Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Half-Opened Door: Discrimination and Admissions at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, 1900-1970

  • Formaat: 350 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 12-Jul-2017
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781351481601
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 61,09 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.
  • Formaat: 350 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 12-Jul-2017
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • Keel: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781351481601
Teised raamatud teemal:

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

By the turn of the twentieth century, academic nativism had taken root in elite American collegesspecifically, Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant hegemony was endangered by new kinds of student, many of them Catholic and Jewish immigrants. The newcomers threatened to displace native-born Americans by raising academic standards and winning a disproportionate share of the scholarships.

The Half-Opened Door analyzes the role of these institutions, casting light on their place in class structure and values in the United States. It details the origins, history, and demise of discriminatory admissions processes and depicts how the entrenched position of the upper class was successfully challenged. The educational, and hence economic, mobility of Catholics and Jews has shown other groupsfor example, African Americans, Asian Americans, and Spanish-speaking Americansnot only the difficulties that these earlier aspirants had in overcoming class and ethnic barriers, but the fact that it can be done.

One of the ironies of the history of higher education in the United States is the use of quotas by admissions committees. Restrictive measures were imposed on Jews because they were so successful, whereas benign quotas are currently used to encourage underrepresented minorities to enter colleges and professional schools. The competing claims of both the older and the newer minorities continue to be the subject of controversy, editorial comments, and court casesand will be for years to come.
Tables
ix
Foreword xi
Arthur S. Link
Acknowledgments xv
Introduction xvii
Introduction to the Transaction Edition xxiii
1 The Big Three
3(23)
Why Harvard, Yale, and Princeton?
3(5)
`The Life Line of Empire": Student Recruitment
5(3)
Financing the Empire: Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish Benefactors
8(5)
The Changing Campus: World War I and the Beginning of Restrictive Admissions
13(7)
Drawing the Caste Line: From Admissions to Extracurricular Activities
20(6)
2 Portraits and Philosophies of Two Harvard Presidents
26(32)
Charles W. Eliot
A. Lawrence Lowell
Family Background and Personality
27(2)
Educational Philosophy
29(5)
Social Philosophy: Free or Restricted Immigration?
34(3)
Student Diversity Within Harvard University
37(3)
Irish Catholics
40(4)
Jews
44(3)
Negroes
47(6)
Foreign Student Enrollment
53(5)
3 Harvard: Debate on Restriction, 1922
58(27)
First Inquiries
59(5)
Faculty Meetings of May 23 and June 2, 1922
64(6)
Appointment of the Committee on Methods of Sifting Candidates for Admission
70(3)
Alumni, Undergraduate, and Public Reaction
73(7)
The Negro Question
80(5)
4 Harvard: Methods of Sifting Candidates for Admission, 1920s to 1950s
85(40)
Investigation by the Committee on Methods
86(4)
Denial of Racial Discrimination in Housing and Admissions, 1923
90(3)
Profile of the Jewish Student at Harvard: "Statistical Report"
93(12)
Faculty Adoption of the Committee on Methods' Report
105(1)
Limits on Enrollment in Harvard College: The Beginning of Restriction on Jewish Students, 1926
106(4)
The Harvard Houses: Apportionment of Students by Type of Secondary School and by Race
110(7)
The Masters at Harvard---and at Yale
117(2)
The Students Outside the Houses
119(6)
5 Yale: Reaction and Stabilization, 1900s to 1940s
125(35)
President Arthur Twining Hadley and the "Yale Spirit"
126(4)
Minorities at Yale: Jews, Catholics, Negroes, and Foreign Students
130(6)
President James Rowland Angell and the Old Blues
136(2)
The "Jewish Question": How to "Protect" Yale?
138(9)
Limitation of Numbers, 1922-23
147(5)
First Attempts to Stabilize Jewish Enrollment, 1924
152(8)
6 Princeton: The Triumph of the Clubs, 1900s to 1950s
160(39)
President Woodrow Wilson: An Intellectual Revitalization of Princeton
161(4)
The Quadrangle Plan Versus the Upper-Class Clubs
165(5)
The Graduate School Controversy: A Fight for Social Democracy
170(2)
Minorities at Princeton: Catholics, Jews, and Orientals
172(13)
Woodrow Wilson and A. Lawrence Lowell: Comparison and Contrast
185(3)
Special Committee on Limitation of Enrollment, 1921-22
188(4)
The Beginning of "Selective Admission," 1922
192(7)
7 Conclusion: A New Elite, 1940s to 1970s
199(34)
Harvard
202(8)
Yale
210(8)
Princeton
218(7)
Discretion or Discrimination: Ethnic Quotas in College Admissions
225(8)
Notes 233(56)
Bibliography 289(10)
Index 299
Marcia Graham Synnott is professor emerita of History at the University of South Carolina. Her work has appeared in the Journal of Sport History, History of Education Quarterly, Journal of Policy History, the Public Historian, the Cornell Law Review, and in anthologies on anti-Semitism, coeducation, university desegregation, and on women civil rights activists.