Authors |
|
xi | |
Preface |
|
xiii | |
1 Regulation, Reimbursement and Health Technology Assessment |
|
1 | (36) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
2 | (11) |
|
Regulatory Approval for Prescription Drugs |
|
|
3 | (7) |
|
Regulatory Approval for Devices |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
Regulatory Approval for Public Health and Other Non-Drug, Non-Device Approvals |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Reimbursement Approval for Drugs |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
Initiation of Drug Review for Reimbursement |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Further Clinical Evidence for Drug Reimbursement |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Consideration of Cost in Drug Reimbursement Decisions |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Reimbursement Approval for Devices |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Health Technology Assessment |
|
|
17 | (16) |
|
Step 1: Identify the Topic for Assessment |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
Step 2: Clear Specification of the Problem |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
Step 3: Gathering the Evidence |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Step 4: Aggregation and Appraisal of the Evidence |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
Step 5: Synthesize and Consolidate Evidence |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Step 6: Collection of Primary Data (Field Evaluation) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Step 7: Economic Evaluation, Budget and Health Systems Impact Analysis |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Step 8: Assessment of Social, Ethical and Legal Considerations |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Step 9: Formulation of Findings and Recommendations |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
Step 10: Dissemination of Findings and Recommendations |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Step 11: Monitoring the Impact of Assessment Reports |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (4) |
2 Requirements and Sources of Data to Complete an HTA |
|
37 | (28) |
|
Data Requirements to Complete an HTA |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (4) |
|
Introduction to Health-Related Quality of Life |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
Introduction to Resource Utilization and Costs |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Start with the Trials: Safety and Efficacy |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Secondary Data Requirements |
|
|
50 | (10) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Effectiveness versus Efficacy |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Health-Related Quality of Life |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Resource Utilization and Costs |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (5) |
3 Meta-Analysis |
|
65 | (40) |
|
Overview of Meta-Analysis |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
Initial Steps before a Meta-Analysis |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
A Comment on Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Step 1: Identify the Type of Data for Each Outcome |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
Step 2: Select an Appropriate Outcome Measure |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
Outcomes for Continuous Data |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Step 3: Conduct the Preliminary Analysis with an Assessment of Heterogeneity |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Testing for Heterogeneity |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Step 4: Adjustment for Heterogeneity |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
Step 5: Assess Publication Bias |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Step 6: Assess the Overall Strength of Evidence |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
An Example of Meta-Analysis |
|
|
82 | (8) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Risk-Adjusted or Unadjusted Analysis |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies |
|
|
90 | (5) |
|
Example of Meta-Analysis for Diagnostic Accuracy |
|
|
95 | (6) |
|
Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operator Curve |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
Appendix I: Diagnostic Accuracy Measures |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Appendix II: Estimation of Cohen's Kappa Score |
|
|
104 | (1) |
4 Network Meta-Analysis |
|
105 | (22) |
|
|
105 | (5) |
|
Head-to-Head and Placebo-Controlled Trials |
|
|
105 | (5) |
|
Step 1: Establish Potential Network Diagram of Linking Studies |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
Step 2: Check for Consistency in Outcomes for Common Linking Arms |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
Step 3: Conduct Meta-Analysis and Assess Heterogeneity within Common Comparators |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
Step 4: Conduct Indirect Meta-Analysis across the Comparators |
|
|
116 | (4) |
|
Network Meta-Analysis Software |
|
|
116 | (4) |
|
Step 5: Conduct Subgroup and Sensitivity Analyses |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Step 6: Report Network Meta-Analysis Results |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Bayesian Mixed Treatment Comparisons |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Network Meta-Analysis Example |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
Assessing Robustness: Homogeneity and Consistency of Evidence |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Adjustment for Difference in Baseline Characteristics |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (2) |
5 Bayesian Methods |
|
127 | (22) |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
Study Power for Trials of Rare Diseases |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Interpretation of Bayesian Results |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
Step 1: Specify the Model |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
Step 2: Assign the Prior(s) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Step 3: Conduct the Simulation |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
Step 4: Assess Convergence |
|
|
137 | (5) |
|
Step 5: Report the Findings |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (3) |
|
Advanced Example 1: Combining RCTs and Observational Data |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Advanced Example 2: Covariate Adjustment |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Advanced Example 3: Hierarchical Outcomes |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
6 Survival Analysis |
|
149 | (30) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (6) |
|
Exponential, Gompertz and Weibull Models |
|
|
156 | (6) |
|
Establishing and Using Risk Equations |
|
|
162 | (7) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Acceptability of Surrogates |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
Survival Adjustment for Crossover Bias |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
Building a Life Table from Cross-Sectional Data |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
175 | (4) |
7 Costs and Cost of Illness Studies |
|
179 | (20) |
|
From Clinical Events to Resource Utilization to Costs |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
Measurement of Resource Utilization |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Attribution and Adjustment for Comorbidities |
|
|
182 | (7) |
|
Strategies to Isolate the Cost of an Event |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Other Strategies to Estimate Costs |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
Unit Costs Valuation for Resources |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Perspective and Types of Costs |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
Statistical Issues with Cost Data |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
196 | (3) |
8 Health-Related Quality of Life |
|
199 | (16) |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
Good Properties of Scales |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
Guidelines for Using QOL in HTA |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
Assessing Change in QOL Scales |
|
|
205 | (4) |
|
Change in Level of HRQOL and Domains over Time |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
Minimal Clinically Important Difference for HRQOL |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
Obtaining QOL Estimates from Trials and Literature |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
Mapping between QOL Scales |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
9 Missing Data Methods |
|
215 | (16) |
|
|
216 | (7) |
|
Missed Visits and Loss to Follow-Up |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
Explainable or Unexplainable Patterns of Missing Data |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
Intention-to-Treat or Per-Protocol Analysis |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
Multiple Imputation for Trial Data |
|
|
221 | (2) |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (5) |
|
Missing Measures of Central Tendency |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
Missing Measures of Variance |
|
|
224 | (3) |
|
Missing Data for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Unknown Lifetime Variances for Costs |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
10 Concluding Remarks |
|
231 | (12) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
Academic Writing from a Biostatistician's Point of View |
|
|
232 | (4) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
Discussion and Conclusion |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
Time Management for Writing |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
Improving Reimbursement Submissions |
|
|
239 | (2) |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
|
242 | (1) |
Index |
|
243 | |