Section I Multiple Sources of Data |
|
|
Chapter 1 Introduction to data sources and outcome models |
|
|
3 | (10) |
|
|
|
1.1 Introduction To Outcome Modeling |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
1.3 Types Of Outcome Models |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
1.3.1 Prognostic versus predictive models |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.3.2 Top-down versus bottom-up models |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.3.3 Analytical versus data-driven models |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
1.4 Types Of Data Used In Outcome Models |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.5 The Five Steps Towards Building An Outcome Model |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
Chapter 2 Clinical data in outcome models |
|
|
13 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
2.2 Collagen Vascular Disease |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
2.4 Biological Factors Impacting Toxicity After SBRT |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
2.4.1 Chest wall toxicity after SBRT |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT) after SBRT |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
2.4.3 Radiation-induced liver damage (RILD) after SBRT |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
Chapter 3 Imaging data (radiomics) |
|
|
25 | (8) |
|
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
3.2 Image Features Extraction |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
3.2.1 Static image features |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Dynamic image features |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
3.3 Radiomics Examples From Different Cancer Sites |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
3.3.1 Predicting local control in lung cancer using PET/CT |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
3.3.2 Predicting distant metastasis in sarcoma using PET/MR |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
Chapter 4 Dosimetric data |
|
|
33 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
4.3 Equivalent Uniform Dose |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
4.4 Dosimetric Model Variable Selection |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
4.4.1 Model order based on information theory |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 Model order based on resampling methods |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
4.5 A Dosimetric Modeling Example |
|
|
39 | (5) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
4.5.3 Multivariate modeling with logistic regression |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
4.5.4 Multivariate modeling with machine learning |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
4.5.5 Comparison with other known models |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
4.6 Software Tools For Dosimetric Outcome Modeling |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
Chapter 5 Pre-clinical radiobiological insights to inform modelling of radiotherapy outcome |
|
|
47 | (6) |
|
|
|
5.1 Variability In Response To Highly Standardized Radio-Therapy |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
5.2 Variation In Sensitivity To Radiation |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
5.3 Understanding Dose-Response Of Tissues And Organs |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
5.4 Animal Models To Study Radiation Response |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
5.5 Processes Governing Outcome |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
5.6 Patient-Individual Factors/Co-Morbidity |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
6.2 Biomarkers And The World Of "-Omics" |
|
|
54 | (5) |
|
6.2.1 Structural variations |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
6.2.1.1 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
6.2.1.2 Copy number variations (CNVs) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Gene expression: mRNA, miRNA, 1ncRNA |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
6.3 Resources For Biological Data |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
6.4 Examples Of Radiogenomic Modeling |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (3) |
Section II Top-down Modeling Approaches |
|
|
Chapter 7 Analytical and mechanistic modeling |
|
|
65 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
7.2 Track Structure And DNA Damage |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
7.3 Linear-Quadratic Model |
|
|
69 | (4) |
|
7.4 Kinetic Reaction Rate Models |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
7.4.1 Repair-misrepair and lethal-potentially-lethal models |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
7.4.3 The Giant LOop Binary LEsion (GLOBE) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
7.4.4 Local Effect Model (LEM) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
7.4.5 Microdosimetric-kinetic model (MKM) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
7.4.6 The Repair-misrepair-fixation model |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
7.5 Mechanistic Modeling Of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) And Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
7.5.1 LQ limitations and alternative models |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
7.6 Incorporating Biological Data To Describe And Predict Biological Response |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
Chapter 8 Data driven approaches I: conventional statistical inference methods, including linear and logistic regression |
|
|
85 | (44) |
|
|
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (14) |
|
8.2.1 Mathematical formalism |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
8.2.2 Estimation of regression coefficients |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
8.2.3 Accuracy of coefficient estimates |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
8.2.4 Rejecting the null hypothesis |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
8.2.5 Accuracy of the model |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
8.2.6 Qualitative predictors |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
8.2.7 Including interactions between variables |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
8.2.8 Linear regression: example |
|
|
93 | (8) |
|
|
101 | (8) |
|
8.3.1 Modelling of qualitative (binary) response |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
8.3.2 Mathematical formalism |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
8.3.3 Estimation of regression coefficients |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
8.3.4 Accuracy of coefficient estimates |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
8.3.5 Rejecting the null hypothesis, testing the significance of a model |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
8.3.6 Accuracy of the model |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
8.3.7 Qualitative predictors |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
8.3.8 Including interaction between variables |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
8.3.9 Statistical power for reliable predictions |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
8.3.10 Time consideration |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (4) |
|
8.4.1 Apparent validation |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
8.4.2 Internal validation |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
8.4.3 External validation |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
8.5 Evaluation Of An Extended Model |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (14) |
|
8.6.1 Classical approaches |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
8.6.2 Shrinking and regularization methods: LASSO |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
8.6.4 Logistic regression: example |
|
|
118 | (9) |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
Chapter 9 Data driven approaches II: Machine Learning |
|
|
129 | (18) |
|
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
9.2.1 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
9.2.1.1 When should you use them? |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
9.2.1.2 Who has already used them? |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
9.3 Flavors Of Machine Learning |
|
|
134 | (8) |
|
9.3.1 Artificial Neural Networks |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
9.3.1.2 When should you use them? |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
9.3.1.3 Who has already used them? |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
9.3.2 Support Vector Machine |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
9.3.2.2 When should you use them? |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
9.3.2.3 Who has already used them? |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
9.3.3 Decision Trees and Random Forests |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
9.3.3.2 When should you use them? |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
9.3.3.3 Who has already used them? |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
9.3.4 Bayesian approaches |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
9.3.4.2 When should you use them? |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
9.3.4.3 Who has already used them? |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
9.4 Practical Implementation |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 Model fitting and assessment |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (4) |
Section III Bottom-up Modeling Approaches |
|
|
Chapter 10 Stochastic multi-scale modeling of biological effects induced by ionizing radiation |
|
|
147 | (34) |
|
|
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
10.2 Particle Tracks: Physical Stage |
|
|
151 | (10) |
|
10.3 Particle Tracks: Physicochemical And Chemical Stage |
|
|
161 | (4) |
|
10.4 Multi-Scale DNA And Chromatin Models |
|
|
165 | (4) |
|
10.5 Induction Of DBA And Chromatin Damage |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
|
172 | (7) |
|
10.7 Modeling Beyond Single-Cell Level |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
Chapter 11 Multi-scale modeling approaches: application in chemo- and immuno-therapies |
|
|
181 | (16) |
|
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
11.2 Medical Oncology Treatments |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
11.2.1 From chemotherapy to molecular targeted agents |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (5) |
|
11.3.1 Continuum tumor modeling |
|
|
185 | (3) |
|
11.3.2 Discrete tumor modeling |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
11.3.3 Hybrid tumor modeling |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
11.4.1 Modeling of chemotherapy |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
11.4.2 Modeling of immunotherapy |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
11.5 Software Tools For Multi-Scale Modeling |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
194 | (3) |
Section IV Example Applications in Oncology |
|
|
Chapter 12 Outcome modeling in treatment planning |
|
|
197 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
|
199 | (3) |
|
12.1.1 Review of the history and dose-volume based treatment plan- ning and its limitations |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
12.1.2 Emerging dose-response modeling in treatment planning and advantages |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
12.2 Dose-Response Models |
|
|
202 | (6) |
|
12.2.1 Generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
12.2.1.1 Serial and parallel organ models |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
12.2.2 Linear-Quadratic (LQ) Model |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
12.2.3 Biological effective dose (BED) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
12.2.4 Tumor control probability (TCP) models |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
12.2.5 Normal Tissue Complication Model (NTCP) models |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
12.2.5.1 Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
12.2.5.2 Relative seriality (RS) model |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
12.2.5.3 Model parameters and Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
12.2.6 Combined TCP/NTCP models -Uncomplicated tumor control model (UTCP or P+) |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
12.3 Dose-Response Models For Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) |
|
|
208 | (6) |
|
12.3.1 Linear-Quadratic (LQ) model applied to SBRT |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
12.3.2 Universal survival curve (USC) model |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
12.3.3 Linear-Quadratic-Linear (LQL) model |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
12.3.5 Dose limits for SBRT treatments |
|
|
211 | (3) |
|
12.4 Biological Models In Treatment Planning |
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
12.4.3 Dose summation using biological models |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
12.4.4 Selection of outcome models and model parameters |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
12.5 Commercially Available Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) Employing Outcome Models |
|
|
216 | (8) |
|
12.5.1 Elekta Monaco system (Maryland Heights, MO) |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
12.5.2 Philips Pinnacle system (Andover, MA) |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
12.5.2.1 Sensitivity of model parameters |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
12.5.3 Varian Eclipse system (Palo Alto, CA) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
12.5.3.1 Objective functions in plan optimization |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
12.5.3.3 Sensitivity of model parameters |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
12.5.4 RaySearch RayStation (Stockholm, Sweden) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
12.5.4.1 Plan evaluation tools |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
12.5.4.2 Plan optimization tools |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
12.5.5 MIM (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
Chapter 13 A utility based approach to individualized and adaptive radiation therapy |
|
|
225 | (10) |
|
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
13.2.1 Treatment planning in radiation therapy |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
13.3 Utility Approach To Plan Optimization |
|
|
229 | (5) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
13.3.2 In RT treatment planning |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
13.3.3 Choice of the tradeoff parameter |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
13.3.4 Virtual clinical trial |
|
|
231 | (3) |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
Chapter 14 Outcome modeling in Particle therapy |
|
|
235 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
14.1 How Are Particles Different From Photons? |
|
|
236 | (2) |
|
14.2 Linear Energy Transfer (LET) |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
14.2.1 Dose averaging, track averaging and limitations |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
14.3 Relative Biological Effectiveness |
|
|
240 | (8) |
|
14.3.1 The 1.1 conundrum in proton therapy |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
14.3.2 LET based RBE models |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
14.3.3.1 Track structure (8-ray) model |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
14.4 The Role Of Monte Carlo |
|
|
248 | (5) |
|
14.4.1 Understanding dose and LET distributions |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
14.4.1.1 Range uncertainties |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
14.4.1.2 Considerations for dose and DVH |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
250 | (2) |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
14.4.3 Example MC simulations using TOPAS |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
14.4.3.1 2-spot pencil setup |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
14.4.3.2 Expansion to include patient setup, dose, LET and one RBE scorer |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
14.5 Implications Of Particle Therapy For Outcome Models |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
14.5.2 Normal Tissue effects |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
14.6 Application In Treatment Planning |
|
|
255 | (5) |
|
14.6.1 Vision for the future |
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
Chapter 15 Modeling response to oncological surgery |
|
|
259 | (24) |
|
|
|
Flavio F. Contreras-Torres |
|
|
15.1 Introduction To Oncological Surgery |
|
|
260 | (2) |
|
15.1.1 Clinical and surgical factors modifying patients' outcomes |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
15.1.2 Complementary therapies to oncological surgery |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
15.2 Modeling Of Oncological Surgery |
|
|
262 | (5) |
|
15.2.1 Computational oncology models |
|
|
262 | (2) |
|
15.2.2 Mechanistic models from physical oncology |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
15.2.2.1 Relevant variables |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
15.2.2.2 Implemented models |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
15.3 Example: A Bidimensional Oncological Surgery Simulation Model |
|
|
267 | (7) |
|
15.3.1 Step 1: diffusion of nutrients |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
15.3.2 Step 2: CA rules and tumor growth constrained by the nutrients concentration and immune system response |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
|
271 | (3) |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
15.5 Conclusions And Perspectives |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
|
275 | (8) |
|
Chapter 16 Tools for the precision medicine era: developing highly adaptive and personalized treatment recommendations using SMARTS |
|
|
283 | (82) |
|
|
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
16.2 Studying Treatments In Sequence |
|
|
285 | (5) |
|
16.2.1 Adaptive treatment strategies |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
16.2.3 Tailoring variables are key for personalized recommendations |
|
|
285 | (3) |
|
16.2.4 Machine learning "teaches" us the optimal ATS |
|
|
288 | (2) |
|
16.3 Comparison To Traditional Methods |
|
|
290 | (4) |
|
16.3.1 Why might RCTs fail to identify good treatment sequences? |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
16.3.2 Why can't we combine results from separate, single-stage RCTs? |
|
|
291 | (2) |
|
16.3.3 What are the advantages of SMARTs? |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
16.3.4 Motivating example |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
16.4 Validating A Proposed ATS |
|
|
294 | (3) |
|
16.4.1 If we find an optimal ATS with a SMART, do we still need an RCT? |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
16.4.2 Are SMARTs used in cancer? |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
16.5 Challenges And Opportunities |
|
|
297 | (68) |
Index |
|
365 | |