Preface |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xii | |
List of abbreviations |
|
xiv | |
1 Introduction |
|
1 | (32) |
|
1.1 Background and rationale |
|
|
1 | (4) |
|
1.2 Proposal in a nutshell |
|
|
5 | (7) |
|
1.2.1 What did proto-syntax look like? |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
1.2.2 A method of reconstruction based on Minimalism |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
1.4 Can natural/sexual selection be relevant for syntax? |
|
|
14 | (6) |
|
1.5 Corroboration and testing |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
1.6 A brief comparison with Jackendoff's (and other) approaches |
|
|
21 | (5) |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
1.8 Chapter-by-chapter overview |
|
|
29 | (4) |
2 The small (clause) beginnings |
|
33 | (24) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.2 Root small clauses in English |
|
|
34 | (6) |
|
2.3 (Unaccusative) Root small clauses in Serbian |
|
|
40 | (4) |
|
2.4 Small clause syntax is rigid (no Move, no recursion) |
|
|
44 | (5) |
|
2.5 Corroborating evidence and testing grounds |
|
|
49 | (7) |
|
2.5.1 Language acquisition |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
2.5.4 Genetics and the FOXP2 gene |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
2.5.5 Stratification accounts elsewhere |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
3 The intransitive two-word stage: Absolutives, unaccusatives, and middles as precursors to transitivity |
|
57 | (29) |
|
3.1 Introduction: The two-word stage |
|
|
57 | (5) |
|
3.2 Intransitive absolutives |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
3.3 More on living fossils: What is it that unaccusatives, exocentrics, and absolutives have in common? |
|
|
65 | (10) |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
3.3.2 Exocentric compounds |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
3.3.4 More absolutive-like patterns in nominative/accusative languages |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
3.3.4.3 Clausal complements |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
3.4 Precursors to transitivity |
|
|
75 | (6) |
|
3.4.1 Serial verb constructions |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 The "middle" ground |
|
|
76 | (5) |
|
3.5 Corroborating evidence and testing grounds |
|
|
81 | (4) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
4 Parataxis and coordination as precursors to hierarchy: Evolving recursive grammars |
|
86 | (45) |
|
4.1 Hypothesized evolutionary stages of syntax |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
4.2 Paratactic proto-syntax stage |
|
|
89 | (13) |
|
4.2.1 Operation Conjoin: Clause-internally and clause-externally |
|
|
89 | (6) |
|
4.2.2 Paratactic grammar vs separate utterances |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
4.2.3 Absolutes and correlatives: More on Conjoin |
|
|
99 | (3) |
|
4.3 The proto-coordination stage |
|
|
102 | (7) |
|
4.4 The specific functional category stage |
|
|
109 | (14) |
|
4.4.1 From linkers to specific functional categories |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
4.4.4 Benefits of subordination |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
4.4.5 Possible precursors to Move |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
4.4.6 Transitions and overlaps |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
4.5 Corroborating evidence |
|
|
123 | (6) |
|
4.5.1 Corroborating evidence for the paratactic stage |
|
|
123 | (5) |
|
4.5.1.1 Ancient languages |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
4.5.1.2 Grammaticalization |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
4.5.1.3 Comparative studies: Animal communication |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 Corroborating evidence for a proto-coordination stage |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (2) |
5 Islandhood (Subjacency) as an epiphenomenon of evolutionary tinkering |
|
131 | (13) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
5.2 What is islandhood/subjacency? |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
5.3 Why there is no principled account of islandhood |
|
|
135 | (4) |
|
5.4 Subjacency in the light of evolution |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
|
142 | (2) |
6 Exocentric VN compounds: The best fossils |
|
144 | (30) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
6.2 Paratactic grammar behind VN compounds |
|
|
145 | (7) |
|
6.2.1 Absolutive-like proto-predication |
|
|
145 | (4) |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
6.3 A comparison with the hierarchical verbal compounds |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
6.4 A surprising verb form: The imperative |
|
|
156 | (6) |
|
6.5 Crosslinguistic distribution and parallels |
|
|
162 | (5) |
|
6.5.1 VN compounds in other Slavic languages |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
6.5.2 VN compounds in Romance languages |
|
|
163 | (3) |
|
6.5.3 VN compounds in non-Indo-European languages |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
6.6 VN compounds and sexual selection |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
6.7 Corroborating evidence and testing grounds |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
6.9 Appendix 1: Additional English VN compounds |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
6.10 Appendix 2: Additional (mostly coarse) VN compounds as Serbian people and place names |
|
|
172 | (2) |
7 The plausibility of natural selection for syntax |
|
174 | (33) |
|
7.1 Concrete and selectable advantages accrued by each stage |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
7.2 From one-word to two-word utterances: Vagueness galore |
|
|
175 | (5) |
|
7.3 From the two-word stage to hierarchical syntax: Evolving transitivity, displacement, and recursion |
|
|
180 | (13) |
|
7.3.1 Introductory remarks |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 Grammaticalizing tense |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
7.3.3 Grammaticalizing transitivity |
|
|
183 | (4) |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
7.3.5 Historical change vs language evolution |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
7.4 A detailed selection scenario |
|
|
193 | (5) |
|
7.5 The timeline for the evolution of language |
|
|
198 | (9) |
|
7.5.1 Was there enough time? |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (8) |
8 Conclusion |
|
207 | (4) |
Appendix Testing grounds: Neuroimaging Co-authored with Noa Ofen |
|
211 | (8) |
References |
|
219 | (28) |
Index of languages and language groups |
|
247 | (2) |
Index of names |
|
249 | (6) |
Index of subjects |
|
255 | |