | (18) |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
Quasi-Experimental Research Designs |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Nonrandomized Controlled Trials: Concurrent Controls |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Interrupted or Single Time-Series Designs |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
Observational Designs and Controlled Trials: Compare and Contrast |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
The Bottom Line: Internal and External Validity |
|
|
140 | (5) |
|
Internal Validity Is Threatened |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
External Validity Is Threatened |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
The Problem of Incomparable Participants: Statistical Methods to the Rescue |
|
|
145 | (4) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
Summary of Chapter 4 Research Design, Validity, and Best Available Evidence |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (5) |
|
|
155 | (4) |
|
5 Wanted! Valid and Meaningful Data as Proof of Best Available Evidence |
|
|
159 | (52) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Collecting Data: Evaluation's Main Measures |
|
|
160 | (13) |
|
Self-Administered Survey Questionnaires |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Why Researchers Use Self-Administered Survey Questionnaires |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
What Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Should Watch For |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Forced-Choice (Multiple-Choice) Achievement Tests |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Why Researchers Use Multiple-Choice Achievement Tests |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
What Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Should Watch For |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
Why Researchers Use Records |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
What Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Should Watch For |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
Why Researchers Use Observations |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
What Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Should Watch For |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
170 | (2) |
|
Why Researchers Use Interviews |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
What Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Should Watch For |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
Why Researchers Use Vignettes |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
What Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Should Watch For |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Theories of Health Behavior Change: Measurement and Program Planning Guides |
|
|
173 | (17) |
|
Reliability and Validity: A Team Approach |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
Within-Measure Reliability |
|
|
180 | (4) |
|
Between-Measure Reliability |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
Sensitivity and Specificity |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Needing It All or Just Needing Some of It: Reliability, Validity, Sensitivity, and Specificity |
|
|
190 | (9) |
|
Data Collection, Data Analysis, Statistical and Practical Significance |
|
|
191 | (3) |
|
What Evidence-Based Public Health Practice Should Watch For |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
Missing: Where Are the Data? |
|
|
194 | (3) |
|
In the Final Analysis, What Data Are Available? |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Proximate or Surrogate Outcomes |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
Data Collection and Public Health Practice |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
Checklist for Evaluating the Quality of Data Collection Measures |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
Summary of Chapter 5 Wanted! Valid and Meaningful Data as Proof of Best Available Evidence |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (5) |
|
|
207 | (4) |
|
6 The Best Available Evidence: Quality, Strength, Implementation, and Evaluation |
|
|
211 | (46) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Synthesizing and Reporting Results of Research Reviews |
|
|
212 | (17) |
|
|
215 | (3) |
|
Nonrandomized and Observational Studies: TREND and STROBE |
|
|
218 | (2) |
|
Scoring and Grading: Distinguishing Good From Poor-Quality Research Articles |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
Checklist for Scoring and Grading a Study's Methodological Quality |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
Quality, Quantity, and Consistency = Strength of Evidence |
|
|
222 | (4) |
|
Does The Evidence Make the Grade? |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
Reliable and Valid Reviews |
|
|
229 | (16) |
|
Measuring Review Reliability: The Kappa Statistic |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
Reviewing Other Reviews: Narrative Reviews and Systematic Reviews |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
Systematic Reviews: Meta-Analysis |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
How Many People and What Effect? |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
A Checklist of Questions to Guide in Evaluating the Quality of a Meta-Analysis |
|
|
237 | (5) |
|
PRISMA Guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis |
|
|
242 | (3) |
|
Selecting and Implementing Programs |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
Planning and Evaluating Programs |
|
|
246 | (3) |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
Right-to-Left Logic Model |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
Left-to-Right Logic Model |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
Improvement Evaluations: Did the Program Change Behavior? Do We Need to Improve? |
|
|
249 | (2) |
|
Summary of Chapter 6 The Best Available Evidence |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
252 | (2) |
|
|
254 | (3) |
Glossary |
|
257 | (24) |
Author Index |
|
281 | (6) |
Subject Index |
|
287 | |