Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Freedom from Religion and Human Rights Law: Strengthening the Right to Freedom of Religion and Belief for Non-Religious and Atheist Rights-Holders

(Australia)
  • Formaat - EPUB+DRM
  • Hind: 61,09 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

Although human rights belong to all persons on the basis of their humanity, this book demonstrates that in the practice of international human rights law, the freedom to be non-religious or atheist does not receive the same protection as the freedom to be religious. Despite the claimed universality of freedom of religion and belief contained in article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the key assertion made is that there is a hierarchy of religion and belief, with followers of major established religions enjoying high protection and low regulation at the top, and atheists and non-believers enduring high persecution and weaker protection at the bottom. The existence of this hierarchy is proven and critiqued through three case study chapters that respectively explore the extent to which non-religious and atheist rights-holders enjoy freedom from proselytism, freedom from hate, and freedom from the religions of their parents.

Acknowledgements viii
Introduction 1(3)
1 Freedom of religion or belief
4(28)
1 The meaning of `religion' and `belief' in international law
4(11)
Article 18
4(1)
1.1 Defining `religion' and `belief'
5(5)
1.2 Pluralism as the guiding principle
10(5)
2 ICCPR Article 18 and the plurality of religion and belief
15(7)
2.1 Freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief
15(4)
2.2 Freedom to manifest religion or belief
19(2)
2.3 Freedom from coercion
21(1)
3 Limitations to manifestations
22(8)
3.1 Fewer limitations to article 18 than for other rights
23(1)
3.2 Limitations favour religion over non-religion
24(3)
3.3 Non-derogability of article 18
27(3)
4 Conclusion: The limits of article 18 to protect freedom from religion
30(2)
2 The hierarchy of religion and belief
32(30)
1 Established, major religions at the top of the hierarchy
32(11)
1.1 High influence of religious non-state actors
33(6)
1.2 Weak regulation of religious non-state actors
39(4)
2 New, unusual or emerging religions and beliefs
43(7)
2.1 High persecution of new or `unusual' religions
44(3)
2.2 Low protection of new or `unusual' religions
47(3)
3 Non-religion and atheism at the bottom of the hierarchy
50(9)
3.1 High persecution of non-believers and atheists
50(4)
3.2 Low protection of non-believers and atheists
54(5)
4 Conclusion: Non-religious and atheist rights-holders neglected
59(3)
3 Freedom from proselytism
62(28)
1 Proselytism as a manifestation of religion
63(6)
1.1 Advantage of proselytism to major religions
64(2)
1.2 Disadvantage of non-proselytising religions and beliefs
66(2)
1.3 Non-applicability of right to proselytise to non-religious rights-holders
68(1)
2 Forms of improper coercion
69(14)
2.1 Proselytism through threats or violence
71(7)
2.2 Proselytism through exploitation of circumstance
78(3)
2.3 Proselytism through exposure to religious symbols
81(2)
3 Determining where coercion undermines choice
83(5)
3.1 Attributes of the source and target of proselytism
83(2)
3.2 Location and nature of proselytism
85(2)
3.3 Context of the proselytism
87(1)
4 Conclusion: The need to prioritise rights over religions
88(2)
4 Freedom from hate
90(25)
1 Article 20 and hate speech in the name of religion
90(6)
2 Pro-religious bias of article 20
96(13)
2.1 Hatred in the name of religion
99(4)
2.2 Homophobia: Prohibited discrimination or a religious right?
103(6)
3 Weak protection of non-believers and atheists from hate speech
109(4)
4 Conclusion: Curtailing incitement of violence against atheists
113(2)
5 Freedom from parents
115(28)
1 Balancing rights of parents and children
116(8)
1.1 The rights and liberties of parents over their children
117(2)
1.2 The rights and evolving capacities of the child
119(5)
2 Freedom from coercive religious or moral education
124(5)
2.1 The liberties of the parent
126(2)
2.2 The best interests of the child
128(1)
3 Freedom from religious circumcision
129(12)
3.1 The child's right to health
130(7)
3.2 The child's freedom of religion and belief
137(4)
4 Conclusion: The need to protect children from their parents
141(2)
6 Conclusion
143(17)
1 Indefensibility of pro-religious bias of human rights law
143(11)
1.1 Relevance of the inherent value of religion and belief
143(5)
1.2 Relevance of religion or belief in social life
148(6)
2 Freedom from religion as the measure of religious freedom
154(6)
2.1 Pluralism as the guiding principle
154(3)
2.2 Freedom from religion as the litmus test
157(3)
Bibliography 160(20)
Index 180
Marika McAdam is an independent legal consultant and adviser who has worked for the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights, the International Organization for Migration and the Nexus Institute among other organisations.