Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Functions and Generality of Logic: Reflections on Dedekind's and Frege's Logicisms

  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 55,56 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This book examines three connected aspects of Frege’s logicism: the differences between Dedekind’s and Frege’s interpretation of the term ‘logic’ and related terms and reflects on Frege’s notion of function, comparing its understanding and the role it played in Frege’s and Lagrange’s foundational programs. It concludes with an examination of the notion of arbitrary function, taking into account Frege’s, Ramsey’s and Russell’s view on the subject. Composed of three chapters, this book sheds light on important aspects of Dedekind’s and Frege’s logicisms. The first chapter explains how, although he shares Frege’s aim at substituting logical standards of rigor to intuitive imports from spatio-temporal experience into the deductive presentation of arithmetic, Dedekind had a different goal and used or invented different tools. The chapter highlights basic dissimilarities between Dedekind’s and Frege’s actual ways of doing and thinking. The second chapter reflects on Frege’s notion of a function, in comparison with the notions endorsed by Lagrange and the followers of the program of arithmetization of analysis. It remarks that the foundational programs pursued by Lagrange and Frege are crucially different and based on a different idea of what the foundations of mathematics should be like. However, despite this contrast, the notion of function plays similar roles in the two programs, and this chapter emphasizes the similarities. The third chapter traces the development of thinking about Frege’s program in the foundations of mathematics, and includes comparisons of Frege’s, Russell’s and Ramsey’s views. The chapter discusses earlier papers written by Hintikka, Sandu, Demopoulos and Trueman. Although the chapter’s main focus is on the notion of arbitrary correlation, it starts out by discussing some aspects of the connection between this notion and Dedekind Theorem.

Arvustused

This book brings together three independently written but complementary contributions on logicism by three experienced specialists. All in all, the book contributes to an enhanced understanding of the nature, the motives, and the mutual differences between various forms of logicism. The book provides highly interesting advanced reading for anyone concerned with the systematic and historical details of logicism. It also includes a shared introduction for all three chapters. (Risto Vilkko, Mathematical Reviews, February, 2016)

The aim of the book is to shed some light onto the roots of logicism, especially in Freges approach, but also in Dedekinds writings. This book is an example of excellent historical analysis of foundational questions. It is of particular interest for researchers in the philosophy of mathematics. (AndrzejIndrzejczak, zbMATH 1330.03009, 2016)

Introduction ix
1 Is Dedekind a Logicist? Why Does Such a Question Arise?
1(58)
Hourya Benis-Sinaceur
1.1 Introduction
1(7)
1.2 The Logicist Thesis
8(6)
1.2.1 The "New Logic"
8(2)
1.2.2 Logicist Foundations of Mathematics
10(4)
1.3 Similar Claims, Different Fundamental Conceptions
14(14)
1.3.1 Reason Versus Intuition and the Foundations of Arithmetic
15(5)
1.3.2 Pure Thought, Objectivity, Logic, Proof
20(7)
1.3.3 More on Inference: Truths and Logical Truths
27(1)
1.4 On Definitions
28(14)
1.4.1 Dedekind's Definition by Axioms
28(1)
1.4.2 Frege's Ontological Conception of Definitions of Objects
29(3)
1.4.3 Frege's Epistemology
32(2)
1.4.4 Dedekind's Treppen-Verstand and Stuckeweise Definitions
34(1)
1.4.5 Frege's Criticism of Dedekind's Stuckweise and Creative Definitions
35(3)
1.4.6 Frege's Technical Conception of Definitions
38(2)
1.4.7 Frege's and Dedekind's Philosophical Assumptions
40(2)
1.5 System and Abbildung: Structuralism and/or Logicism
42(13)
1.5.1 Concept
42(4)
1.5.2 System and Abbildung: the Search of Generality
46(7)
1.5.3 Dedekind's Chains and Frege's Following in a φ-Sequence
53(2)
1.6 Conclusions
55(4)
2 From Lagrange to Frege: Functions and Expressions
59(38)
Marco Panza
2.1 Introduction
59(1)
2.2 Lagrange's Notion of a Function
60(4)
2.3 Arbitrary Functions and the Arithmetisation of Analysis
64(6)
2.4 Functions in Frege's Grundgesetze
70(23)
2.4.1 Elucidating the Notion of a Function
71(4)
2.4.2 How (First-Level) Functions Work in the Begriffsschrift
75(5)
2.4.3 (First-level) Functions and Names of Functions
80(8)
2.4.4 Compositionality of Functions, Higher-Level Functions, and the Notion of an Arbitrary Function
88(5)
2.5 Concluding Remarks
93(4)
3 Frege, Russell, Ramsey and the Notion of an Arbitrary Function
97(20)
Gabriel Sandu
3.1 The Background
97(2)
3.2 The Standard versus Non-standard Distinction and Dedekind Theorem
99(1)
3.3 The Isomorphism Theorem
100(4)
3.4 Ramsey's Notion of a Predicative Function in "Foundations of Mathematics"
104(2)
3.5 Ramsey's Reduction of Type (2)
106(8)
3.5.1 Logical Necessity versus Analytical Necessity
107(1)
3.5.2 Ramsey's Propositional Functions in Extension
108(2)
3.5.3 Sullivan's Objection to the Notion of Propositional Function in Extension: Containment
110(1)
3.5.4 Substitution
111(1)
3.5.5 Arbitrary Functions
112(2)
3.6 Conclusion
114(3)
Bibliography 117
Hourya Benis Sinaceur is Research Director at the CNRS. Her publications include Corps et Modèles, Paris, Vrin, 1991, second ed. 1999; Le labyrinthe du continu (co-ed. with avec J.-M. Salanskis), Springer-Verlag France,1992, Cavaillès. Philosophie mathématique, Paris, PUF, 1994; Tarski's Address at the Princeton University Bicentennial Conference on problems of Mathematics (December 17-19, 1946), typescript ed. with additional material and an Introduction, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 6, n° 1 (Mars 2000), p. 1-44; Alfred Tarski : Semantic shift, heuristic shift in Metamathematics, Synthese 126, pp. 49-65, 2001. She is member of the Comité National d'Histoire et Philosophie des Sciences de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris and Membre correspondant de lAcadémie Internationale dHistoire des Sciences. Marco Panza is Research Director at the CNRS. He is the author of several book and paper (published in several idioms) concerning history and philosophy of mathematics. The former include: Newton et les orgines de lAnalyse: 1664-1666, Blanchard, Paris, 2005; Platos Problem. Introduction to Mathematical Platonism, Palgrave MacMillan, Bsingstoke (UK), 2013 (co-authored with Andrea Sereni). He is member of the Steering Committee of the Association for the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (APMP), which he contributed to found. Gabriel Sandu is professor of theoretical philosophy whose main contributions are in logic, game-theoretical semantics, IF logic, and truth theories. He also published on Frege and Ransey. His publications includes: Independence-friendli Logic: A game-theoretic approach, CUP, Cambridge, 2011 (Coauthored with A. Mann and M. Sevenster); On the methodology of lingustics: A case study, Blackwell, Oxford, 1991 (Coauthored with J. Hintikka).