Preface |
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xvii | |
1 Technical Developing Pathway of Ecological Coal Mining |
|
1 | (18) |
|
1.1 Background Introduction |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
1.2 Coal Mining Technology Development |
|
|
3 | (8) |
|
1.2.1 Literature Analyses |
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
1.2.1.1 Data Analysis System |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.2.1.2 Knowledge Diagram |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
1.2.2 Three Periods of Coal Mining Technology |
|
|
7 | (14) |
|
1.2.2.1 Competition Phase |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
|
14 | (5) |
2 Developing Trending Toward Ecological Coal Utilization |
|
19 | (18) |
|
2.1 Background Introduction |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
2.2 Coal Utilization Evolution |
|
|
21 | (7) |
|
2.2.1 Initial Technological Competition |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
2.2.2 Fierce Innovative Diffusion |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
2.3 Coal Utilization Development Trends |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
2.3.1 Disruptive Integrated Shift |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
2.3.2 No-Coal-on-Ground Integrated Energy System |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (4) |
3 Multiple Coal Seam Coproduction-Oriented Equilibrium Approach Toward Coal-Water Conflict |
|
37 | (26) |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
3.1.1 Multiple Coal Seam Production System |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 Mining Quota Allocation Scheme |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
3.1.3 Uncertain Condition |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (9) |
|
3.2.1 Motivation for Employing Uncertain Variables |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
3.2.2 Typical Fuzzy Variables in the Proposed Method |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Assumptions and Notations |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.2.4 Lower Level Decision-Making Model |
|
|
43 | (4) |
|
3.2.4.1 Objective Function |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
3.2.5 Upper Level Decision Making Model |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
3.2.6 Global Optimization Model |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
3.3.1 Parameters Defuzzification |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 KKT Condition Transformation |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (7) |
|
3.4.1 Presentation of Case Problem |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Results for Different Scenarios |
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
3.4.3.1 Scenario 1: Water Quality Standards I |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
3.4.3.2 Scenario 2: Water Quality Standards II |
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
|
59 | (3) |
|
3.5.1 Propositions and Analysis |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
3.5.2 Management Recommendations |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
4 Seasonal Changes-Oriented Dynamic Strategy Toward Coal-Water Conflict Resolutions |
|
63 | (26) |
|
4.1 Background Expression |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
|
65 | (10) |
|
4.2.1 Key Problem Statement |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (8) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
4.2.2.3 Logical Representation for the Collieries |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
4.2.2.4 Logical Representation for the Authority |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
4.2.2.5 Global Optimization Model for the EP-MQC |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.2.3 Model Transformation |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (4) |
|
4.3.1 Presentation of the Case Region |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Results Under Different Situations |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
79 | (7) |
|
4.4.1 Propositions and Analysis |
|
|
79 | (5) |
|
4.4.2 Policy Recommendations |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
|
86 | (3) |
5 GIS-Oriented Equilibrium Strategy Toward Coal Gangue Contamination Mitigating |
|
89 | (32) |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
5.2 Key Problem Statement |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
5.3 Coal Gangue Facility Siting Method |
|
|
94 | (11) |
|
5.3.1 Identifying Candidate Sites Using GIS Technique |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Selecting the Optimal Site Using the Modeling Technique |
|
|
96 | (7) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.3 Model Formulation |
|
|
97 | (6) |
|
5.3.3 Model Transformation |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
|
105 | (9) |
|
5.4.1 Case Region Presentation |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
5.4.5 Computational Results and Analysis |
|
|
109 | (5) |
|
5.4.5.1 Scenario 1: α = 1.0 |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
5.4.5.2 Scenario 2: α = 0.9 |
|
|
109 | (3) |
|
5.4.5.3 Scenario 3: α = 0.8 |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
5.4.5.4 Scenario 4: α = 0.7 |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
5.4.5.5 Scenario 5: α = 0.6 |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (3) |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
5.5.2 Management Recommendations |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (4) |
6 Dynamic Investment Strategy Toward Emissions Reduction and Energy Conservation of Coal Mining |
|
121 | (32) |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
6.1.1 Multi-system Consideration of Emission and Energy |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
6.1.2 Multidimensional Consideration of Economic and Ecological Benefits |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
6.1.3 Multi-stage Consideration of Environmental Investment |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
|
125 | (6) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
6.2.3 Colliery Economic Benefit: Profit Objective |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
6.2.4 Colliery Ecological Benefit: Emission Reduction and Energy Conservation |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
6.2.5 Coal Production and Environmental Investment Activities |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
6.2.6 State Process Control Colliery Operations |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
6.2.7 Ecological Coal Mining Economic-Ecological Equilibrium Model |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
6.3 Economic-Ecological Equilibrium Model Solution Approach |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
6.3.1 General Parameterization |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Fuzzy Goals for the Multiobjective Model |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 Standard and AM-Based PSO for Nonlinear Dynamic Model |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
|
135 | (8) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
6.4.4 Results and Different Scenarios |
|
|
138 | (5) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
6.4.4.2 Sensitivity Analysis |
|
|
138 | (5) |
|
6.5 Discussion and Analysis |
|
|
143 | (6) |
|
6.5.1 Comprehensive Discussion for Results |
|
|
143 | (5) |
|
6.5.2 Management Implications |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (4) |
7 Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction-Oriented Integrated Coat-Fired Power Operation Method |
|
153 | (34) |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
7.2 Key Problem Statement |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
157 | (8) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 ICPBD Strategy Intentions |
|
|
157 | (3) |
|
7.3.2.1 Maximizing Economic Benefit |
|
|
157 | (3) |
|
7.3.2.2 Minimizing CO2 Emissions |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
7.3.3 ICPBD Strategy Limitations |
|
|
160 | (3) |
|
7.3.3.1 Coal Purchase Phase Restriction |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
7.3.3.2 Coal Storage Phase Restrictions |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
7.3.3.3 Coal Blending Phase Restrictions |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
7.3.3.4 Coal Distribution Phase Restrictions |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
7.4.1 Presentation of Case Region |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
7.4.2 Model Transformation |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
7.5 Results and Discussion |
|
|
167 | (16) |
|
7.5.1 Results for Different Scenarios |
|
|
167 | (6) |
|
7.5.2 Propositions and Analysis |
|
|
173 | (8) |
|
7.5.3 Management Recommendations |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
|
183 | (4) |
8 Equilibrium Coal Blending Method Toward Multiple Air Pollution Reduction |
|
187 | (38) |
|
8.1 Background Presentation |
|
|
187 | (12) |
|
8.1.1 Relationship Among All the Stakeholders |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
8.1.2 Decision Carrier Between All the Stakeholders |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
|
192 | (7) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
8.1.3.2 Objectives of the Authority |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
8.1.3.3 Constrains of the Authority |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
8.1.3.4 Objectives of the CPPs |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
8.1.3.5 Constraints of the CPPs |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
8.1.3.6 Global Optimization Model |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (4) |
|
8.2.1 Presentation of the Case Region |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
8.2.2 Model Transformation and Solution Approach |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
8.3 Results and Discussion |
|
|
203 | (18) |
|
8.3.1 Results Under Different Scenarios |
|
|
203 | (3) |
|
8.3.2 Propositions and Analysis |
|
|
206 | (15) |
|
8.3.3 Management Recommendations |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
|
221 | (4) |
9 Equilibrium Biomass-Coal Blending Method Toward Carbon Emissions Reduction |
|
225 | (30) |
|
|
225 | (2) |
|
9.2 Key Problem Statement |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (8) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
9.3.3 Model for the Local Authority |
|
|
230 | (3) |
|
9.3.3.1 Objective 1: Maximizing Financial Revenue |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
9.3.3.2 Objective 2: Minimizing Carbon Emissions |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
9.3.3.3 Limitation on the CPPs' Operations |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
9.3.3.4 Power Supply Demand Restriction |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
9.3.3.5 Limitation on the Different Between the Quota and the Actual Emission |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
|
233 | (2) |
|
9.3.4.1 Objective: Maximizing Economic Benefits |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
9.3.4.2 Combustion Efficiency Constraint |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
9.3.4.3 Limitations on Fuel Quantities and Qualities |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
9.3.4.4 Technical Constraint |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
9.3.4.5 Social Responsibility Limitation |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
9.3.4.6 Carbon Emissions Quota Constraint |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
9.3.4.7 Fuel Resources Storage Limitation |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
236 | (4) |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 Model Transformation and Solution Approach |
|
|
236 | (2) |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
9.5 Results and Discussion |
|
|
240 | (11) |
|
9.5.1 Results Under Different Scenarios |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
9.5.2 Propositions and Analyses |
|
|
243 | (8) |
|
9.5.3 Policy Implications |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
251 | (4) |
10 Carbon Emission Reduction-Oriented Equilibrium Strategy for Thermal-Hydro-Wind Generation System |
|
255 | (30) |
|
10.1 Background Introduction |
|
|
255 | (4) |
|
|
259 | (8) |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
10.2.2.1 Carbon Emissions Reduction |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.2 Water Resources Wastes |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.3 Wind Power Utilization |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.4 Power Supply Balance |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
|
263 | (4) |
|
10.2.3.1 Constraints of Wind Power |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
10.2.3.2 Constraints of Coal-Combusted Power Plants |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
10.2.3.3 Constraint of Hydropower Station |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
10.2.3.4 Constraints of Hybrid Generation System |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
|
265 | (2) |
|
|
267 | (2) |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
10.3.2 Model Transformation |
|
|
267 | (2) |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
10.5 Result and Discussion |
|
|
270 | (11) |
|
10.5.1 Result Under Different Scenarios |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
10.5.2 Comprehensive Discussion of Results |
|
|
271 | (9) |
|
10.5.3 Management Recommendations |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
|
281 | (4) |
11 Economic-Environmental Equilibrium-Based Wind-Solar-Thermal Power Generation System |
|
285 | (36) |
|
11.1 Background Introduction |
|
|
285 | (2) |
|
11.2 Key Problem Statement |
|
|
287 | (3) |
|
|
290 | (8) |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
11.3.2.1 Economic Profits |
|
|
290 | (3) |
|
11.3.2.2 Carbon Emissions |
|
|
291 | (1) |
|
11.3.2.3 Renewable Energy Utilization |
|
|
291 | (2) |
|
|
293 | (3) |
|
11.3.3.1 Constraints of Hybrid System |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
11.3.3.2 Constraints of Thermal Power Plant |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
11.3.3.3 Constraints of Wind Power Plant |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
11.3.3.4 Constraints of Solar Power Plant |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
|
296 | (2) |
|
|
298 | (17) |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
11.4.2 Model Transformation |
|
|
299 | (2) |
|
|
301 | (2) |
|
11.4.4 Results and Analysis |
|
|
303 | (12) |
|
|
315 | (2) |
|
11.5.1 Propositions and Analysis |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
11.5.2 Management Recommendations |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
|
317 | (4) |
12 Carbon Emissions Reductions-Oriented Equilibrium Strategy for Municipal Solid Waste with Coal Co-combustion |
|
321 | (32) |
|
12.1 Background Introduction |
|
|
321 | (2) |
|
12.2 Key Problem Statement |
|
|
323 | (3) |
|
12.2.1 Conflict and Cooperation Between the Decision-Makers |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
12.2.2 Trade-Off Between the Economy and the Environment |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
12.2.3 Problem Analysis for MSW/Coal Co-combustion |
|
|
324 | (2) |
|
|
326 | (7) |
|
|
326 | (1) |
|
|
326 | (1) |
|
12.3.3 Allocation Scheme for the Authority |
|
|
326 | (3) |
|
12.3.3.1 Maximizing Financial Revenue |
|
|
326 | (1) |
|
12.3.3.2 Minimizing Carbon Emissions |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
12.3.3.3 Electricity Supply Meeting Demand |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
12.3.3.4 Requirements for the MSWACPPs' Operating Rights |
|
|
328 | (1) |
|
12.3.4 Production Strategy for MSWACPPs |
|
|
329 | (2) |
|
12.3.4.1 Pursuing Maximum Profits |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
12.3.4.2 Coal's Inhibitory Effect on Dioxin Emissions |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
12.3.4.3 Dioxin Emissions Risk Control |
|
|
330 | (1) |
|
12.3.4.4 Limited Carbon Emissions Quota |
|
|
330 | (1) |
|
12.3.4.5 Social Responsibility |
|
|
330 | (1) |
|
12.3.4.6 Fuel Quality Required by the Incinerators |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
12.3.4.7 Limited Fuel Quantity |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
|
331 | (2) |
|
|
333 | (11) |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
12.4.2 Model Transformation and Solution Approach |
|
|
333 | (2) |
|
|
335 | (1) |
|
12.4.4 Results Under Different Scenarios |
|
|
336 | (8) |
|
|
344 | (5) |
|
12.5.1 Propositions and Analysis |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
12.5.2 Management Recommendations |
|
|
345 | (4) |
|
|
349 | (4) |
Index |
|
353 | |