|
|
1 | (8) |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (12) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
2.2 Fundamentals of Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
2.3 Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
2.4.1 General Presentation of EAs Using Binary Coding |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Description of a Simple EA |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
2.5.1 Representation of Individuals |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
2.6 Evolution Strategies (ESs) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
2.7 Application of EAs to Constrained Problems |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
3 Multi-Objective EAs And Game Theory |
|
|
21 | (18) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
3.2 Definition of A Mult- Objective Problem |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
3.3 Cooperative Games: Pareto Optimality |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
3.4 Competitive Games: Nash Equilibrium |
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
3.4.1 Definition of Nash Equilibrium |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 Coupling Nash Games and GAs |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
3.4.3 Generalization to N Nash Players |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
3.5 Hierarchical Game: Stackelberg |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
3.5.1 Coupling a Stackelberg Game with GAs |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
3.6 Comparison of Analytical Solutions and Numerical Game Solutions for Solving a Two Mathematical Functions Minimisation Problem |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
3.6.1 Analytical Solution |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
3.6.2 Nash/Gas and Stackleberg/Gas Numerical Solutions |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
|
32 | (6) |
|
3.7.1 Algorithms for HAPMOEA and Hybridized Games |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
4 Advanced Techniques for Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) |
|
|
39 | (14) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
4.2 Distributed and Parallel EAS |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
4.3 Hierarchical EAS (HEAs) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
4.4 Asynchronous Evolutionary Algorithmss (EAS) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
4.5.1 Covariance Matrix Adaptation (CMA) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 Pareto Tournament Selection |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
4.6.1 Virtual And Real Nash-Games |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
4.6.2 Nash-Game and Hierarchical Asynchronous Parallel EAs (NASH-HAPEA) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
4.6.3 Hybrid-Game Coupled with Single-Objective or Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
4.7 Meta Model Assisted EAS |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
5 Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation and Robust Design in Aerospace Systems |
|
|
53 | (16) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
5.2 Conceptual, Preliminary and Detailed Design |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
5.3 Multi-Disciplinary Design Analysis (MDA) and Optimisation |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Challenges and needs for MDO |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
5.3.3 MDO Application Using Gradient-Based Methods |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (5) |
|
5.4.1 Multi-Disciplinary Design Feasible (MDF) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Individual Discipline Feasible (IDF) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
5.4.3 Collaborative Optimization (CO) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
5.4.4 Criteria and Performance of MDO Implementations |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
5.5 Uncertainty Based Robust Design |
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
5.5.1 Robust/Uncertainty Method |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
5.5.2 From Single-Objective to Multi-Objective Design Optimisation Using the Robust Design Method |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
5.5.3 Robust Multi-Objective/Multi-Disciplinary Design Optimization |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
5.6 Limitations of Traditional Optimisation Techniques for MDO and Robust Design |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
5.6.1 MDO Using Traditional Method and Evolutionary Algorithms |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
5.6.2 Advantages and Drawbacks of Robust Design |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
6 A Framework for Numerical Design and Optimization Algorithms |
|
|
69 | (20) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
6.2 An Optimization Framework |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
6.3 Implementation of the Framework |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
6.4 Optimization Methodology |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
6.5 Optimization Algorithms |
|
|
76 | (10) |
|
6.5.1 Overall Optimization Algorithm |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
6.5.2 A Generic Problem for Analysis Algorithm |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
6.5.3 Single-Objective Design Optimization Algorithm |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
6.5.4 Multi-Objective Design Optimization Algorithm |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
6.5.5 Optimization Algorithm with Multi-objective Hierarchical Evolutionary Algorithms |
|
|
80 | (4) |
|
6.5.6 Multi-Disciplinary Design Optimization Algorithm |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
6.6 Robust Design Optimization |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
7 Single Objective Model Test Case Problems |
|
|
89 | (34) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
7.2 Wing Reconstruction Using Hierarchial Asynchronous Parallel Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorthms (HAPMOEA) and Nash-Evolutionary Algorithms |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
7.3 Active Flow Control Bump Design Optimization |
|
|
92 | (21) |
|
7.3.1 Suction Side SCB Design Optimization |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
7.3.2 Suction and Pressure Sides SCB Design Optimization |
|
|
98 | (6) |
|
7.3.3 Double SCB Design using HAPMOEA |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
7.3.4 Double SCB Design using Hybridized Game |
|
|
106 | (7) |
|
7.4 Generic Aircraft Wing Aerofoil Section Design Optimization |
|
|
113 | (5) |
|
|
118 | (5) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
8 Multi-Objective Optimization Model Test Case Problems |
|
|
123 | (72) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
8.2 Pareto Reconstruction: Two Airfoils at Two Different Design Points |
|
|
123 | (5) |
|
8.3 Multi-Element Airfoil Reconstruction: Two- Dimensional Two Objective Aircraft High Lift System Design and Optimization |
|
|
128 | (8) |
|
8.4 Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Configuration: Conceptual Design Optimisation |
|
|
136 | (10) |
|
8.5 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Mission Path Planning System (Hybridized Game/NSGA-II) |
|
|
146 | (13) |
|
8.5.1 Test 1: Start to Target to Start Position Trajectory Optimization |
|
|
150 | (6) |
|
8.5.2 Test 2: Start to Target to End Position Trajectory Optimization |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
8.6 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Uav) Configuration: Detailed Design Optimisation |
|
|
159 | (18) |
|
8.6.1 Multi-Objective Design Optimisation of UCAV Using Hybridized Games |
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
8.7 Aerostructural Optimisation of a Medium Alitude Long Endurance (Male) UAS |
|
|
177 | (8) |
|
8.8 Aero-Electromagnetic Optimization of a UAS |
|
|
185 | (6) |
|
|
191 | (4) |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
9 Robust Multi-Objective and Multi-Disciplinary Model Optimization Test Cases |
|
|
195 | (70) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
9.2 Robust Active Flow Control Design Optimization |
|
|
195 | (16) |
|
9.2.1 SCB Shape Design Optimisation at 45% of the chord Boundary Layer Transition |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
9.2.2 Robust SCB Shape Design Optimization with Uncertainty Boundary Layer Transitions |
|
|
199 | (12) |
|
9.3 Robust Multi-Objective Generic Aircraft Wing Optimization |
|
|
211 | (7) |
|
9.4 Robust Aero-Structural Generic Aircraft Wing Optimization |
|
|
218 | (11) |
|
9.5 Robust Aero-Electromagnetic Design Optimization of UAS |
|
|
229 | (23) |
|
9.5.1 Robust Multi-Disciplinary Design Optimisation of UCAS Using HAPMOEA Software |
|
|
231 | (8) |
|
9.5.2 Robust Multi-Disciplinary Design Optimization of UCAS Using Hybridized Games |
|
|
239 | (13) |
|
9.6 Robust Multi-Disciplinary Aero-Electro-Structural UCAV Design Optimization |
|
|
252 | (9) |
|
|
261 | (3) |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
10 Robust Airfoil Design Optimization with Morphing Techniques |
|
|
265 | (20) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
10.2 Morphing Airfoil/Wing Design Mechanism: Leading and Trailing Edge Deformation |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
10.2.1 Parameterization of Morphing Aerofoil/Wing: Leading and Trailing Edge Deformation |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
10.3 Morphing Airfoil/Wing Design Optimisation at Cruise Flight Conditions |
|
|
267 | (10) |
|
10.3.1 Trailing Edge Deformation (TED) Design Optimisation |
|
|
267 | (4) |
|
10.3.2 Robust Leading and Trailing Edge Deformation (LTED) Design Optimization |
|
|
271 | (6) |
|
10.4 Morphing Airfoil/Wing Design Optimization at Take-Off and Landing Conditions Using Moga and Hybridized Game with Moga |
|
|
277 | (7) |
|
10.5 Conclusion and Future Research |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
10.6 Summary of Chapter 10 |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
Appendix: Two "Hands-On" Examples of Optimization Problems |
|
|
285 | (20) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
A.2 Reconstruction of BI-NACA Using HAPEA and NASH-EA |
|
|
285 | (10) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
A.2.2 Definition of the Test Case |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
|
286 | (4) |
|
A.2.4 Software and Computer Facilities Needed for Solving the Inverse Problem |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
A.2.5 A Step by Step Design Optimisation Procedure |
|
|
291 | (1) |
|
A.2.6 Analysis and Synthesis of Results Obtained by HAPEA and Nash-EAs Software |
|
|
292 | (2) |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
A.3 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Design: Multi-Objective Optimization |
|
|
295 | (10) |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
A.3.2 Definition of the Test Case |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
|
297 | (3) |
|
A.3.4 Software Needed for Solving the Optimization Problem and Computer Used |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
A.3.5 A Step-by-Step Design Optimization Procedure |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
A.3.6 Analysis and synthesis of results obtained by HAPMOEA software |
|
|
301 | (3) |
|
|
304 | (1) |
References |
|
305 | |