Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Functions of General Nouns : Theory and Corpus Analysis

  • Formaat: EPUB+DRM
  • Sari: English Corpus Linguistics 17
  • Ilmumisaeg: 06-Nov-2018
  • Kirjastus: Peter Lang AG
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783631760192
  • Formaat - EPUB+DRM
  • Hind: 61,11 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: EPUB+DRM
  • Sari: English Corpus Linguistics 17
  • Ilmumisaeg: 06-Nov-2018
  • Kirjastus: Peter Lang AG
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783631760192

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

The study provides a comprehensive description of ‹general nouns› from a micro- and macro-linguistic perspective. A corpus of different spoken and written genres is the basis for a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis, which shows that ‘general nouns’ fulfil various genre-specific functions.



The author critically discusses the concept of ‹general nouns›, which Halliday/Hasan introduced in their approach to lexical cohesion (1976), and she provides a comprehensive overview of these nouns from a micro- and a macro-linguistic perspective. For the empirical analysis, the author compiled a corpus, which allows statements about a medium- and genre-specific use of ‹general nouns›. For this purpose, she developed an analytical tool, which takes into account formal and semantic features. The major outcome of the corpus analysis is that ‹general nouns› are much more flexible in form and function than Halliday/Hasan assumed and, most importantly, that they fulfil genre-specific functions some of which have not systematically been associated with lexical cohesion.

List of tables and figures
15(6)
1 Introduction
21(4)
1.1 Aim of the study
22(1)
1.2 Structure of the study
23(2)
2 A linguistic discussion of `general nouns'
25(18)
2.1 Halliday/Hasaris approach to `general nouns'
25(13)
2.1.1 The concept of `cohesion'
25(3)
2.1.2 The concept of `reference'
28(5)
2.1.3 The concept of `reiteration'
33(2)
2.1.4 The concept of `general nouns'
35(3)
2.2 Previous studies of `general nouns'
38(3)
2.3 Critical evaluation of the status of `general nouns'
41(2)
3 Approaches to general noun phrases across different linguistic disciplines
43(44)
3.1 Introduction
43(1)
3.2 The grammatical approach to general noun phrases
44(10)
3.2.1 Classification of nouns
44(2)
3.2.2 Modification
46(5)
3.2.3 Classification of general noun phrase heads
51(3)
3.3 The text-linguistic approach to general noun phrases
54(8)
3.3.1 Constitutive features of textual communication
54(4)
3.3.2 Regulative features of textual communication
58(2)
3.3.3 Restricted and elaborated style of referencing
60(2)
3.4 The pragmatic approach to general noun phrases
62(11)
3.4.1 The Cooperative Principle
62(4)
3.4.2 Vagueness in language
66(1)
3.4.2.1 Defining vagueness
67(2)
3.4.2.2 Types of vagueness
69(4)
3.5 The cognitive approach to general noun phrases
73(11)
3.5.1 Categorisation
73(3)
3.5.2 Context-dependence of categories
76(1)
3.5.3 Categorisation and general noun phrases
77(1)
3.5.3.1 Introduction
77(4)
3.5.3.2 General noun phrases as "empty containers"
81(1)
3.5.3.3 General noun phrases as "full containers"
82(2)
3.6 Summary: A workable definition of general noun phrases
84(3)
4 Framework for the analysis of general noun phrases
87(18)
4.1 Combination of structural and semantic parameters of general noun phrases
87(7)
4.1.1 Structural parameters of general noun phrases: +/- Modification
88(1)
4.1.1.1 Non-modified general noun phrase heads: - Modification
88(1)
4.1.1.2 Modified general noun phrase heads: + Modification
89(2)
4.1.2 Semantic parameters of general noun phrases: +/- Linkage
91(1)
4.1.2.1 Non-linked general noun phrases: - Linkage
92(1)
4.1.2.2 Linked general noun phrases: + Linkage
93(1)
4.2 Functional matrix for the analysis of general noun phrases
94(3)
4.3 The scale of specification
97(2)
4.4 General assumptions for the analysis of general noun phrases
99(6)
5 Corpus compilation
105(22)
5.1 The corpus-linguistic approach of the present study
105(2)
5.2 Medium-, domain- and genre-specific features of the corpus data
107(7)
5.2.1 Some features of spoken and written language
107(2)
5.2.2 Some features of legal language
109(2)
5.2.3 Some features of political language
111(2)
5.2.4 Some features of conversation
113(1)
5.3 The corpus of the present study
114(13)
5.3.1 Written corpus
114(1)
5.3.1.1 Supreme Court judgments
114(2)
5.3.1.2 Political manifestos
116(1)
5.3.2 Spoken corpus
117(1)
5.3.2.1 Parliamentary debates
117(3)
5.3.2.2 General conversations
120(2)
5.3.3 Summary: Overview of corpus data
122(5)
6 Methodology
127(24)
6.1 Methods for the quantitative analysis
127(5)
6.1.1 From raw to relevant data
127(4)
6.1.2 Determining the frequency of relevant general noun phrase heads
131(1)
6.2 Methods for the qualitative analysis
132(19)
6.2.1 The coding system used in the present study
132(4)
6.2.2 The parameter modification
136(1)
6.2.2.1 Types of premodification
136(2)
6.2.2.2 Types of postmodification
138(3)
6.2.3 The parameter linkage
141(1)
6.2.3.1 Types of endophoric reference
141(1)
6.2.3.1.1 Halliday/Hasan's endophoric reference
141(1)
6.2.3.1.2 Encapsulation
142(2)
6.2.3.1.3 Reference between appositive units
144(1)
6.2.3.1.4 Reference between subject and complement
145(2)
6.2.3.1.5 Remote reference
147(1)
6.2.3.2 Generic reference
148(3)
7 Corpus analysis
151(86)
7.1 Quantitative analysis: Frequencies and distribution of relevant general noun phrase heads in the corpora
151(22)
7.1.1 Quantitative results from the judgment corpus
151(4)
7.1.2 Quantitative results from the manifesto corpus
155(4)
7.1.3 Quantitative results from the debate corpus
159(2)
7.1.4 Conversation corpus
161(4)
7.1.5 Summary and comparison of results
165(8)
7.2 Qualitative analysis: The degree of specification of relevant general noun phrases in the corpora
173(64)
7.2.1 Qualitative results from the judgment corpus
173(6)
7.2.1.1 `Most specific general noun phrases in the judgment corpus
179(5)
7.2.1.2 `Rather specific' general noun phrases in the judgment corpus
184(3)
7.2.1.3 `Less specific' general noun phrases in the judgment corpus
187(3)
7.2.1.4 `Least specific' general noun phrases in the judgment corpus
190(1)
7.2.2 Qualitative results from the manifesto corpus
191(3)
7.2.2.1 `Most specific' general noun phrases in the manifesto corpus
194(3)
7.2.2.2 `Rather specific' general noun phrases in the manifesto corpus
197(1)
7.2.2.3 `Less specific' general noun phrases in the manifesto corpus
198(2)
7.2.2.4 `Least specific' general noun phrases in the manifesto corpus
200(1)
7.2.3 Qualitative results from the debate corpus
201(4)
7.2.3.1 `Most specific' general noun phrases in the debate corpus
205(4)
7.2.3.2 `Rather specific' general noun phrases in the debate corpus
209(1)
7.2.3.3 `Less specific' general noun phrases in the debate corpus
210(2)
7.2.3.4 `Least specific' general noun phrases in the debate corpus
212(1)
7.2.4 Qualitative results from the conversation corpus
213(5)
7.2.4.1 `Most specific general noun phrases in the conversation corpus
218(2)
7.2.4.2 `Rather specific general noun phrases in the conversation corpus
220(1)
7.2.4.3 `Less specific' general noun phrases in the conversation corpus
221(4)
7.2.4.4 `Least specific' general noun phrases in the conversation corpus
225(1)
7.2.5 Summary and comparison of results
226(11)
8 Summary and conclusions
237(12)
References 249
Vera Benninghoven has taught linguistics at the English department of the University of Bonn and the University of Cologne. Her research interests include morphology, lexicology, text-linguistics and corpus-linguistics.