|
|
xi | |
|
|
xiii | |
Time-Management Working-Group member and contributor details |
|
xv | |
Preface |
|
xix | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xxv | |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.5 Applicability of the Guide |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.6 Planning and scheduling |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.7 The project scheduler |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (8) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
2.6 Planning method statement |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
2.8 Time-management quality control |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
3 Developing the time-model |
|
|
17 | (56) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
3.2 Developing the schedule |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Occupational commissioning schedule |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
3.4 Scheduling techniques |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Arrow-diagram method (ADM) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Precedence-diagram method (PDM) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
3.5 Resource planning and scheduling |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
3.6 Software considerations |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (11) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Colours, fonts and graphics |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
The structure of the schedule |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Activity-identifier codes |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Scheduling at low density |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Scheduling at medium density |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Scheduling at high density |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Utilities and third-party projects |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
|
37 | (36) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Descriptions at low density |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Descriptions at medium density |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Descriptions at high density |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Ascertaining activity durations |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Durations at medium density |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Durations at high density |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Comparison with other projects |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Calculation from resources and work content |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Calendars at medium density |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Calendars at high density |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Cost coding at low density |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Cost coding at medium density |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Cost coding at high density |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Lagged start-to-start and finish-to-finish |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Inflexible combinations of constraints |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Contingencies at low density |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Contingencies at medium density |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Contingencies at high density |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Planning method statement |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
Method statement at low density |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Method statement at medium density |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
Method statement at high density |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Review for schedule content |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Review for schedule integrity |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Review for scheduling options |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Review for critical paths |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Documentation of corrections |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
4 Managing the time-model |
|
|
73 | (28) |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
4.2 Schedule review and revision |
|
|
75 | (4) |
|
Managing the review and revision process |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
General matters for review |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Review for better information |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Better design information |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Better procurement information |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Refinements to work content |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Review for short-term work |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (8) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Spreadsheet-recorded data |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
4.4 Updating the schedule |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (6) |
|
Indentifying intervening events |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Voluntary and implied variations and other instructed changes |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Prime cost and provisional sums |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Employer's acts or omissions |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Acts or omissions of third parties |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
Calculating the effect of intervening events |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (7) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Acceleration and recovery |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
5 Communicating and integrating the model |
|
|
101 | (8) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
In the last reporting period |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
In the medium-term and long-term future |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
In the next reporting period |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
5.4 Feedback and benchmarking |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
|
109 | (18) |
|
1 Appendix 1 - Time risks which may be borne by the employer |
|
|
109 | (4) |
|
2 Appendix 2 - Desirable attributes of scheduling software |
|
|
113 | (10) |
|
3 Appendix 3 - Sample notice of delay |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
4 Appendix 4 - Industry productivity guides common in the UK |
|
|
125 | (2) |
Glossary of terms |
|
127 | (12) |
Index |
|
139 | |